F@#$ pain! A mini-review of the hypoalgesic effects of swearing.

Swearing, or the use of taboo language, has been repeatedly shown to induce hypoalgesia. While reliable hypoalgesic effects have been observed across studies, the mechanisms by which swearing influences pain and the optimal dosage of swearing remain poorly understood. Plausible mechanistic rationale for swearing's impact on pain include sympathetic response, emotion, humor, distraction, aggression, state disinhibition, psychological flow, risky behavior, and self-confidence. It remains unknown how the intensity of the swear word, speech volume, frequency, or timing influences pain modulation. While the majority of evidence demonstrates the efficacy of swearing at attenuating acute pain responses, these studies have utilized healthy populations with controlled experiments in laboratory settings. Comparatively, less is known about how laboratory findings translate practically/clinically to diverse populations, various dosages, and different pain chronicities. A greater understanding of mechanistic underpinnings and practical implications are necessary to feasibly implement swearing as a therapeutic modality to combat pain. The purpose of the following mini-review is to provide an overview of the current evidence on swearing for the reduction of pain, speculate on plausible underlying mechanisms, and discuss the potential for optimization of swearing for real-world translation. Lastly, identifying knowledge gaps to aid in directing future research will be discussed.

A PHYSICAL THERAPIST WHO SWEARS: A CASE SERIES.

Objective: Swearing deserves attention in the physical therapy setting due to its potential positive psychological, physiological, and social effects. The purpose of this case series is to describe 2 cases in which a physical therapist swears in the clinical setting and its effect on therapeutic alliance. Patients: Case 1 is a 19-year-old male treated for a hamstring strain, and case 2 is a 23-year-old male treated post-operatively for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The physical therapist utilized social swearing in the clinic with the goal of motivating the patient and enhancing the social connection with the patient, to improve therapeutic alliance. Results: The patient in case 1 reported a decrease in therapeutic alliance after the physical therapist began swearing during physical therapy treatments, whereas the patient in case 2 reported an increase in therapeutic alliance. Both patients disagreed that physical therapist swearing is unprofessional and disagreed that swearing is offensive, and both patients agreed physical therapists should be able to swear around their patients. Conclusion: Physical therapist swearing may have positive and negative influences in the clinic setting and may not be considered unprofessional. These are, to our knowledge, the first published cases of a physical therapist swearing in the clinical setting.

The influence of body painting on L4 spinous process palpation accuracy in novice palpators.

OBJECTIVES: Current literature remains inconclusive regarding the best methodology to accurately palpate lumbar spinous processes (SP). Body painting (BP) uses markers to draw anatomical structures on the skin's surface. While BP can be a useful tool for engaging learners, it is unknown whether it improves palpation accuracy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of body painting to palpation education improves lumbar spinous process palpation accuracy in first-year Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. METHODS: Thirty-eight DPT students were randomized into a traditional palpation group and a body painting (BP) group. Each group received identical instruction on palpating the lumbar spine, with the BP group additionally drawing lumbar SPs on their laboratory partner with a marker. Students were then assessed on their ability to accurately palpate the L4 SP on randomly assigned subjects. Two Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) used ultrasound imaging to confirm the location of each student's palpation. Palpation time was also recorded. The BP group also completed a survey on the learning experience. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of students were able to accurately palpate the L4 SP. There was no significant difference (p = 0.78) in palpation accuracy between the traditional and BP group, although students in the BP group were randomly assigned subjects with a significantly (p = 0.005) higher BMI. Ninety-five percent of students were able to palpate within one spinal level of the L4 SP. Students in the BP group reported that the BP activity facilitated learning and active participation. There was no significant difference in palpation time (p = 0.98) between groups. There was a fair correlation (r=-0.41) between palpation accuracy and subject BMI. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: While body painting was an enjoyable activity to incorporate into palpation laboratory, it is unclear whether it enhanced lumbar SP palpation accuracy in first-year DPT students.

Using expletives to enhance therapeutic outcomes: A case report.

Background: Swearing deserves attention in the physical therapy setting due to its potential positive effects on pain, physical performance, and therapeutic alliance. The purpose of this case report is to describe the strategic use of swearing in the clinical setting. Case Presentation: A 44-year-old female completed an episode of physical therapy after undergoing patellofemoral arthroplasty. Swearing was formally included into the plan of care, and the patient swore out loud during the most challenging and painful interventions. Results: The patient reported that repeating a swear word was funny, distracted the patient, and made the patient feel more confident. The patient and physical therapist self-reported a strong therapeutic alliance. Conclusion: There is evidence repeating a swear word out loud can strengthen the therapeutic alliance, improve physical performance, and decrease pain. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of a patient swearing during an episode of physical therapy care.

