Efficacy of epidural analgesia for intractable cancer pain: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is a common technique for managing perioperative and obstetric pain. Patients with cancer who cannot tolerate opioids or not responding to conventional treatment may benefit from epidural analgesia. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with intractable cancer pain. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies on patients with cancer who received epidural analgesia. We assessed the quality of all included studies using the risk-of-bias tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was pain relief after epidural analgesia, and the secondary outcome was quality of life, analgesic consumption, and adverse events. The studies were grouped based on the medications used for epidural analgesia. A descriptive synthesis was performed following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guideline. RESULTS: Our systematic review included nine randomized controlled trials (n = 340) and 15 observational studies (n = 926). Two randomized controlled trials suggested that epidural opioids were not superior to systemic opioids in relieving pain. Epidural opioids combined with local anesthetics or adjuvants, including calcitonin, clonidine, ketamine, neostigmine, methadone, and dexamethasone, offered better analgesic effects. No significant difference in pain relief between an intermittent bolus and a continuous infusion of epidural morphine was observed. Epidural opioids had more analgesic effects on nociceptive pain than neuropathic pain. The methods used to evaluate the quality of life and the corresponding results were heterogeneous among studies. Six observational studies demonstrated that some patients could have decreased opioid consumption after epidural analgesia. Adverse events, including complications and drug-related side effects, were reported in 23 studies. Five serious complications, such as epidural abscess and hematoma, required surgical management. The heterogeneity and methodological limitations of the studies hindered meta-analysis and evidence-level determination. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of epidural opioids, local anesthetics, and adjuvants may provide better pain relief for intractable cancer pain. However, we must assess the patients to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks before epidural analgesia. Therefore, further high-quality studies are required.

R-Duloxetine and N-Methyl Duloxetine as Novel Analgesics Against Experimental Postincisional Pain.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressant S-duloxetine alleviates intractable pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and fibromyalgia. It also reduces both acute and persistent pain in various animal models. This study addresses whether the enantiomer, R-duloxetine, and the homolog, N-methyl duloxetine, could act as analgesics and whether they block neuronal Na⁺ channels. METHODS: The rat incision plus extension model on the dorsothoracic skin was applied to evoke postoperative mechanoallodynia and hyperalgesia, measured for 5 days postoperatively by local responses to von Frey filaments. R-Duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine were administered systemically (intraperitoneal) or locally (subcutaneous [SC]) 1 hour before the surgery. The block of Na currents in rat neuronal GH3 cells was determined under the whole-cell configuration. RESULTS: Ipsilateral SC injections (2 mg/0.4 mL) of R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine reduced both postoperative allodynia and hyperalgesia by approximately 89% to 99% in the area under the curve of skin responses next to incision over 5 days. Systemic intraperitoneal injections at a higher dosage (10 mg) had smaller analgesic effects (reduced by approximately 53%-69%), whereas contralateral SC injections (10 mg) were ineffective. Both R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine blocked neuronal Na⁺ currents, with a higher affinity for the inactivated than the resting states. In addition, both drugs elicited significant use-dependent block of Na currents when stimulated at 5 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: R-Duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine are highly effective against postoperative pain using the skin incision model, and they elicit both tonic and use-dependent block of neuronal Na⁺ channels. Our results suggest that R-duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine are applicable as novel analgesics.

The Local and Systemic Actions of Duloxetine in Allodynia and Hyperalgesia Using a Rat Skin Incision Pain Model.

