RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer demonstrate a low overall survival even despite the established multimodal therapy as the current standard of care. Therefore, further biomarkers for patients with high-risk and additional therapy options are needed. NANOG is a transcription factor, which can be found in stem cells and is known to support tumorigenesis. METHODS: Six hundred sixty patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, who were operated at the University of Cologne with a curative intent, were included. Immunohistochemical stainings for NANOG were performed. The study population was divided into NANOG-positive and -negative subgroups. RESULTS: Positive NANOG expression correlates significantly with worse overall survival (p = 0.002) and could be confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse patient survival in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.09-1.80, p = 0.006). This effect could be detected in the subgroup of primarily operated patients, but not in patients after neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a NANOG-positive subgroup of patients with esophageal cancer, who exhibit worse overall survival in a large patient cohort. This discovery suggests the potential use of NANOG as a biomarker for both intensified therapy and stricter follow-up regimes. Additionally, NANOG-positive stem cell-like cancer cells could be used as a new antitumoral treatment target if validated in mechanistic and clinical studies.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Análise Multivariada , Células-Tronco/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Proteína Homeobox Nanog/genética , Proteína Homeobox Nanog/metabolismo , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent findings support the hypothesis of sex-related differences in inflammatory and immunological responses to trauma. The aim of this study was to address sex-specific aspects in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the German StuDoQ registry. Patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between 2010 and 2020 were stratified according to procedure (pancreatic head resection, distal pancreatectomy (DP), total pancreatectomy (TP)). Each cohort underwent propensity score matching (PSM) with the co-variables BMI, ASA, age, coronary heart disease (CHD), diabetes, hypertension with medication, and histology to level the distribution of co-morbidities between men and women. The main outcomes were morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The total cohort consisted of 10 224 patients (45.3 per cent women). Men had higher ASA grades, and more often had CHD, diabetes, and hypertension with medication. Women had fewer overall complications (57.3 versus 60.1 per cent; P = 0.005) and a lower mortality rate (3.4 versus 4.9 per cent; P < 0.001). Rates of pancreatic surgery-specific complications, such as clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (grade B/C: 14 versus 17 per cent; P < 0.001), delayed gastric emptying (grade B/C: 7.8 versus 9.2 per cent; P = 0.014), and postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (grade B/C: 7.1 versus 9.0 per cent; P < 0.001), were also lower in women. After PSM, 8358 patients were analysed. In the pancreatic head resection cohort (5318 patients), women had fewer complications (58.6 versus 61.4 per cent; P = 0.044), a lower in-hospital mortality rate (3.6 versus 6.1 per cent; P < 0.001), and less often had clinically relevant POPF (11.6 versus 16.2 per cent; P < 0.001). After DP, the clinically relevant POPF rate was lower in women (22.5 versus 27.3 per cent; P = 0.012). In the TP cohort, men more often developed intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage (5.0 versus 2.3 per cent; P = 0.050). CONCLUSION: Women had favourable outcomes after pancreatic surgery.
Assuntos
Hipertensão , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Masculino , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiologia , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease, and surgical resection remains the only curative treatment option. Unfortunately, upon primary diagnosis, only 15-20% of all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have localized disease that is eligible for operation. The remainder of patients either have borderline resectable or locally advanced disease or present with distant metastasis. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview regarding the current strategies and future directions in the multimodal therapy of locally advanced and oligometastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma and discuss the benefit of surgery following neoadjuvant therapy in these patients.
RESUMO
Today, individual prognosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) is based on post-surgical TNM staging and valid biomarkers are still not implemented. Integrin beta1 (ITGB1) is widely expressed in epithelial cells and promotes cell adhesion and growth. Its impact on tumor progression was described for different tumor entities before, data on its function as a potential biomarker in EAC is not available. Aim of the study is to evaluate the expression level of ITGB1 in a large collective of EAC and its impact on patients´ prognosis. 640 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were analyzed immunohistochemically for ITGB1. The data was correlated with long term outcome, clinical, pathological and molecular data (TP53, HER2/neu, c-myc, GATA6, PIK3CA and KRAS). Of 640 patients to be analyzed, 127 (19.8%) showed expression of ITGB1. ITGB1 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis, expression of integrin alphaV and KRAS mutation status. Patients with high ITGB1 expression showed impaired overall survival (22.5 months (95% CI 15.3-29.7 months), vs. 34.1 months (95% CI 25.3-42.4 months), P = 0.024). This effect was particularly evident in the group of patients undergoing primary surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy (10.2 months (95% CI 1.9-41.7 months) vs. 31.4 months (95% CI 21.1-144.2 months, P = 0.008). ITGB1 was also an independent prognostic marker in multivariable analysis (HR 1.696 (95% CI 1.084-2.653, P = 0.021) in patients that underwent primary surgery. We demonstrate for the first time the prognostic significance of ITGB1 expression in a large EAC patient population.