The effect of amantadine on acute cognitive disability after severe traumatic brain injury: An institutional pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Amantadine is used in the post-acute care setting to improve cognitive function after a traumatic brain injury. Its utility in the acute postinjury period is unknown. In this pilot study, we sought to examine the effect of amantadine on short-term cognitive disability among patients with a severe traumatic brain injury and hypothesized that patients receiving amantadine would have a greater improvement in disability throughout their acute hospitalization. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study of patients ≥18 years with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) at a level I trauma center between 2020 and 2022. Patients with penetrating trauma, death within 48 hours of admission, and no radiographic evidence of intracranial pathology were excluded. Patients were grouped according to whether they received amantadine. Our primary outcome was the change in cognitive disability, measured by the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), over the index hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 55 patients in the cohort: 41.8% (n = 23) received amantadine and 58.2% (n = 32) did not. There were higher rates of motor vehicle collisions (65.2% vs 46.9%, P = .02), diffuse axonal injury (47.8% vs 18.8%, P = .02), intracranial pressure monitor use (73.9% vs 21.9%, P = .0001), and propranolol use (73.9% vs 21.9%, P = .0001) in the amantadine. There was a larger improvement in DRS scores among patients receiving amantadine (7.8 vs 3.6, P = .001), and amantadine independently predicted improvement in DRS scores (ß, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-3.02, P = .03). Rates of discharge to traumatic brain injury rehabilitation were significantly higher in the amantadine group (73.9% vs 21.9%, P = .0002). CONCLUSION: Among patients with severe traumatic brain injury, amantadine use in the acute postinjury period may be associated with an improvement in cognitive disability and discharge to traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.

Effects of Early Chemoprophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still unknown. We designed a study to determine the effect that timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis has on VTE rates in TBI patients. METHODS: Patient records were obtained from 32 level 1 and 2 trauma centers in the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2008 to 2018. Overall, 5589 patients with a TBI were included and split into cohorts based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time. Outcomes included rate of VTE, mortality, and serious in-hospital complications. RESULTS: There were nine patients (1.3%) in the <24 hour group with a VTE as compared to 36 (2.6%) in the 24-48 hour group, 51 (4.1%) in the 48-72 hour group, and 181 (8.1%) in the >72 hour group (P < .001). The adjusted odds of VTE were significantly greater in patients initiated within 48-72 hours (AOR 2.861, 95% CI 1.271-6.439) and >72 hours (AOR 3.963, 95% CI 1.824-8.612) compared to <24 hours. Patients that received VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours had similar rates of serious in-hospital complication as patients initiated within 24-48 hours (AOR .956, 95% CI .637-1.434) and 48-72 hour (AOR 1.132, 95% CI .757-1.692) but less than the >72 hour group (AOR 1.662, 95% CI 1.154-2.393) groups. DISCUSSION: Patients initiated on VTE prophylaxis within 48 hours of presentation had lower incidence of VTE without a significant increase in serious complications.

The Effect of Antiplatelet Agents on Thromboelastography.

BACKGROUND: Thomboelastography (TEG) is a point of care viscoelastic test that provides an assessment of clot formation and kinetics. Antiplatelet agents are commonly used but there is limited literature evaluating their possible effects on overall clot kinetics. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between antiplatelet agents and clot kinetics as defined by TEG. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent TEG from February 2018 to July 2020. Patients who received anticoagulants or blood transfusions within 72 hours, had an incomplete TEG, were diagnosed with COVID-19, or had liver failure were excluded. Patients were stratified based on antiplatelet status. RESULTS: Of 1060 patients, 119 were included (50 controls, 69 antiplatelet agents-37 aspirin monotherapy, 26 dual antiplatelet therapy). Between the control and antiplatelet therapy groups, there was no significant difference in clot time, maximal clot strength, or fibrinogen level. When compared to control patients, patients on dual antiplatelets had significantly higher fibrinogen levels (408.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P = .013) but no significant differences in clot time or maximal clot strength. In our subgroup analysis, patients on dual antiplatelets had increased maximal clot strength (58.8° vs 63°, P = .005) and fibrinogen levels (384.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P = .005) compared to those on aspirin alone. DISCUSSION: Compared to control patients and those on aspirin alone, patients on dual antiplatelets have increased maximal clot strength and increased fibrinogen levels. These results can help physicians better target product resuscitation in patients who are on antiplatelet agents.

