Nondiagnostic category of Milan System for Reporting Pediatric Salivary Gland Cytopathology: outcomes and root cause analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) results classified as the nondiagnostic category of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) may be infrequently encountered in children. Clinical management may be challenging due to lack of data regarding outcomes and underlying causes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 106 consecutive pediatric salivary gland FNAs (2000-2020; 45% performed under image guidance). The outcomes of patients with nondiagnostic results were analyzed. Clinical parameters, FNA procedural parameters, and histopathologic parameters were compared between diagnostic and nondiagnostic cases. A root cause analysis was performed using the fishbone diagram and the 5 Whys method. RESULTS: A total of 103 initial FNAs were identified. The nondiagnostic rates for initial and repeat biopsy were 16% (16/103) and 67% (2/3), respectively. Initial nondiagnostic FNAs were most frequently managed by clinical/radiologic follow-up only (56%, 9/16), followed by direct surgery (19%, 3/16) and repeat FNA (19%, 3/16). By histologic and clinical/radiologic follow-up, the risk of malignancy for nondiagnostic cases was zero. Palpation guidance (P < .05), inadequate sampling determined by rapid on-site evaluation (P < .01), and lesions with cystic, vascular, or diffuse nature (P < .05) were significantly associated with nondiagnostic results. By root cause analysis, proceduralist sampling error and lack of ultrasound guidance were the most common primary and secondary causes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric salivary gland lesions of the nondiagnostic MSRSGC category have minimal risk of malignancy and may be successfully managed by clinical/radiologic follow-up. The root causes for nondiagnostic results were often multifactorial and primarily related to proceduralist sampling, characteristics of the lesions, and lack of ultrasound guidance.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Pediatric Salivary Gland Tumors: Analysis of Patient Tolerability, Sedation Requirement, and Procedural Complication.

OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool recommended by consensus management guidelines for preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors in adults. However, its utility in the pediatric population remains debated due to a paucity of data and inherited challenges of pediatric management (patient cooperation, the need for sedation, and procedural complications). METHODS: Consecutive series of 92 FNA biopsies of pediatric salivary gland lesions with available procedural data were included for retrospective analysis. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (68%) tolerated FNA without sedation. Sedation need was significantly associated with younger age, concurrent non-FNA procedure requiring sedation, ultrasound guidance, interventional radiologist as the proceduralist, and radiology suite as the facility setting. The sedation rates for children, and early, middle, and late adolescents were 69%, 32%, 12%, and 10%, respectively, with an optimal cutoff point of ≤12 years for age derived from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. No significant procedural complications were observed. Sedation did not provide significantly better diagnostic yield. CONCLUSION: FNA biopsy of salivary gland tumors is safe, well tolerated by the pediatric population, and can be effectively performed in an outpatient setting without sedation in most cases. FNA biopsy is a useful tool in the preoperative management of pediatric patients with salivary gland tumors.

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Pediatric Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Analysis of histologic follow-up, risk of malignancy, and diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of salivary gland tumors in pediatric patients can be challenging. The utility of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytopathology and the performance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) in this age group have not been systematically assessed. The paucity of data has contributed to the controversial role of FNA cytopathology in the presurgical management of these patients. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 104 pediatric salivary gland FNAs (2000-2020). A correlation with the available histopathologic follow-up (n = 54) was performed. The distribution percentages, the risk of neoplasm (RON), and the risk of malignancy (ROM) were assessed for each category of the MSRSGC. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of pediatric salivary gland FNAs were 80%, 97%, and 92%, respectively. The RON values for the nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance, benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant categories were 60%, 11%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, whereas the ROM values were 0%, 11%, 100%, 6%, 67%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The percentage of nonneoplastic FNAs was greater in comparison with the adult population (52% vs 8%). All neoplasms in patients aged 0 to 10 years were malignant, whereas benign neoplasms occurred only in patients aged ≥11 years; this supported an inverse correlation between age and malignancy rate in salivary gland neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: FNA cytopathology demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign pediatric salivary gland lesions. The MSRSGC is a valuable tool for standardization of the reporting and preoperative risk stratification of these lesions.