BACKGROUND: Duloxetine is an antidepressant effective for major depressive disorder and also the alleviation of pain for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, chronic musculoskeletal pain, and fibromyalgia. How duloxetine works in pain relief remains unknown. In this study, we address whether duloxetine could act as an analgesic via systemic and local applications. METHODS: Efficacies of bupivacaine and duloxetine applied subcutaneously at the incision site against acute postoperative pain were compared after rat skin incision. Contralateral and intraperitoneal injections were used to assess systemic efficacy of duloxetine. Local anesthetic actions were assayed through functional block of the rat sciatic nerve. Inhibition by duloxetine of neuronal Na channels was characterized in rat GH3 cells. RESULTS: Our studies showed that subcutaneous duloxetine (2 mg) reduced hyperalgesia and allodynia for several days after skin incision, whereas subcutaneous bupivacaine (2 mg) did not. Contralaterally injected duloxetine (10 mg) had minimal effects on postoperative pain. Intraperitoneal duloxetine also reduced both allodynia and hyperalgesia, albeit at higher doses (10-20 mg). Duloxetine (2 mg) inhibited motor and nociceptive functions via sciatic nerve block for approximately 24 hours. It also reduced Na currents with 50% inhibitory concentrations of 30.4 ± 1.2 µM and 4.26 ± 0.19 µM (n = 8) for resting and fast-inactivated channels, respectively. Furthermore, duloxetine (10 µM) elicited additional use-dependent block of peak Na currents by approximately 70% when stimulated at 5 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that duloxetine can act as a local anesthetic and an analgesic drug via both local and systemic applications. Because duloxetine inhibits neuronal Na currents with high potency, it may exert its antihyperalgesic effects through inhibition of the spontaneous nerve impulses that result from peripheral injury, encompassing its actions on multiple central nervous system and peripheral targets.

Prolonged suppression of postincisional pain by a slow-release formulation of lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain can occur despite nerve blocks during the surgical period. Here we tested Xybrex (Orthocon, Inc., Irvington, NY), a slow-release formulation of lidocaine that blocks rat sciatic nerve for 1-2 days, for its ability to suppress postincisional pain. METHODS: A plantar paw incision was made in rats, either along the midline (Brennan model) or at the lateral edge, 30 min after different treatment groups received either lidocaine (0.2 ml, 2%) or Xybrex implant at the ipsilateral sciatic nerve or Xybrex at the contralateral sciatic nerve. Behavioral testing by von Frey filaments occurred at 2 and 6 h postoperatively and for the next 10 postoperative days. The fractional response (paw withdrawal responses per 10 pokes) was scored at each time. RESULTS: Mechanosensitivity from the Brennan paw incision was reduced throughout the postoperative period by ipsilateral Xybrex, although lidocaine injection almost had no effect. Contralateral Xybrex had a weaker but still significant antihyperalgesic effect, converging to that from ipsilateral Xybrex at postoperative day 2. Xybrex at the nuchal midline reduced allodynia for only postoperative days 1-3, whereas hyperalgesia was reduced continuously after postoperative day 2. Hyperalgesia from the lateral incision was also reduced by ipsilateral Xybrex but not by contralateral Xybrex. CONCLUSIONS: Implants of slow-release lidocaine formulations are most effective against postincisional pain when placed at the ipsilateral nerve innervating the area of incision. Contralateral nerve implants are somewhat less effective, probably acting by releasing lidocaine into the systemic circulation. There appears to be a differential role of central sensitization between postincisional allodynia and hyperalgesia.

The effects of resiniferatoxin in an experimental rat thoracotomy model.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after thoracotomy has been reproduced in a rat model that allows investigation of drugs that might reduce the incidence of allodynia after thoracotomy. Previous studies suggest that morphine, clonidine, neostigmine, gabapentin, and bupivacaine reduce the incidence of allodynia in the rat postthoracotomy pain model. One purpose of this study was to test whether intercostal injection of resiniferatoxin (RTX) decreased the amount of allodynia in an animal model of chronic postthoracotomy pain. We also tested whether RTX induced a transient mechanical hyperalgesic response in uninjured animals. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, and the right fourth and fifth ribs were surgically exposed. The pleura was opened, and the ribs were retracted. Intercostal RTX 0.8 or 8 microg was injected in animals that developed allodynia after surgery; a control group underwent rib retraction and received vehicle only. An additional group of uninjured animals received RTX. Rats were tested for mechanical allodynia at a predetermined area around the incision site for 3 wk. RESULTS: Allodynia developed in 42% of the animals that underwent thoracotomy. A transient hyperalgesic response was noted in the uninjured group that underwent drug injections. Intercostal RTX did not modify the course of allodynia in injured rats. DISCUSSION: The current results suggest that intercostal RTX causes a transient hyperalgesic response in uninjured animals and is ineffective in reducing the mechanical allodynia after thoracotomy.