Fatal opioid overdoses geospatially cluster with level 1 trauma centers in Ohio.

OBJECTIVE: Ohio is consistently ranked as one of the worst states for opioid overdose deaths. Traumatic injury has been linked to opioid overdose deaths, yet the location of trauma centers has not been explored. We examined whether geospatial clustering occurred between county-level opioid overdose deaths (OODs) and trauma center levels. METHODS: We obtained 2019 county-level data from the Ohio Department of Health for fatal overdoses from prescription opioids. We obtained the total number of opioid doses prescribed in 2019 per county from the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System and American College of Surgeons designated trauma center locations within Ohio from their website. We used geospatial analysis to assess if clustering occurred between trauma center level and prescription opioid overdose deaths at a county level. RESULTS: There were 42 trauma centers located within 21 counties: 7 counties had level 1, and 14 counties had only level 2/level 3. There was no difference in rates of opioid doses prescribed per 100,000 people between counties with level 1 trauma centers and only level 2/level 3. However, prescription OODs rates were significantly higher in counties with level 1 trauma centers (37.6 vs 20, P = .02). Geospatial clustering was observed between level 1 trauma centers and prescription opioid overdose deaths at the county level (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Geospatial clustering exists between prescription OODs and level 1 trauma center locations in Ohio. Improved at-risk patient identification and targeted community outreach represent opportunities for trauma providers to tackle the opioid epidemic.

Nontrauma emergency surgery: optimal case mix for general surgery and acute care surgery training.

BACKGROUND: To examine the case mix and patient characteristics and outcomes of the nontrauma emergency (NTE) service in an academic Division of Acute Care Surgery. METHODS: An NTE service (attending, chief resident, postgraduate year-3 and postgraduate year-2 residents, and two physician assistants) was created in July 2005 for all urgent and emergent inpatient and emergency department general surgery patient consults and admissions. An NTE database was created with prospective data collection of all NTE admissions initiated from November 1, 2007. Prospective data were collected by a dedicated trauma registrar and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-intensive care unit (ICU) coordinator daily. NTE case mix and ICU characteristics were reviewed for the 2-year time period January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009. During the same time period, trauma operative cases and procedures were examined and compared with the NTE case mix. RESULTS: Thousand seven hundred eight patients were admitted to the NTE service during this time period (789 in 2008 and 910 in 2009). Surgical intervention was required in 70% of patients admitted to the NTE service. Exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy was performed in 449 NTE patients, comprising 37% of all surgical procedures. In comparison, only 118 trauma patients (5.9% of admissions) required a major laparotomy or thoracotomy during the same time period. Acuity of illness of NTE patients was high, with a significant portion (13%) of NTE patients requiring ICU admission. NTE patients had higher admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores [61.2 vs. 58.8 (2008); 58.2 vs. 55.8 (2009)], increased mortality [(9.71% vs. 4.89% (2008); 6.78% vs. 5.16% (2009)], and increased readmission rates (15.5% vs. 7.4%) compared with the total surgical ICU (SICU) admissions. CONCLUSION: In an era of declining operative caseload in trauma, the NTE service provides ample opportunity for complex general surgery decision making and operative procedures for surgical residency education, including advanced surgical critical care management. In addition, creation of an NTE service provides an optimal general surgery case mix, including major abdominal operations, that can augment declining trauma surgery caseloads, maintain acute care faculty surgical skills, and support general and acute care surgery residency training.

American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center.

