Topical antimicrobials in combination with admission screening and barrier precautions to control endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Intensive Care Unit.

We aimed to establish whether screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and body decontamination upon admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), in combination with barrier precautions, reduced rates of MRSA infection acquired on the unit. This was an interrupted time series study employing segmented regression analysis of data collected for all patients admitted to a 16-bed adult ICU over 48 months. Before the intervention (24 months; 1232 patients (44% female)), MRSA was sought from clinical cultures only and positive patients were barrier nursed in isolation. During the intervention (24 months; 1421 patients (54% female)), all ICU patients were screened for MRSA on admission and were barrier nursed in single rooms when established as MRSA-positive; all were given topical nasal anti-MRSA preparations and daily bed baths with 4% chlorhexidine throughout their stay. Changes in the proportion of patients colonised or infected with MRSA in the ICU were assessed. Before the intervention, 193 new MRSA cases (16%) were identified from 1232 ICU admissions; during the intervention, this was reduced to 92 cases (6%) of 1421 admissions. By time series regression analysis, the proportion of patients with MRSA decreased by 11.38% from ca. 15% to ca. 5% (ca. three-fold reduction) (95% confidence interval 3.5-19.3%; P=0.005). Thus, treatment of 11 patients prevented 1 clinical case of MRSA. Mean length of stay decreased significantly (P<0.001). Although MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteraemia rates dropped, the changes detected were not statistically significant. The proportion of patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia decreased significantly (P<0.001) and the trend changed from increasing to decreasing (P<0.001), as did the trend in glycopeptide use (P=0.014). An inexpensive and easy to implement intervention to control MRSA in the ICU was highly successful without compromising antimicrobial susceptibility.

The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review.

Screening women for lower genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is important in the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. This systematic review aims to state clearly which of the available diagnostic tests for the detection of C. trachomatis would be most effective in terms of clinical effectiveness. The review included all studies published from 1990 onward that evaluated diagnostic tests in asymptomatic, young, sexually active populations. Medline and Embase were searched electronically and key journals were hand-searched. Further studies were identified through the Internet and contact with experts in the field. All studies were reviewed by two reviewers and were scored by Irwig's assessment criteria. Additional quality assessment criteria included a documented sexual history and recording of previous chlamydial infection. The reviews were subjected to meta-analysis and meta-regression. The 30 studies that were included examined three types of DNA-based test--ligase chain reaction (LCR), PCR and gene probe--as well as enzyme immuno-assay (EIA). The results showed that while specificities were high, sensitivities varied widely across the tests and were also dependent on the specimen tested. Pooled sensitivities for LCR, PCR, gene probe and EIA on urine were 96.5%, 85.6%, 92% and 38%, respectively, while on cervical swabs the corresponding sensitivities of PCR, gene probe and EIA were 88.6%, 84% and 65%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that DNA amplification techniques performed best for both urine and swabs in low prevalence populations. We conclude that nucleic acid amplification tests used on non-invasive samples such as urine are more effective at detecting asymptomatic chlamydial infection than conventional tests, but there are few data to relate a positive result with clinical outcome.