The relationship between functional sciatic nerve block duration and the rate of release of lidocaine from a controlled-release matrix.

BACKGROUND: Nerve blocks of long duration are often desirable in perioperative and postoperative situations. The relationship between the duration of such blocks and the rate at which a local anesthetic is released is important to know for developing a localized drug delivery system that will optimize block duration. METHODS: Lidocaine concentration was varied in 1 series of formulations (OSB-L) containing a constant amount of release rate modifier. In another series (OST-R), the release rate modifier was varied while the lidocaine content was held constant. Release kinetics were measured in vitro and correlated to the in vivo duration of antinociceptive and motor block effects when the formulation was implanted next to the rat sciatic nerve. In parallel studies, rats receiving different formulations of slow-release lidocaine were fixed by intracardiac perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde and nerve-muscle tissue taken for histopathological analysis. RESULTS: In this study, we have demonstrated that the most important variable for effecting functional nerve block, i.e., the blockade of impulses in the relevant fibers of the sciatic nerve, is the rate of lidocaine release at that time. For the OSB-L formulations (lidocaine concentrations of 1.875%, 3.75%, 7.5%, and 15% at a constant release rate modifier of 5%), the average in vitro release rates at 50% recovery of motor block and nociceptive block were 0.91 +/- 0.28 and 1.75 +/- 0.61 mg/h, respectively. For the OST-R formulations (16% lidocaine with release rate modifier concentrations of 1.875%, 3.75%, 7.5%, and 15%), the average in vitro release rates at 50% recovery of motor block and nociceptive block were 2.33 +/- 1.39 and 4.34 +/- 1.09 mg/h, respectively. The OSB-L formulations showed a dose-dependent increase in block duration proportional to an increase in initial lidocaine concentration, whereas the OST-R formulations showed a nonmonotonic relationship between release rate modifier concentration and block duration. The histopathological studies at 24 hours, 3, 5, or 7 days, and 4 weeks after the implantation revealed inflammatory reactions with degrees correlated with lidocaine content, but limited to the connective tissue and muscle immediately surrounding the implanted material. Despite these observed inflammatory reactions, nociceptive and motor block function returned to normal, preimplantation values in all animals. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing initial lidocaine content proportionately increased the duration of functional sciatic nerve block. However, decreasing the release rate per se does not give a proportional increase in block duration. Instead, there seems to be an optimal, intermediate release rate for achieving the maximum duration of block.

Resiniferatoxin combined with antidepressants preferentially prolongs sensory/nociceptive block in rat sciatic nerve.