BACKGROUND: To examine the impact of an ongoing comprehensive performance improvement and patient safety (PIPS) program implemented in 2005 on mortality outcomes for trauma patients at an established American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified Level I Trauma Center. METHODS: The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and intensive care unit admissions were used as stratifying variables to examine outcomes over a 5-year period (2004-2008). Institution mortality rates were compared with the National Trauma Data Bank mortality rates stratified by ISS score. Enhancements to our comprehensive PIPS program included revision of trauma activation criteria, development of standardized protocols for initial resuscitation, massive transfusion, avoidance of over-resuscitation, tourniquet use, pelvic fracture management, emphasis on timely angiographic and surgical intervention, prompt spine clearance, reduction in time to computed tomography imaging, reduced dwell time in emergency department, evidence-based traumatic brain injury management, and multidisciplinary efforts to reduce healthcare-associated infections. RESULTS: In 2004 (baseline data), the in-hospital mortality rate for the most severely injured trauma patients (ISS >24) at our trauma center was 30%, consistent with the reported mortality rate from the National Trauma Data Bank for patients with this severity of injury. Over 5 years, our mortality rate decreased significantly for severely injured patients with an ISS >24, from 30.1% (2004) to 18.3% (2008), representing a 12% absolute reduction in mortality (p = 0.011). During the same 5-year time period, the proportion of elderly patients (age >65 years) cared for at our trauma center increased from 23.5% in 2004 to 30.6% in 2008 (p = 0.0002). Class I trauma activations increased significantly from 5.5% in 2004 to 15.5% in 2008 based on our reclassification. A greater percentage of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (25.8% in 2004 to 37.3% in 2007 and 30.4% in 2008). No difference was identified in the rate of blunt (95%) or penetrating (5%) mechanism of injury in our patients over this time period. Trauma Quality Improvement Program confirmed improved trauma outcomes with observed-to-expected ratio and 95% confidence intervals of 0.64 (0.42-0.86) for all patients, 0.54 (0.15-0.91) for blunt single-system patients, and 0.78 (0.51-1.06) for blunt multisystem patients. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multifaceted trauma PIPS program aimed at improving trauma care significantly reduced in-hospital mortality in a mature ACS Level I trauma center. Optimal care of the injured patient requires uncompromising commitment to PIPS.

Association of timing of initiation of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with outcomes in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients are at a high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following traumatic injury. We examined the relationship between timing of initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis with VTE complications. METHODS: Trauma quality collaborative data from 34 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma-verified levels I and II trauma centers were analyzed. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulant therapy at the time of injury, had hospitalization <48 hours, or received no or nonstandard pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis (heparin drip). Patient comparison groups were based on timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis relative to hospital presentation (0 to <24 hours, 24 to <48 hours, ≥48 hours). Risk-adjusted rates of VTE events were calculated accounting for patient factors including type of pharmacologic agent in addition to standard trauma patient confounders. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients who received blood in the first 4 hours and/or patients with a significant traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: Within the 79,386 patients analyzed, there were 1,495 (1.9%) who experienced a VTE complication and 1,437 (1.8%) who died. After adjusting for type of prophylaxis and patient factors, the risk of a VTE event was significantly increased in the 24- to <48-hour (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.47; p = 0.002) and ≥48-hour (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-2.70; p < 0.001) cohorts relative to patients initiated at 0 to <24 hours. These VTE event findings remained significant after exclusion of perceived higher-risk patients in a sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in stable trauma patients is associated with lower rates of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level III.

