Intrafractional vaginal dilation in anal cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy (DILANA) - a prospective, randomized, 2-armed phase-II-trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anal cancer is rising in the last decades and more women are affected than men. The prognosis after chemoradiation is very good with complete remission rates of 80-90%. Thus, reducing therapy-related toxicities and improving quality of life are of high importance. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques like IMRT (Intensity-modulated radiotherapy), the incidence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal toxicities has already been reduced. However, especially in female anal cancer patients genital toxicities like vaginal fibrosis and stenosis are of great relevance, too. Up to now, there are no prospective data reporting incidence rates, techniques of prevention or impact on quality of life. The aim of the DILANA trial is to evaluate the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis, to optimize radiotherapy by reducing dose to the vaginal wall to minimize genital toxicities and improve quality of life of anal cancer patients. METHODS: The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, two-armed, open, single-center phase-II-trial. Sixty patients will be randomized into one of two arms, which differ only in the diameter of a tampon used during treatment. All patients will receive standard (chemo) radiation with a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy to the pelvic and inguinal nodes with a boost to the anal canal up to 54-60 Gy. The primary objective is the assessment of the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis 12 months after (chemo) radiation depending on the extent of vaginal dilation. Secondary endpoints are toxicities according to the CTC AE version 5.0 criteria, assessment of clinical feasibility of daily use of a tampon, assessment of compliance for the use of a vaginal dilator and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Prospective studies are needed evaluating the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis after (chemo) radiation in female anal cancer patients. Furthermore, the assessment of techniques to reduce the incidence of vaginal fibrosis like intrafractional vaginal dilation as well as other radiotherapy-independent methods like using a vaginal dilator are essential. Additionally, implementation of a systematic assessment of vaginal stenosis is necessary to grant reproducibility and comparability of future data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04094454, 19.09.2019).

Bone Marrow Sparing by Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy in Postoperative Irradiation of Gynecologic Malignancies.

Purpose: The aim of this matched-pair cohort study was to evaluate the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for sparring of the pelvic bone marrow and thus reduction of hematotoxicity compared to intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) in the setting of postoperative irradiation of gynaecological malignancies. Secondary endpoint was the assessment of predictive parameters for the occurrence of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) when applying IMPT. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts were analyzed consisting of 25 patients each. Patients were treated with IMPT compared with IMRT and had uterine cervical (n = 8) or endometrial cancer (n = 17). Dose prescription, patient age, and diagnosis were matched. Dosimetric parameters delivered to the whole pelvic skeleton and subsites (ilium, lumbosacral, sacral, and lower pelvis) and hematological toxicity were evaluated. MRI follow-up for evaluation of SIF was only available for the IMPT group. Results: In the IMPT group, integral dose to the pelvic skeleton was significantly lower (23.4GyRBE vs 34.3Gy; p < 0.001), the average V5Gy, V10Gy, and V20Gy were reduced by 40%, 41%, and 28%, respectively, compared to the IMRT group (p < 0.001). In particular, for subsites ilium and lower pelvis, the low dose volume was significantly lower. Hematotoxicity was significantly more common in the IMRT group (80% vs 32%; p = 0009), especially hematotoxicity ≥ CTCAE II (36% vs 8%; p = 0.037). No patient in the IMPT group experienced hematotoxicity > CTCAE II. In the IMPT cohort, 32% of patients experienced SIF. Overall SIF occurred more frequently with a total dose of 50.4 GyRBE (37.5%) compared to 45 GyRBE (22%). No significant predictive dose parameters regarding SIF could be detected aside from a trend regarding V50Gy to the lumbosacral subsite. Conclusion: Low-dose exposure to the pelvic skeleton and thus hematotoxicity can be significantly reduced by using IMPT compared to a matched photon cohort. Sacral insufficiency fracture rates appear similar to reported rates for IMRT in the literature.

Treatment Tolerability and Toxicity of Postoperative Proton Beam Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: Results of the Prospective Phase 2 APROVE Trial.

PURPOSE: The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-2 study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5 to 6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) fractions weekly using active raster-scanning intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life, and PFS. RESULTS: All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range, 33 to 51 days). No patient developed gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity ≥grade 3, and the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided P value P = .0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range, 20.2 to 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95% confidence interval: 33.37 to 46.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients, with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection.

Health-related quality of life and patient-reported symptoms after postoperative proton beam radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer: 2-year results of the prospective phase II APROVE-trial.

INTRODUCTION: The APROVE-trial investigated the tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with cervical or endometrial cancer. The present analysis evaluated the secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms. METHODS: 25 patients were included in this prospective phase-II-trial and treated with postoperative radiotherapy using protons alone or in combination with chemotherapy. To attain general and gynecologic-specific HRQOL measures, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires combined with -QLQ-CX24 for cervical and -QLQ-EN24 for endometrial cancer were assessed at baseline, at the end of RT and up to 2 years after radiotherapy. The results were compared to an age-matched norm reference population. Symptoms were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and institutional patient-reported symptoms grading. RESULTS: Scores regarding global health status were markedly impaired at baseline (mean: 58.0 ± 20.1) compared to reference population data, but significantly (p = 0.036) improved and evened out to comparable norm values 2 years after proton therapy (mean: 69.9 ± 19.3). Treatment caused acute and long-term worsening of pain (p = 0.048) and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.016) for women with endometrial cancer, but no higher-grade CTCAE ≥ 3° toxicity was observed. Dosimetric evaluation of rectum, sigmoid, large and small bowel showed no correlation with the reported gastrointestinal symptoms. After 2 years, fatigue had significantly improved (p = 0.030), whereas patients with cervical cancer experienced more often lymphedema (p = 0.017). Scores for endometrial cancer pertaining to sexual activity (p = 0.048) and body image (p = 0.022) had improved post treatment; in the latter this effect persisted after 2 years. CONCLUSION: Proton beam therapy in the adjuvant setting was well tolerated with only low-grade side effects concerning gastrointestinal symptoms, lymphedema and pain. Overall quality of life was impaired at baseline, but patients were able to recover to values comparable to norm population 2 years after proton therapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm whether the benefit of proton therapy translates into a clinical effect. Sexual dysfunction remains an important issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03184350, 09th June 2017).

Evaluation of Uterine Brachytherapy as Primary Treatment Option for Elderly Patients with Medically Inoperable Endometrial Cancer-A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

We aimed to gain more evidence regarding the feasibility, toxicity, and oncological outcome of primary brachytherapy in patients with medically inoperable endometrial cancer. Thirteen patients receiving primary brachytherapy ± external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for endometrial cancer due to medical inoperability were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local failure-free survival (LFFS). Univariate outcome analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Peri-interventional complications, acute and chronic toxicities were evaluated. Additionally, we performed a Pubmed search and review of the literature of the last 10 years. Mean age at time of diagnosis was 73.9 years (60.4-87.1 years). Eleven patients were staged FIGO IA/B and one patient each with FIGO IIIA and IIIC. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 2-/5-year LFFS were 76.2%/56.4%, respectively. High grading correlated with a worse LFFS (p = 0.069). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 2-/5-year PFS were 76.9%/53.8% and 2-/5-year-OS were 76.9%/69.2%, respectively. No acute toxicities > grade II and only two late toxicities grade II/III occurred. We observed three peri-interventional complications. The available evidence suggests high rates of local control after definitive brachytherapy for inoperable endometrial cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. Definitive brachytherapy +/- EBRT should be considered as the preferred approach for this patient group.