BACKGROUND: Current techniques of peripheral nerve block have major limitations, including lack of differentiation between motor and sensory fibers and potential toxicity of local anesthetics. Recent studies have suggested that a nociceptive-selective nerve block can be achieved via a transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 activator (capsaicin) along with local anesthetics. We hypothesized that the combination of potent transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 agonist resiniferatoxin (RTX) and selected antidepressants (amitriptyline, doxepin, and fluoxetine, also potent sodium channel blockers) would produce prolonged and predominantly sensory nerve block. METHODS: Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and 0.2 mL of amitriptyline, doxepin, or fluoxetine was deposited next to the surgically exposed sciatic nerves (n = 8 per group). Some animals received a second injection containing RTX (n = 8 per group). The effect of nerve block was assessed by neurobehavioral tests of the motor function (extensor postural thrust) and the nocifensive reaction (mechanical pinch). RESULTS: A single application of RTX produced nociceptive-selective sciatic nerve block, whereas antidepressants produced nociceptive and motor block. The combined administration of RTX and antidepressant resulted in a predominantly nociceptive nerve block. Compared with antidepressants or RTX alone, the combination prolonged the nociceptive nerve block more than the motor block. CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of RTX and antidepressants produced a markedly prolonged nociceptive peripheral nerve block in rat sciatic nerves compared with either agent alone. However, the 2-drug regimen also elicited prolonged blockade of the motor function, although disproportionately less compared with the nociceptive modality, suggesting the existence of nontransient receptor potential vanilloid type 1-mediated mechanisms. The mechanisms through which RTX affects nociceptive signal transduction/transmission have yet to be fully elucidated.

Coapplication of lidocaine and the permanently charged sodium channel blocker QX-314 produces a long-lasting nociceptive blockade in rodents.

BACKGROUND: Nociceptive-selective local anesthesia is produced by entry of the permanently charged lidocaine-derivative QX-314 into nociceptors when coadministered with capsaicin, a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel agonist. However, the pain evoked by capsaicin before establishment of the QX-314-mediated block would limit clinical utility. Because TRPV1 channels are also activated by lidocaine, the authors tested whether lidocaine can substitute for capsaicin to introduce QX-314 into nociceptors through TRPV1 channels and produce selective analgesia. METHODS: Lidocaine (0.5% [17.5 mM], 1% [35 mM], and 2% [70 mM]) alone, QX-314 (0.2% [5.8 mM]) alone, and a combination of the two were injected subcutaneously and adjacent to the sciatic nerve in rats and mice. Mechanical and thermal responsiveness were measured, as was motor block. RESULTS: Coapplication of 0.2% QX-314 with lidocaine prolonged the nociceptive block relative to lidocaine alone, an effect attenuated in TRPV1 knockout mice. The 0.2% QX-314 alone had no effect when injected intraplantary or perineurally, and it produced only weak short-lasting inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex. Perisciatic nerve injection of lidocaine with QX-314 produced a differential nociceptive block much longer than the transient motor block, lasting 2 h (for 1% lidocaine) to 9 h (2% lidocaine). Triple application of lidocaine, QX-314, and capsaicin further increased the duration of the differential block. CONCLUSIONS: Coapplication of lidocaine and its quaternary derivative QX-314 produces a long-lasting, predominantly nociceptor-selective block, likely by facilitating QX-314 entry through TRPV1 channels. Delivery of QX-314 into nociceptors by using lidocaine instead of capsaicin produces sustained regional analgesia without nocifensive behavior.

An absorbable local anesthetic matrix provides several days of functional sciatic nerve blockade.