Early Chemoprophylaxis in Severely Injured Trauma Patients Reduces Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a serious complication for trauma patients. While early VTE prophylaxis has gained traction, the timing of prophylaxis remains uncertain. We hypothesized that VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission would have lower VTE rates and similar rates of adverse events in seriously injured patients. METHODS: Trauma patients were included from 32 American College of Surgeons verified Level 1 and 2 trauma centers over a 10-year period. Patients with injury severity score (ISS) <15, death or discharge within 48 hours of arrival, or who received no prophylaxis were excluded. RESULTS: 14 096 patients received VTE prophylaxis with an ISS of ≥15. Patients given prophylaxis at <24 hours had fewer VTE events and trended toward fewer serious in-hospital complications. Mortality and return to the operating room were similar across groups. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay in the <24 hours prophylaxis group was significantly shorter when VTE prophylaxis was initiated earlier. CONCLUSIONS: In severely injured trauma patients with ISS >15, early VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours significantly reduced the risk of VTE as compared with delayed prophylaxis. Early chemoprophylaxis was found to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of VTE; however, the safety of this practice should be evaluated by future prospective studies.

Effect of Preinjury Oral Anticoagulants on Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury from Falls in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin has been the oral anticoagulant of choice for the treatment of thromboembolic disease. However, upward of 50% of all new anticoagulant prescriptions are now for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Despite this, outcome data evaluating preinjury anticoagulants remain scarce following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our study objective is to determine the effects of preinjury anticoagulation on outcomes in older adults with TBI. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from 29 level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2012 to June 30, 2018. Overall, 8312 patients who were aged 65 years or older, suffering a ground level fall, and with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score of ≥ 3 were identified. Patients were excluded if they presented with no signs of life or a traumatic mechanism besides ground level fall. Statistical comparisons were made using multivariable analyses with anticoagulant/antiplatelet use as the independent variable. RESULTS: Of the total patients with TBI, 3293 were on antiplatelet agents (AP), 669 on warfarin, 414 on warfarin + AP, 188 on DOACs, 116 on DOAC + AP, and 3632 on no anticoagulant. There were 185 (27.7%) patients on warfarin and 43 (22.9%) on a DOAC with a combined outcome of mortality or hospice as compared to 575 (15.8%) in the no anticoagulant group (p<0.001). After adjusting for patient factors, there was an increased risk of mortality or hospice in the warfarin (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.27-2.01) and DOAC group (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.07-2.59) as compared to no anticoagulant. Warfarin + AP was associated with an increased risk of mortality or hospice (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.21) that was not seen with DOAC + AP (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.46-1.87) as compared to no anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with TBI, preinjury treatment with warfarin or DOACs resulted in an increased risk of mortality or hospice whereas preinjury AP therapy did not increase risk. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes to directly compare TBI outcomes associated with preinjury warfarin versus DOAC use.

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: early or delayed repair--results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach to stable blunt thoracic aortic injuries (TAI) is immediate repair, with delayed repair reserved for patients with major associated injuries. In recent years, there has been a trend toward delayed repair, even in low-risk patients. This study evaluates the current practices in the surgical community regarding the timing of aortic repair and its effects on outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational multicenter study sponsored by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. The study included patients with blunt TAI scheduled for aortic repair by open or endovascular procedure. Patients in extremis and those managed without aortic repair were excluded. The data collection included demographics, initial clinical presentation, Injury Severity Scores, type and site of aortic injury, type of aortic repair (open or endovascular repair), and time from injury to aortic repair. The study patients were divided into an early repair (< or = 24 hours) and delayed repair groups (> 24 hours). The outcome variables included survival, ventilator days, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, blood transfusions, and complications. The outcomes in the two groups were compared with multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, hypotension, major associated injuries, and type of aortic repair. A second multivariate analysis compared outcomes between early and delayed repair, in patients with and patients without major associated injuries. RESULTS: There were 178 patients with TAI eligible for inclusion and analysis, 109 (61.2%) of which underwent early repair and 69 (38.8%) delayed repair. The two groups had similar epidemiologic, injury severity, and type of repair characteristics. The adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the early repair group (adjusted OR [95% CI] 7.78 [1.69-35.70], adjusted p value = 0.008). The adjusted complication rate was similar in the two groups. However, delayed repair was associated with significantly longer ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Analysis of the 108 patients without major associated injuries, adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, hypotension, and type of aortic repair, showed that in early repair there was a trend toward higher mortality rate (adjusted OR 9.08 [0.88-93.78], adjusted p value = 0.064) but a significantly lower complication rate (adjusted OR 0.4 [0.18-0.96], adjusted p value 0.040) and shorter ICU stay (adjusted p value = 0.021) than the delayed repair group. A similar analysis of the 68 patients with major associated injuries, showed a strong trend toward higher mortality in the early repair group (adjusted OR 9.39 [0.93-95.18], adjusted p value = 0.058). The complication rate was similar in both groups (adjusted p value = 0.239). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed repair of stable blunt TAI is associated with improved survival, irrespective of the presence or not of major associated injuries. However, delayed repair is associated with a longer length of ICU stay and in the group of patients with no major associated injuries a significantly higher complication rate.

