Geriatric Patients with Free Flap Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Analysis of 256 Cases.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients, complex soft tissue defects are increasingly observed due to the prolonged life expectancy and accompanying comorbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether free tissue transfer is safe in very old patients without additional risk and complications. METHODS: All patients older than 65 years undergoing free tissue transfer between November 2007 and September 2016 were reviewed in a retrospective study. Two cohorts were compared regarding perioperative morbidity and postoperative outcome (cohort 1 [old patients, ages 65-79]; cohort 2 [very old patients, ages ≥ 80]). RESULTS: In total, 256 patients were included in the study (cohort 1 [n = 217]; cohort 2 [n = 39]). Overall, 262 free flaps were performed due to a second microsurgical reconstruction in six cases. No statistically significant differences between cohorts were observed regarding surgical complications, total flap losses, and mortality. Detailed evaluation of cohort 2 revealed a significant learning curve during the observation period regarding the perioperative management and procedure of soft tissue reconstruction: operation length as well as postoperative intensive care unit stay decreased significantly over time (p < 0.05) and also surgical complications showed a positive trend (p = 0.07). We ascertained a shift toward a "more reliable" flap selection from predominantly anterolateral thigh flap) to axial flaps such as rectus abdominis and latissimus dorsi flaps. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that age is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Reliable muscle free flaps, two-stage procedures, and safe vascular supply are important strategic aspects to achieve microvascular tissue transfer with high success rates in geriatric patients.

Systematic Review of Quality-of-Life Measurement After Aesthetic Rhinoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of outcomes in aesthetic rhinoplasty is highly relevant because patient satisfaction and improved health-related quality of life (QoL) are the predominant factors in determining success. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) employed in rhinoplasty research studies are remarkably diverse, thus yielding difficulties with data analysis. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to reveal the relevance of the QoL assessment for rhinosurgeons. METHODS: A systematic literature search with the terms "Rhinoplasty" and "Quality of Life" was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases. Primarily, all publications related to QoL following aesthetic rhinoplasty between 2002 and 2017 were identified. As a secondary selection, we focused on articles with a prospective study design, a significant cohort size (at least 50 patients) and a follow-up period of at least 6 months after aesthetic rhinoplasty. RESULTS: A total of 62 PROM studies assessing QoL following aesthetic rhinoplasties were obtained. We ascertained an increasing publication rate of QoL articles over the last 15 years. Only 17 studies satisfied comprehensive inclusion criteria of a high qualitative study selection. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation was the most frequently used QoL questionnaire of the secondary selection (70.6%). The total number of 16 various questionnaires exhibit high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our data strengthen the increasing importance of the assessment of QoL after rhinoplasty. Despite a lack of reliable publications with considerable heterogeneity and large variability in outcomes, functional-aesthetic rhinoplasty leads to a significant improvement of patient's health-related QoL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Quality of life outcome in revision rhinoplasty in regards to number of revision surgeries and cartilage donor site.

OBJECTIVES: Rhinoplasty with or without combined septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed procedures in facial plastic surgery. Patient satisfaction and improvement in quality of life (QoL) is the primary goal. This prospective study was conducted to analyse Qol outcome in revision rhinoplasty in regards to number of revision surgeries and cartilage donor site using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Preoperative and at least 12-months postoperative scores on the Nasal Obstruction Symptome Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire (range 0-100, lower scores indicate better outcome) and the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire (range 0-100, higher scores indicates better outcome) were obtained. Additionally, data on age, gender and number of previous rhinoplasties were assessed. All revision rhinoplasties were performed by one surgeon (author, F.R.) between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (11 (17.2%) male, 53 (82.8%) female) prospectively enrolled in this study. In 41 (64.1%) cases septal cartilage and in 23 (35.9%) patients ear cartilage was the donor site in revision surgery. Patients with more than one previous surgery (n=18) started with a lower preoperative ROE score (28.2 ± 12.8) compared to patients who had received only one previous surgery. The difference however was not significant (p=0.06). This subgroup still showed significant postoperative improvement (ROE-postop 61.9 ± 24.2; p<0.05). Both cohorts (septal cartilage and ear cartilage) improved significantly in regards to their ROE and NOSE scores after surgery and therefore showed improved health-related QoL. We could not detect any differences in health-related QoL postoperatively in regards to cartilage donor site in revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Revision rhinoplasty improves health-related QoL. There are no differences in ROE- or NOSE-scores postoperatively in regards to graft material (ear- versus septal cartilage). Both subgroups show significantly higher scores postoperatively.

One-Stage versus Two-Stage Arteriovenous Loop Reconstructions: An Experience on 103 Cases from a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for flap anastomosis to an arteriovenous loop remains controversial. Whether perforator flaps and axially vascularized muscle or fasciocutaneous flaps lead to comparable outcomes in conjunction with arteriovenous loops has not been investigated. METHODS: Medical records from 103 patients undergoing arteriovenous loop reconstruction (76 one-stage and 27 two-stage) between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between one- and two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions and different types of free flaps. RESULTS: Rates of flap thrombosis, major wound complications, and flap failure did not differ significantly between one- and two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions (14.47 percent versus 11.11 percent, p = 1.00; 30.26 percent versus 25.93 percent, p = 0.67; and 10.53 percent versus 7.41 percent, p = 1.00). For two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions, the time interval between arteriovenous loop placement and flap anastomosis was a predictor for thrombotic events (OR, 1.31; p < 0.05). Anterolateral thigh flaps in conjunction with arteriovenous loops showed higher failure rates (33.33 percent) compared with all other flaps (6.59 percent) (p < 0.05) and combined latissimus dorsi and parascapular flaps (0 percent) (p < 0.05). Thrombosis rates were higher in anterolateral thigh flaps (33.33 percent) compared with all other flaps (10.99 percent; p = 0.056), and combined latissimus dorsi and parascapular flaps (0 percent; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions do not lead to increased postoperative complications compared to one-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions and may be favorable in complicated cases because of shorter operative times. To avoid an increased thrombosis risk, flap anastomosis should not be delayed beyond 10 days in two-stage arteriovenous loop reconstructions. Anterolateral thigh flaps are less suitable for arteriovenous loop reconstructions because of higher complication rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Microsurgical reconstruction for post-traumatic defects of lower leg in the elderly: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Lower leg microsurgical reconstruction in the elderly is challenging, especially for post - traumatic defects. The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors, management and outcome of free tissue transfer in patients older than 65 years of post-traumatic defects. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients older than 18 years undergoing free tissue transfer for post-traumatic lower leg reconstruction from April 2000 to November 2014. A comparative study was designed to identify risk factors and outcome. RESULTS: In total, 197 patients (ages 18-64) and 44 patients (ages ≥65, average 71.7±6.3) were included and allocated into cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Cohort 2 had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral artery disease (46.6%, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in major flap complications, donor site complications and amputation rates (P>0.05). A higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was observed in cohort 2 (37.8%, P<0.01). Comparable limb salvage rates were recorded (97.1% and 95.6%, P=0.59) with an average follow-up of 25.9±30.1months in cohort 1 and 23.7±16.6months in cohort 2. CONCLUSION: Post-traumatic microsurgical free tissue transfer to the lower leg can be performed safely in patients older than 65 years with high success rate and manageable complications.