BACKGROUND: Functional blockade of peripheral nerves is the primary objective of local anesthesia, and it is often desirable to have a persistent blockade, sustained throughout and beyond a surgical procedure. Current local anesthetics give effective analgesia for <8-12 h after a single bolus injection. We report on an implantable, controlled-release drug delivery system intended for use in bone and consisting of a Food and Drug Administration-approved matrix containing lidocaine that is capable of local delivery for several days. METHODS: Xybrex, an absorbable, controlled-release delivery system containing 16% (w/w) lidocaine, was implanted next to the sciatic nerve of male rats (300-350 gm), at lidocaine doses of 5.3, 10.6, 16, and 32 mg lidocaine per rat. For comparison, a lidocaine HCl solution (0.2 mL, 2% = 4 mg) was injected in close proximity to the sciatic nerve. Rats were assessed behaviorally for analgesia by a forceps pinch of the lateral digits, and for motor block by quantifying the extensor postural thrust. Potential neurotoxicity of sciatic nerves was evaluated histologically at 24 h, 4 days, and 4 wk after implantation. The kinetics of lidocaine's release from the matrix was measured in vitro by ultraviolet detection of lidocaine in samples collected at 2.5, 6.5, 20, and 24.25 h. RESULTS: Xybrex at the highest doses (300 and 600 mg/kg, containing 16 and 32 mg of lidocaine free base, respectively) provided complete analgesia to an intense pinch for 7.0 +/- 2.0 h, 6.9 +/- 1.7 h and partial analgesia for 60.0 +/- 5.4 h, 58.8 +/- 4.2 h, respectively, compared to 0.61 +/- 0.03 h of complete analgesia and 0.96 +/- 0.03 h of partial analgesia by sciatic block from the 2% lidocaine solution (containing 4 mg lidocaine). These same high doses of Xybrex produced complete motor block for 17.0 +/- 3.3 h, 17.6 +/- 3.3 h with full recovery in 352.0 +/- 55.7 h (14.7 +/- 2.3 days), 579.0 +/- 36.1 h (24.1 +/- 1.5 days) respectively. Data are reported as mean +/- SE. P < 0.001 for all Xybrex groups compared to the 2% lidocaine group. Minor local tissue inflammation/pathology, primarily in the connective tissue and muscle 0.1 mm adjacent to the nerve, was observed equally in animals treated with Xybrex and 2% lidocaine solution. There were no behavioral signs of systemic toxicity. The in vitro release followed exponential kinetics and its comparison to the time-course of functional nociceptive deficit implied that the duration of nociception represented the local, immediate interaction of lidocaine between the nerve and the matrix and not a cumulative effect of previously released drug. CONCLUSIONS: Xybrex is an absorbable, controlled-release drug delivery system that provides several days of analgesia for rat peripheral nerves without apparent significant local neurotoxicity or systemic toxicity.

Capsaicin combined with local anesthetics preferentially prolongs sensory/nociceptive block in rat sciatic nerve.

BACKGROUND: Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 channels integrate nociceptive stimuli and are predominantly expressed by unmyelinated C-fiber nociceptors, but not low-threshold mechanoreceptive sensory or motor fibers. A recent report showed that the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 channel agonist capsaicin allows a hydrophilic quaternary ammonium derivative of lidocaine, QX-314, to selectively block C fibers without motor block. The authors tested whether a similar differential block would be produced using amphipathic N-methyl amitriptyline, amitriptyline, bupivacaine, or lidocaine, either alone or together with 0.05% capsaicin, in a rat sciatic nerve block model. METHODS: Rats (n = 8/group) were anesthetized with sevoflurane, and 0.2 ml of drug was injected either alone or with capsaicin (simultaneously or 10 min later) next to the sciatic nerve in the sciatic notch. Motor function was assessed by the extensor postural thrust. Nociception was evaluated by the nocifensive withdrawal reflex and vocalization evoked by pinch of a skin fold over the lateral metatarsus (cutaneous pain) with a serrated forceps. RESULTS: N-Methyl amitriptyline, amitriptyline, bupivacaine, or lidocaine, followed by injection of capsaicin 10 min later, each elicited a predominantly nociceptive-specific blockade. In comparison, simultaneous application of each local anesthetic with capsaicin did not elicit a clinically significant differential block, with the exception of N-methyl amitriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: Both tertiary amine local anesthetics and their quaternary ammonium derivatives can elicit a predominantly sensory/nociceptor selective block when followed by injection of capsaicin. The combined application of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 channel agonists and various local anesthetics or their quaternary ammonium derivatives is an appealing strategy to achieve a long-lasting differential block in regional analgesia.

