Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 78(6): 808-10, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23409581

RESUMO

A unilateral facet dislocation noted in a 17-year-old boy after an axial cervical trauma proved to be an incidentally encountered preexisting lesion, most likely originating from a forceps delivery at birth. The surgical treatment initially considered was converted to a conservative approach, with full clinical recovery.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Articulação Zigapofisária/lesões , Articulação Zigapofisária/cirurgia , Adolescente , Traumatismos do Nascimento/diagnóstico , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico , Luxações Articulares/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino
2.
Global Spine J ; : 21925682221105271, 2022 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610755

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) was introduced as a less invasive procedure to treat sciatica. Even though the PTED has a small scar size, it is unknown if PTED also leads to better scar-related patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to compare scar-related outcomes between patients undergoing PTED vs open microdiscectomy. METHODS: Patients with at least 6 weeks of radiating leg pain were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to PTED or open microdiscectomy. Scar-related patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Body Image Score (BIS), Cosmesis Scale (CS) and a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) on scar esthetic. RESULTS: Of the 530 included patients, 286 patients underwent PTED and 244 underwent open microdiscectomy as allocated. At 12 months of follow-up, 95% of the patients had data available. At 12 months, the BIS was 6.2 ± 1.7 in the PTED-group and 6.6 ± 1.9 in the open microdiscectomy group (between-group difference .4, 95% CI .2 to .7). CS was 21.3 ± 3.0 in the PTED-group and 18.6 ± 3.4 in the open microdiscectomy group (between-group difference -2.7, 95% CI -3.1 to -2.3). Average NRS for scar esthetic was 9.2 ± 1.3 and 7.8 ± 1.6 in the PTED and open microdiscectomy groups, respectively (between-group difference -1.4, 95% CI -1.6 to -1.2). CONCLUSIONS: PTED leads to a higher self-rated scar esthetic as compared to open microdiscectomy, while self-reported body image seems to be comparable between both groups. Therefore, from an esthetic point, PTED seems to be the preferred technique to treat sciatica.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA