Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Protetores Solares , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Humanos , Fenóis/provisão & distribuição , Protetores Solares/provisão & distribuição , Fatores de Tempo , Triazinas/provisão & distribuição , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Conflicts of interest in research can affect a company's ability to move a product through the approval processor attract investment. Avoid the pitfalls by taking pro-active steps to manage these risks.
Assuntos
Biotecnologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Conflito de Interesses/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Equipamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Guias como Assunto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The aging population in the U.S. and other developed countries has led to a large increase in the number of patients suffering from degenerative diseases. Transplantation surgery has been a successful therapeutic option for certain patients; however, the availability of suitable donor organs and tissues significantly limits the number of patients who can benefit from this approach. Regenerative medicine has witnessed numerous recent and spectacular advances, making the repair or replacement of dysfunctional organs and tissues an achievable goal. Public-private partnerships and government policies and incentives would further catalyze the development of universally available donor tissues, resulting in broad medical and economic benefits. This article describes a Regenerative Medicine Grand Challenge that the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine recently shared with the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy in response to a White House call to action in scientific disciplines suggesting that the development of "universal donor tissues" should be designated as a Regenerative Medicine Grand Challenge. Such a designation would raise national awareness of the potential of regenerative medicine to address the unmet needs of many diseases and would stimulate the scientific partnerships and investments in technology needed to expedite this goal. Here we outline key policy changes and technological challenges that must be addressed to achieve the promise of a major breakthrough in the treatment of degenerative disease. A nationalized effort and commitment to develop universal donor tissues could realize this goal within 10 years and along the way result in significant innovation in manufacturing technologies. SIGNIFICANCE: Regenerative therapies, in which dysfunctional or degenerating cells, tissues, or organs are repaired or replaced, have the potential to cure chronic degenerative diseases. Such treatments are limited by a shortage of donor organs and tissues and the need for immune suppression to prevent rejection. This article proposes a 21st Century Grand Challenge that would address this significant medical need by coordinating a national effort to convene the multidisciplinary expertise needed to manufacture functional and engraftable cells, tissues, or organs that could be made available to any patient without significant risk of rejection-so-called universal donor tissues.
Assuntos
Doenças Neurodegenerativas/terapia , Regeneração , Medicina Regenerativa/métodos , Humanos , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/epidemiologia , Medicina Regenerativa/normas , Medicina Regenerativa/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Effective interaction between key stakeholders and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is central to successfully navigating the regulatory process and advancing new therapies into clinical trials. This is especially true when developing cell-based therapies, which pose unique challenges to demonstrating safety and effectiveness. There are numerous opportunities for developers of a new cell therapy to interact with the regulatory agency, through both formal and informal processes. It is important to understand how to maximize the productivity of dialogue with the FDA and develop an effective regulatory strategy. This article provides an overview of the types of interactions with the FDA that are available throughout the regulatory process. This article also notes some common pitfalls to avoid and directs readers to additional references and resources to help inform cell therapy researchers and product developers and enable successful regulatory interactions.