Low-dose systemic bupivacaine prevents the development of allodynia after thoracotomy in rats.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after thoracotomy has been recently reproduced in a rat model that allows investigation of the effect of drugs that might reduce the incidence of allodynia after thoracotomy. Previous studies suggest that intrathecal or systemic morphine, clonidine, neostigmine, and gabapentin reduce the incidence of allodynia in the rat postthoracotomy pain model. Our purpose was to test whether intercostal and systemic injection of bupivacaine prevented the development of allodynia in an animal model of chronic intercostal neuropathic pain. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and the right 4th and 5th ribs surgically exposed. The pleura were opened and the ribs were retracted for 1 h. Intercostal or systemic bupivacaine 1 mg (0.2 mL at 0.5%) was injected before and after surgery, or before surgery; a control group underwent rib retraction and did not receive any drug. Rats were tested for mechanical allodynia at a predetermined area around the incision site during the 3 wk after surgery. RESULTS: Allodynia developed in 43% of the animals that did not receive bupivacaine (control group); in contrast, allodynia developed in only 6%, 12%, and 12% of those animals that received intercostal bupivacaine before surgery, after surgery, or systemically before surgery, respectively. DISCUSSION: Previous studies suggest that allodynia after rib retraction can be prevented by opioids, alpha2-adrenergic agonists, neostigmine, and gabapentin. The current results suggest that bupivacaine is effective in preventing mechanical allodynia, whether given by intercostal injection before or after surgery, or systemically before surgery.

Use of bulleyaconitine A as an adjuvant for prolonged cutaneous analgesia in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Bulleyaconitine A (BLA) is an analgesic and antiinflammatory drug isolated from Aconitum plants. BLA has several potential targets, including voltage-gated Na+ channels. We tested whether BLA elicited long-lasting cutaneous analgesia, when co-injected with lidocaine and epinephrine, as a model for prolonged infiltration anesthesia. METHODS: The local anesthetic properties of BLA were assessed by the patch-clamp technique in HEK293t cells expressing Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 neuronal Na+ channels, both crucial for nociception. Drug solutions (0.6 mL) were injected subcutaneously via rat shaved dorsal skin. Inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex was evaluated by pinpricks. Skin cross-sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or with antibodies against PGP9.5. RESULTS: BLA at 10 microM interacted minimally with resting or inactivated Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 Na+ channels when infrequently stimulated to +50 mV for 3 ms. However, when stimulated at 2 Hz for 1000 pulses, their peak Na+ currents were >90% reduced by BLA. This use-dependent inhibition was not significantly reversed after 15-min washing. Complete nociceptive blockade after injection of lidocaine (0.5%)/epinephrine (1:200,000) lasted for approximately 1 h in rats; full recovery occurred after approximately 6 h. Co-injection of 0.125 mM BLA with lidocaine/epinephrine increased the duration of complete nociceptive blockade to 24 h. Full recovery occurred after approximately 6 days. Skin histology including peripheral nerve fibers appeared unaffected by BLA. CONCLUSIONS: BLA inhibits Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 Na+ currents in a use-dependent manner. Co-injection of BLA at

Magnesium sulfate diminishes the effects of amide local anesthetics in rat sciatic-nerve block.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) is well known as an antagonist of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and was used for intrathecal analgesia a century ago. However, the effects of MgSO(4) combined with local anesthetics (LAs) on peripheral nerves are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that MgSO(4) could be used as an adjuvant to prolong and intensify conduction block by amide-type LAs in a rat sciatic-nerve block model. Further, the mechanism of possible synergy between LAs and MgSO(4) was investigated in whole-cell mode patch-clamp experiments. METHODS: Sciatic nerves were exposed to 2%/73.9 mM lidocaine, 0.25%/7.7 mM bupivacaine, and 0.5%/15.4 mM ropivacaine, with or without addition of 1.25%, 2.5%, or 5% MgSO(4)/50.7 mM, and nerve block characteristics were assessed. To elucidate the LA-MgSO(4) interaction, voltage-dependent inactivation curves were determined in cultured rat GH(3) cells that expressed neuronal Na(+) channels. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, the addition of MgSO(4) overall significantly shortened the duration of block by lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine. The steady-state inactivation of Na(+) channels in the presence of 300 muM lidocaine was almost unchanged by the addition of 10 mM MgSO(4), indicating that MgSO(4) does not affect the potency of lidocaine toward the inactivated Na(+) channel. CONCLUSIONS: MgSO(4) coadministered with amide-type LAs shortened the duration of sciatic-nerve block in rats. Therefore, it does not seem to be useful as an adjuvant for peripheral-nerve block. The mechanism of this observed antagonism is unclear but appears to be independent of the action of LAs and MgSO(4) at the LA receptor within the Na(+) channel.

