Early responses to adenoviral-mediated transfer of the aquaporin-1 cDNA for radiation-induced salivary hypofunction.

No conventional therapy exists for salivary hypofunction in surviving head and neck cancer patients with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late grade 2-3 toxicity. We conducted a phase I clinical trial to test the safety and biologic efficacy of serotype 5, adenoviral-mediated aquaporin-1 cDNA transfer to a single previously irradiated parotid gland in 11 subjects using an open label, single-dose, dose-escalation design (AdhAQP1 vector; four dose tiers from 4.8 × 10(7) to 5.8 × 10(9) vector particles per gland). Treated subjects were followed at scheduled intervals. Multiple safety parameters were measured and biologic efficacy was evaluated with measurements of parotid salivary flow rate. Symptoms were assessed with a visual analog scale. All subjects tolerated vector delivery and study procedures well over the 42-d study period reported. No deaths, serious adverse events, or dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Generally, few adverse events occurred, and all were considered mild or moderate. No consistent changes were found in any clinical chemistry and hematology parameters measured. Objective responses were seen in six subjects, all at doses <5.8 × 10(9) vector particles per gland. Five of these six subjects also experienced subjective improvement in xerostomia. AdhAQP1 vector delivery to a single parotid gland was safe and transfer of the hAQP1 cDNA increased parotid flow and relieved symptoms in a subset of subjects.

90Y-Daclizumab (Anti-CD25), High-Dose Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Yielded Sustained Complete Remissions in 4 Patients with Recurrent Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Background: Despite advances in therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a proportion of patients will not respond or relapse. The authors had previously identified CD25, IL-2Rα, as a target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL since most normal cells do not express CD25, but it is expressed by a minority of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells and most Tregs rosetting around HRS cells. Study Design and Treatment: This was a single institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II trial of radiolabeled 90Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Four patients with refractory and relapsed HL were treated in this trial with 3 patients receiving a single dose of 564.6-574.6 MBq 90Y-daclizumab and the fourth patient receiving two doses of 580.9-566.1 MBq 90Y-daclizumab followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results: All 4 evaluable patients treated with 90Y-daclizumab obtained complete responses (CRs) that are ongoing 4.5-7 years following their stem cell transplant. The spectrum and severity of adverse events were mild and more importantly none of the patients, including several with multiple therapies before this treatment, developed the myelodysplastic syndrome. Discussion: Targeting by daclizumab was not directed primarily at tumor cells, but rather the nonmalignant CD25-expressing T cells adjacent to the HRS cells and 90Y-daclizumab provided strong enough ß emissions to kill CD25-negative tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong ß irradiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: 90Y-daclizumab (anti-CD25), high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT was well tolerated and yielded sustained complete remissions in all 4 patients with recurrent HL patients who completed their treatment. Significance: Despite advances, a proportion of patients with HL will not have a CR to their initial treatment, and some with CRs will relapse. They demonstrated that the addition of 90Y-daclizumab into the preconditioning regimen for refractory and relapsed HL patients with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT provided sustained CRs in the 4 patients studied. Two of these patients were highly refractory to multiple prior treatments with bulky disease at entry into this study, including 1 patient who never entered a remission and had failed 6 different therapeutic regimens. Despite the small number of patients treated in this study, the sustained clinical benefit in these patients indicates a highly effective treatment. The daclizumab was directed primarily not at HRS cells themselves but toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around malignant cells. 90Y provided strong ß emissions that killed antigen nonexpressing tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong ß radiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment that nurtured the malignant cells in the lymphomatous mass. The present study supports expanded analysis of 90Y-daclizumab as part of the regimen of ASCT in patients with refractory and relapsed HL.

Role of positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of bone involvement in metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: specific implications for succinate dehydrogenase enzyme subunit B gene mutations.

We performed a retrospective analysis of 71 subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (30 subjects with mutation of succinate dehydrogenase enzyme subunit B (SDHB) gene and 41 subjects without SDHB mutation). Sixty-nine percent presented with bone metastases (SDHB +/-: 77% vs 63%), 39% with liver metastases (SDHB +/-: 27% vs 47%), and 32% with lung metastases (SDHB +/-: 37% vs 29%). The most common sites of bone involvement were thoracic spine (80%; SDHB+/-: 83% vs 77%), lumbar spine (78%; SDHB +/-: 78% vs 75%), and pelvic and sacral bones (78%; SDHB +/-: 91% vs 65%, P=0.04). Subjects with SDHB mutation also showed significantly higher involvement of long bones (SDHB +/-: 78% vs 30%, P=0.007) than those without the mutation. The best overall sensitivity in detecting bone metastases demonstrated positron emission tomography (PET) with 6-[(18)F]-fluorodopamine ([(18)F]-FDA; 90%), followed by bone scintigraphy (82%), computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI; 78%), 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ([(18)F]-FDG) PET (76%), and scintigraphy with [(123/131)I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (71%). In subjects with SDHB mutation, imaging modalities with best sensitivities for detecting bone metastases were CT/MRI (96%), bone scintigraphy (95%), and [(18)F]-FDG PET (92%). In subjects without SDHB mutations, the modality with the best sensitivity for bone metastases was [(18)F]-FDA PET (100%). In conclusion, bone scintigraphy should be used in the staging of patients with malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, particularly in patients with SDHB mutations. As for PET imaging, [(18)F]-FDG PET is highly recommended in SDHB mutation patients, whereas [(18)F]-FDA PET is recommended in patients without the mutation.

Functional imaging of SDHx-related head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-fluorodopamine, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET, 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy.

RATIONALE: Accurate diagnosis of head and neck paragangliomas is often complicated by biochemical silence and lack of catecholamine-associated symptoms, making accurate anatomical and functional imaging techniques essential to the diagnostic process. METHODS: Ten patients (seven SDHD, three SDHB), with a total of 26 head and neck paragangliomas, were evaluated with anatomical and functional imaging. This study compares five different functional imaging techniques [(18)F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET), (18)F-fluorodopamine ((18)F-FDA) PET/computed tomography (CT), (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT, (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) scintigraphy, and (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy] in the localization of head and neck paragangliomas. RESULTS: Prospectively (18)F-FDOPA PET localized 26 of 26 lesions in the 10 patients, CT/magnetic resonance imaging localized 21 of 26 lesions, (18)F-FDG PET/CT localized 20 of 26 lesions, (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy localized 16 of 25 lesions, (18)F-FDA PET/CT localized 12 of 26 lesions, and (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy localized eight of 26 lesions. Differences in imaging efficacy related to genetic phenotype, even in the present small sample size, included the negativity of (18)F-FDA PET/CT and (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy in patients with SDHB mutations and the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in all patients with SDHD mutations, as compared with the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in only one patient with an SDHB mutation. CONCLUSION: Overall, (18)F-FDOPA PET proved to be the most efficacious functional imaging modality in the localization of SDHx-related head and neck paragangliomas and may be a potential first-line functional imaging agent for the localization of these tumors.