Association of mortality among trauma patients taking preinjury direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND: The population of patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy for medical conditions is increasing. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of preinjury anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy on outcomes after trauma. METHODS: This cohort study analyzed data from the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2012 to 2017 and included trauma patients age ≥16 years with an Injury Severity Score ≥5 treated at 29 hospitals. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 115,042 trauma patients, 44.2% were women and 78.2% were white with a mean age (standard deviation) of 59.1 (23.2) years. A total of 23,196 patients were on antiplatelet therapy, 3,855 on warfarin, 1,893 on warfarin + antiplatelet agent, 1,306 on a direct oral anticoagulant, and 717 patients on direct oral anticoagulant + antiplatelet therapy. We observed an increased risk of mortality in patients on preinjury antiplatelet (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.33), warfarin (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65), or warfarin + antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.18-2.14). Patients on a direct oral anticoagulant only were not at statistically increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSION: Preinjury antiplatelet and/or warfarin use was associated with an increased risk of mortality after traumatic injury. Preinjury direct oral anticoagulant use was not associated with a statistically increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Mean glucose values predict trauma patient mortality.

BACKGROUND: Tight glycemic control in a mixed surgical intensive care unit patient population has been associated with improved survival. We postulated targeted therapy to achieve glucose levels <140 mg/dL would reduce infectious complications and mortality in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted to our American College of Surgeons Level I Trauma Center ICU from July 2004 through June 30, 2006 were studied. Insulin therapy was instituted for ICU patients admitted after July 1, 2005 with glucose >140 mg/dL. Data on infections and all glucose values were collected. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale Score, admit blood pressure, and intubation status was performed. RESULTS: Five thirty-one ICU patients were admitted with a mean Injury Severity Score of 23 +/- 13 and mean age of 45 years +/- 19 years. The admission, mean, and maximum glucoses were 141, 129, and 192 respectively. In multivariate analyses, increases in all three glucose values were associated with a significantly higher mortality, with the best model achieved using mean glucose with a receiver operating curve of 0.90. For mean glucose categories of >200 mg/dL, 141 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL, and

Angioembolization reduces operative intervention for blunt splenic injury.

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury (BSI) has become gold standard, but the role of angiographic embolization (AE) is still controversial for bleeding. We postulated that splenic AE for BSI would have superior outcomes compared with operation and increase our splenic salvage rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I center from 2000 through 2006. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale score was performed. Only patients who had a computed tomographic (CT) scan before surgery (CT + OR) were compared with those who had CT scans then AE. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 317 patients required initial intervention for their BSI, for a no intervention rate (no OR or AE) of 73% and a nonoperative rate of 89%. The groups had similar Injury Severity Score, mortality, and lengths of stay. The AE group was older (p < 0.01), had higher spleen Abbreviated Injury Score (p = 0.02), and required significantly fewer packed RBC transfusions, p < 0.01. The overall hospitalization costs were not different, but the number of intraabdominal complications was higher for the CT + OR group (36% vs. 6%, p < 0.01). Pneumonia, thromboembolic events, and pleural effusions were equivalent. There were no deaths from splenic hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Despite recent concerns that AE may be overutilized for BSI, this study showed a lower incidence of abdominal complications and blood utilization in the AE group despite an older age and higher splenic Abbreviated Injury Score. Use of AE decreased operative intervention by 16%.