Enduring prevention and transient reduction of postoperative pain by intrathecal resolvin D1.

Postoperative pain slows surgical recovery, impacting the return of normal function for weeks, months, or longer. Here we report the antihyperalgesic actions of a new compound, resolvin D1 (RvD1), known to reduce inflammation and to suppress pain after peripheral nerve injury, on the acute pain occurring after paw incision and the prolonged pain after skin-muscle retraction. Injection of RvD1 (20-40ng) into the L5-L6 intrathecal space 30minutes before surgery reduces the postincisional primary mechanical hypersensitivity, lowering the peak change by approximately 70% (with 40ng) and reducing the area under the curve (AUC) for the entire 10-day postincisional course by approximately 60%. Intrathecal injection of RvD1 on postoperative day (POD) 1 reduces the hyperalgesia to the same level as that from preoperative injection within a few hours, an effect that persists for the remaining PODs. Tactile allodynia and hyperalgesia following the skin/muscle incision retraction procedure, measured at the maximum values 12 to 14days, is totally prevented by intrathecal RvD1 (40ng) given at POD 2. However, delaying the injection until POD 9 or POD 17 results in RvD1 causing only transient and incomplete reversal of hyperalgesia, lasting for <1day. These findings demonstrate the potent, effective reduction of postoperative pain by intrathecal RvD1 given before or shortly after surgery. The much more limited effect of this compound on retraction-induced pain, when given 1 to 2weeks later, suggests that the receptors or pathways for resolvins are more important in the early than the later stages of postoperative pain. Single intrathecal injections of resolvin D1 in rats before or 1 to 2days after surgery strongly reduce postoperative pain for several weeks.

Prolonged cutaneous analgesia with transdermal application of amitriptyline and capsaicin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Capsaicin selectively binds to TRPV1, the vanilloid subtype 1 of the superfamily of transient receptor potential ion channels, which is highly expressed in pain-transmitting C fibers. Recent reports have demonstrated that the coadministration of capsaicin with a local anesthetic (LA) at the rat sciatic nerve elicits a prolonged nociceptive-selective nerve block, suggesting that activation of the TRPV1 receptor may allow LAs to enter the nerve through the TRPV1 pore. In previous studies, we demonstrated that transdermal amitriptyline achieves clinical analgesic effects and is more potent than lidocaine. Here we examine whether the combined application of amitriptyline and capsaicin as a transdermal patch will produce prolonged cutaneous analgesia compared with amitriptyline alone. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weights 250-300 g) were assigned to five treatment groups (n = 6-8 per group). Transdermal patches containing amitriptyline with different concentrations of capsaicin were applied for 3 hrs to rats' shaved backs: 2.5% amitriptyline alone (control group) and in combination with 0.05%, 0.15%, 1%, and 8% capsaicin. Behavioral testing for cutaneous nociception was conducted before drug application and after patch removal using the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex. In addition, skin appearance was assessed to determine irritation by these formulations. RESULTS: The cutaneous analgesic effect is significantly prolonged when amitriptyline is applied in combination with 8% capsaicin. Amitriptyline alone provided a complete block to pinprick for 4.5 hrs, and the time to full recovery was 96 hrs. Amitriptyline with 8% capsaicin produced a complete block to pinprick for 6 to 9 hrs, and the time to full recovery was 216 hrs (P = 0.002). Amitriptyline alone causes toxic effects in skin, whereas the higher the concentration of capsaicin, the less skin irritation was noted, and the combination of amitriptyline 2.5% with capsaicin 8% caused no adverse skin reactions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the combined application of amitriptyline and capsaicin results in prolonged cutaneous analgesia compared with amitriptyline alone, suggesting that the activation of the TRPV1 channel by capsaicin facilitates the passage of amitriptyline into nociceptors. This transdermal patch achieves far longer cutaneous analgesia than currently available patch applications such as EMLA cream. The mechanism that underlies the lesser skin irritation noted when amitriptyline is combined with higher doses of capsaicin compared with amitriptyline alone is unclear and may be related to a counteraction of amitriptyline-induced vasoconstriction.