Frankly, we do give a damn: improving patient outcomes with swearing.

BACKGROUND: Words can change the way a patient thinks, feels, and performs. Swearing, or uttering a word that is considered taboo, is an often-ignored part of our language, even though over 50% of the population swears "sometimes" or "often". If used correctly, within a biopsychosocial approach to care, swearing has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes. DISCUSSION: Swearing can create tighter human bonds and enhance the therapeutic alliance between a patient and a physical therapist. Improvements in social pain, physical pain tolerance, and physical pain threshold can occur by strategic swearing by our patients. Even physical performance measures, such as power and force could be enhanced if patients swear. CONCLUSION: Although the mechanism by which swearing is effective is unclear, swearing deserves attention in the physical therapy setting based on evidence indicating potential positive effects on patient outcomes.

Lifting Techniques: Why Are We Not Using Evidence To Optimize Movement?

Lifting something off the ground is an essential task and lifting is a documented risk factor for low back pain (LBP). The standard lifting techniques are stoop (lifting with your back), squat (lifting with your legs), and semi-squat (midway between stoop and squat). Most clinicians believe the squat technique is optimal; however, training on squat lifting does not prevent LBP and utilizing greater lumbar flexion (i.e. stoop) when lifting is not a risk factor for LBP. The disconnect between what occurs in clinical practice and what the evidence suggests has resulted in ongoing debate. Clinicians must ask the right questions in order to apply the evidence appropriately. A proposed clinical framework of calm tissue down, build tissue up, improve work capacity can be used to determine which lifting technique is optimal for a patient at any given time. When applying this clinical framework, clinicians should consider metabolic, biomechanical, physical stress tolerance, and pain factors in order to address the movement system. For example, stoop lifting is more metabolically efficient and less challenging to the cardiopulmonary system. There may be few biomechanical differences in spinal postures and gross loads on the lumbar spine between stoop, squat, and semi-squat lifting; however, each lift has distinct kinematic patterns that affects muscle activation patterns, and ultimately the movement system. Clinicians must find the optimal dosage of physical stress to address all aspects of the movement system to minimize the risk of injury. There is no universal consensus on the optimal lifting technique which will satisfy every situation; however, there may be a lifting technique that optimizes movement to achieve a specific outcome. The calm tissue down, build tissue up, improve work capacity framework offers an approach to determine the best lifting technique for an individual patient at any give time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

THE MANAGEMENT OF PROXIMAL HAMSTRING TENDINOPATHY IN A COMPETITIVE POWERLIFTER WITH HEAVY SLOW RESISTANCE TRAINING - A CASE REPORT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proximal hamstring tendinopathy is a chronic, overuse condition that commonly develops in athletes. Eccentric exercise has been widely accepted in the clinic as the treatment of choice for the management of tendinopathies. However, this form of treatment has seldom been compared to other forms of load-based management for hamstring tendinopathies. Heavy slow resistance training, which consists of both concentric and eccentric phases, increases the loading time experienced by the tendon compared to eccentric only exercises. Heavy slow resistance training has achieved positive clinical results in the management of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this case report is to describe the outcomes of a powerlifter with proximal hamstring tendinopathy who responded favorably to a heavy slow resistance biased rehabilitation program after traditional, conservative management failed to alleviate symptoms. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 31-year-old male competitive powerlifter was seen in physical therapy for the management of proximal hamstring tendinopathy. The subject had experienced long duration pain localized at the ischial tuberosity combined with hip weakness that limited his ability to lift weigtht and sit for longer than 30 minutes. Treatment included a 12-week heavy slow resistance program with the focus of increasing load intensity. OUTCOMES: Numeric pain-rating scale was assessed at baseline, after a 12-week heavy slow resistance protocol, and 12 months post protocol. Within four weeks of starting the heavy slow resistance program, the subject noted a meaningful decrease in pain. The subject experienced clinically important improvements in numeric pain-rating scale immediately after the protocol and these improvements remained 12 months after completing the protocol. The subject was able to return to competitive powerlifting after the 12-week program. DISCUSSION: A meaningful change in pain occurred within four weeks of starting the program and continued improvement throughout the remainder of the 12 weeks with outcomes maintained 12 months after completing the program suggests that increasing the loading strategy with a heavy slow resistance program was helpful for this subject. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.