Operative repair or endovascular stent graft in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study is to assess the early efficacy and safety of endovascular stent grafts (SGs) in traumatic thoracic aortic injuries and compare outcomes with the standard operative repair (OR). PATIENTS: Prospective, multicenter study. Data for the following were collected: age, blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at admission, type of aortic injury, injury severity score, abbreviate injury scale (AIS), transfusions, survival, ventilator days, complications, and intensive care unit and hospital days. The outcomes between the two groups (open repair or SG) were compared, adjusting for presence of critical extrathoracic trauma (head, abdomen, or extremity AIS >3), GCS score 55 years. Separate multivariable analysis was performed, one for patients without and one for patients with associated critical extrathoracic injuries (head, abdomen, or extremity AIS >3), to compare the outcomes of the two therapeutic modalities adjusting for hypotension, GCS score 55 years. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients met the criteria for inclusion. Overall, 125 patients (64.9%) were selected for SG and 68 (35.2%) for OR. SG was selected in 71.6% of the 74 patients with major extrathoracic injuries and in 60.0% of the 115 patients with no major extrathoracic injuries. SG patients were significantly older than OR patients. Overall, 25 patients in the SG group (20.0%) developed 32 device-related complications. There were 18 endoleaks (14.4%), 6 of which needed open repair. Procedure-related paraplegia developed in 2.9% in the OR and 0.8% in the SG groups (p = 0.28). Multivariable analysis adjusting for severe extrathoracic injuries, hypotension, GCS, and age, showed that the SG group had a significantly lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 8.42; 95% CI: [2.76-25.69]; adjusted p value <0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (adjusted mean difference: 4.98; 95% CI: [0.14-9.82]; adjusted p value = 0.046) than the OR group. Among the 115 patients without major extrathoracic injuries, higher mortality and higher transfusion requirements were also found in the OR group (adjusted odds ratio for mortality: 13.08; 95% CI [2.53-67.53], adjusted p value = 0.002 and adjusted mean difference in transfusion units: 4.45; 95% CI [1.39-7.51]; adjusted p value = 0.004). Among the 74 patients with major extrathoracic injuries, significantly higher mortality and pneumonia rate were found in the OR group (adjusted p values 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that centers with high volume of endovascular procedures had significantly fewer systemic complications (adjusted p value 0.001), fewer local complications (adjusted p value p = 0.033), and shorter hospital lengths of stay (adjusted p value 0.005) than low-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons select SG for traumatic thoracic aortic ruptures, irrespective of associated injuries, injury severity, and age. SG is associated with significantly lower mortality and fewer blood transfusions, but there is a considerable risk of serious device-related complications. There is a major and urgent need for improvement of the available endovascular devices.