Bulleyaconitine A isolated from aconitum plant displays long-acting local anesthetic properties in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Bulleyaconitine A (BLA) is an active ingredient of Aconitum bulleyanum plants. BLA has been approved for the treatment of chronic pain and rheumatoid arthritis in China, but its underlying mechanism remains unclear. METHODS: The authors examined (1) the effects of BLA on neuronal voltage-gated Na channels in vitro under the whole cell patch clamp configuration and (2) the sensory and motor functions of rat sciatic nerve after single BLA injections in vivo. RESULTS: BLA at 10 microm did not affect neuronal Na currents in clonal GH3 cells when stimulated infrequently to +50 mV. When stimulated at 2 Hz for 1,000 pulses (+50 mV for 4 ms), BLA reduced the peak Na currents by more than 90%. This use-dependent reduction of Na currents by BLA reversed little after washing. Single injections of BLA (0.2 ml at 0.375 mm) into the rat sciatic notch not only blocked sensory and motor functions of the sciatic nerve but also induced hyperexcitability, followed by sedation, arrhythmia, and respiratory distress. When BLA at 0.375 mm was coinjected with 2% lidocaine (approximately 80 mm) or epinephrine (1:100,000) to reduce drug absorption by the bloodstream, the sensory and motor functions of the sciatic nerve remained fully blocked for approximately 4 h and regressed completely after approximately 7 h, with minimal systemic effects. CONCLUSIONS: BLA reduces neuronal Na currents strongly at +50 mV in a use-dependent manner. When coinjected with lidocaine or epinephrine, BLA elicits prolonged block of both motor and sensory functions in rats with minimal adverse effects.

Inhibition of Nav1.7 and Nav1.4 sodium channels by trifluoperazine involves the local anesthetic receptor.

The calmodulin (CaM) inhibitor trifluoperazine (TFP) can produce analgesia when given intrathecally to rats; however, the mechanism is not known. We asked whether TFP could modulate the Na(v)1.7 sodium channel, which is highly expressed in the peripheral nervous system and plays an important role in nociception. We show that 500 nM and 2 muM TFP induce major decreases in Na(v)1.7 and Na(v)1.4 current amplitudes and that 2 muM TFP causes hyperpolarizing shifts in the steady-state inactivation of Na(v)1.7 and Na(v)1.4. CaM can bind to the C-termini of voltage-gated sodium channels and modulate their functional properties; therefore we investigated if TFP modulation of sodium channels was due to CaM inhibition. However, the TFP inhibition was not replicated by whole cell dialysis of a calmodulin inhibitory peptide, indicating that major effects of TFP do not involve a disruption of CaM-channel interactions. Rather, our data show that TFP inhibition is state dependent and that the majority of the TFP inhibition depends on specific amino-acid residues in the local anesthetic receptor site in sodium channels. TFP was also effective in vivo in causing motor and sensory blockade after subfascial injection to the rat sciatic nerve. The state-dependent block of Na(v)1.7 channels with nanomolar concentrations of TFP raises the possibility that TFP, or TFP analogues, might be useful for regional anesthesia and pain management and could be more potent than traditional local anesthetics.