Diagnosis and treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries: changing perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries has undergone many significant changes over the last decade. The present study compares clinical practices and results between an earlier prospective multicenter study by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma completed in 1997 (AAST1) and a new similar study completed in 2007 (AAST2). METHODS: The AAST1 study included 274 patients from 50 participating centers over a period of 30 months. The AAST2 study included 193 patients from 18 centers, over a period of 26 months. The comparisons between the two studies included the method of definitive diagnosis of the aortic injury [computed tomography (CT) scan, aortography, transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) or magnetic resonance imaging], the method of definitive aortic repair (open repair vs. endovascular repair, clamp and sew vs. bypass techniques), the time from injury to procedure (early vs. delayed repair), and outcomes (survival, procedure-related paraplegia, other complications). RESULTS: There was a major shift of the method of definitive diagnosis of the aortic injury, from aortography in the AAST1 to CT scan in AAST2, and a nearly complete elimination of aortography and TEE in the AAST2 study. In the AAST2 study the diagnosis was made by CT scan in 93.3%, aortography in 8.3%, and TEE in 1.0% of patients when compared with 34.8%, 87.0%, and 11.9%, respectively, in the AAST1 study (p < 0.001). The mean time from injury to aortic repair increased from 16.5 hours in the AAST1 study to 54.6 hours in the AAST2 study (p < 0.001). In the AAST1 study, all patients were managed with open repair, whereas in the AAST2 study only 35.2% were managed with open repair and the remaining 64.8% were managed with endovascular stent-grafts. In the patients managed with open repair, the use of bypass techniques increased from 64.7% to 83.8%. The overall mortality, excluding patients in extremis, decreased significantly from 22.0% to 13.0% (p = 0.02). Also, the incidence of procedure-related paraplegia in patients with planned operation, decreased from 8.7% to 1.6% (p = 0.001). However, the incidence of early graft-related complications increased from 0.5% in the AAST1 to 18.4% in the AAST2 study. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison between the two AAST studies in 1997 and 2007 showed a major shift in the diagnosis of the aortic injury, with the widespread use of CT scan and the almost complete elimination of aortography and TEE. The concept of delayed definitive repair has gained wide acceptance. Endovascular repair has replaced open repair to a great extent. These changes have resulted in a major reduction of mortality and procedure-related paraplegia but also a significant increase of early graft-related complications.

Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has reduced complications for surgery patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma maintains the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to track injured patient comorbidities, complications, and mortality. We sought to apply the NSQIP methodology to collect comorbidity and outcome data for trauma patients. Data were compared to the NTDB to determine the benefit and validity of using the NSQIP methodology for trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Utilizing the NSQIP methodology, data were collected from August 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005 on all adult patients admitted to the trauma service at a level 1 trauma center. NSQIP data were collected for general surgery patients during the same time period from the same institution. Data were also extracted from v5.0 of the NTDB for patients >or=18 years old admitted to level 1 trauma centers. Comparisons between University of Michigan (UM) NSQIP Trauma and UM NSQIP General Surgery patients and between UM NSQIP Trauma and NTDB (2004) patients were performed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Before risk adjustment, there was a difference in mortality between the UM NSQIP Trauma and NTDB (2004) groups with univariate analysis (8.4% vs 5.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.9; P = .01). This survival advantage reversed to favor the UM NSQIP Trauma patient group when risk adjustment was performed (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4; P < .001). The UM NSQIP Trauma group had more complications than the UM NSQIP general surgery patients. Despite having a lower risk-adjusted rate of mortality, the UM NSQIP Trauma patients had significantly higher rates of complications (wound infection, wound disruption, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis) than the NTDB (2004) patients in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Complications occurred more frequently in trauma patients than general surgery patients. The UM NSQIP Trauma patients had higher rates of complications than reported in the NTDB. The NTDB data potentially underreport important comorbidity and outcome data. Application of the NSQIP methodology to trauma may present an improved means of effectively tracking and reducing adverse outcomes in a risk-adjusted manner.

Survey of primary school educators regarding burn-risk behaviors and fire-safety education.

OBJECTIVE: To assess primary school educator knowledge and opinions regarding fire-setting behaviors and burn-injury prevention education. DESIGN AND SETTING: A written survey, consisting of 24 questions, was distributed to 8 primary schools. The survey was designed by our burn center personnel to assess basic knowledge and opinions. It was distributed to teachers by the school principals and completed surveys were collected by our staff. RESULTS: Twenty percent of elementary school educators surveyed had experience teaching burned children (mean age: 7+/-3; range: 2-17); 8% had experience with children that were injured due to fire-play. Fire experimentation begins at 6.1+/-2 years of age (range: 2-13). Educators believe students can benefit from a fire prevention curriculum beginning at 7.3+/-1.8 years (range: 5-12). The average time requested for an elementary school burn-injury prevention program was 4+/-3h. Kindergarten teachers requested 8h and fifth grade teachers asked for 3.3h. Over 97% of elementary school teachers agree that discussions about the medical and social consequences of burns will reduce fire-play behavior in children. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all primary school educators surveyed agreed that burn injuries and attempting to curb fire-play are important societal issues. There was wide agreement that including a description of the medical and social consequences of burns in a preventive curriculum would enhance its efficacy. The younger students are, the more time teachers require to adequately convey fire safety instruction.

The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program: Results from a collaborative quality initiative.

BACKGROUND: American College of Surgeons verified trauma centers and a third-party payer within the state of Michigan built a regional collaborative quality initiative (CQI). The Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program began as a pilot in 2008 and expanded to a formal program in 2011. Here, we examine the performance of the collaborative over time with regard to patient outcomes, resource utilization, and process measures. METHODS: Data from the initial 23 hospitals that joined the CQI in 2011 were analyzed. Performance trends from 2011 to 2015 were evaluated for outcomes, resource utilization, and process measures using univariate analysis. Risk-adjustment was performed to confirm results observed in the unadjusted data. To calculate the potential number of patients impacted by the CQI program, the maximum absolute change was multiplied by the number of trauma patients treated in the 23 hospitals during 2015. RESULTS: Membership in a CQI program significantly reduced serious complications (8.5 vs. 7.3%, p = 0.002), decreased resource utilization, and improved process measure execution in trauma patients over 5 years time. Similar results were obtained in unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses. The CQI program potentially avoided inferior vena cava filter placement in 167 patients annually. Decreased venous thromboembolism rates mirrored increased compliance with venous thromboembolism pharmacologic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: This study confirms our hypothesis that participation in a regional CQI improves patient outcomes and decreases resource utilization while promoting compliance with processes of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/therapeutic care, level V.

Diagnosis and management of bile leaks after blunt liver injury.

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt liver injuries (BLIs) is common, but little data exist on the management of complications related to NOM. Furthermore, bile leaks are emerging as frequent complications of NOM. The goal of this study was to determine which BLI patients are at greatest risk for bile leaks and how to manage this complication. METHODS: Patients treated with NOM, including angiographic embolization (AE) and observation, were compared with those undergoing operation (OR). Mortality, hospital length of stay, liver-related complications, and severity of liver injury were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients sustained a BLI from 1997 through 2004. The Injury Severity Score and age of the groups were similar. The mortality rate of the OR patients was higher (P = .02). All bile leaks occurred in patients with a liver Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) of > or = 4. For survivors of more than 4 days, 71% of OR, 50% of AE, and 17% of observed patients developed bile leaks. For the OR and AE groups, HIDA scanning detected all leaks, leading to earlier drainage procedures. Detection of a bile leak in NOM patients before 5 days of hospitalization led to shorter HLOS, P = .02. No patient with a negative HIDA scan developed a subsequent bile leak. CONCLUSIONS: NOM of BLIs is associated with lower mortality, but significant complications. Bile leaks are more common in patients with higher liver AIS, and in this study presented in only those with liver AIS > or = 4. HIDA scanning successfully diagnosed all patients with bile leaks and led to less invasive drainage procedures over time and shorter HLOS.

Impact of an inpatient rehabilitation facility on functional outcome and length of stay of burn survivors.

This study reviewed the use of an inpatient rehabilitation unit for burn survivors. We hypothesized that adult burn patients admitted earlier to inpatient rehabilitation have an equal or better functional outcome than those remaining in acute burn center for rehabilitation care. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data were prospectively collected on our burn center admissions dating January 2002 to August 2003. National rehabilitation data were acquired from eRehabData and burn literature. A total of 217 adult patients survived until hospital discharge, with 21 (9.7%) discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (REHAB). REHAB had larger burn injuries, more inhalation injuries, higher incidence hand/foot burns, and longer length of stay (LOS). REHAB had lower FIM upon rehabilitation facility admission than national averages but greater FIM improvement during comparable rehabilitation LOS. Although our earlier rehabilitation admission strategy results in more frequent rehabilitation unit referrals, patients had shorter burn center LOS and greater FIM improvement compared with limited national burn patient functional outcome data currently available.