Group B Streptococcus and Intraamniotic Inflammation and Infection.

Intraamniotic inflammation and infection complicate 2% to 5% of term deliveries. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a common cause of intraamniotic infection associated with invasive neonatal disease and maternal morbidity. Universal vaginal-rectal screening for GBS colonization is recommended between 36 and 37 weeks. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for individuals with positive GBS screens and other risk factors. Intravenous penicillin is the preferred antimicrobial agent. Individuals with penicillin allergies may receive cefazolin for low-risk allergies and either clindamycin or vancomycin for high-risk allergies, depending on their antimicrobial susceptibilities. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of maternal anti-GBS vaccine candidates.

Transfusion and hematologic indices in cases of stillbirth due to placental abruption.

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth because of placental abruption is often associated with maternal hemorrhage and coagulopathy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe blood product requirements, hematologic indices, and the overall clinical picture of patients experiencing abruption demise. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort included patients with abruption demise at an urban hospital from 2010 to 2020. Outcome data from patients who delivered stillborn infants ≥500 g or with gestational age of ≥24 weeks were included. Abruption was a clinical diagnosis made by a multidisciplinary stillbirth review committee. The overall number and type of blood products given were analyzed. Patients with a stillbirth who required blood transfusion were compared with those that did not. In addition, the hematologic indices of these 2 populations were analyzed and compared with one another. Finally, the overall clinical characteristics of the 2 populations were analyzed. The analysis of data included chi-square, t test, and logistic and negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Of 128,252 deliveries, 615 patients (0.48%) experienced a stillbirth, with 76 cases (12%) caused by abruption. Of note, 42 patients (55.2%) required blood transfusion; all received either packed red blood cells or whole blood with a median 3.5 units (2.0-5.5) received. The total units ranged from 1 to 59, with 12 of 42 patients (29%) requiring ≥10 units. Maternal age, gestational age, and mode of delivery were not different, with most (61/76 [80%]) delivering vaginally. Hematocrit level on arrival (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.91; P=.002) and vaginal bleeding on arrival (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-13.40; P=.033) were associated with blood transfusion, as was a diagnosis of preeclampsia (odds ratio, 8.40; 95% confidence interval, 2.49-33.41; P=.001). Those that required a blood transfusion often presented with lower hematologic indices and were more likely to develop disseminated intravascular coagulation (28% vs 0%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Most patients experiencing stillbirth because of abruption required blood transfusion, with almost 1 in 3 of those patients consuming ≥10 units of blood products. Hematocrit level on arrival, vaginal bleeding, and preeclampsia were all predictors of the need for blood transfusion. Those requiring blood transfusion were more likely to develop disseminated intravascular coagulation. Blood transfusion should be prioritized when abruption demise is suspected.

Implementation of universal screening for substance use in pregnancy in a public healthcare system.

Objective: Screening questionnaires are one option for identification of at-risk substance use and substance use disorder (SUD) during pregnancy. We report the experience of a single institution following universal implementation of a brief screening tool for self-reported substance use at the first prenatal encounter. Study Design: This is a prospective implementation study evaluating screening for substance use in pregnancy in a large safety net healthcare system. Universal screening with the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Quick Screen V1.0 was integrated into the electronic medical record (EMR) and administered at the first point of contact with the healthcare system. SUD was identified initially with diagnosis within the EMR by a healthcare provider and was confirmed with toxicology (maternal or neonatal) results corroborating a pattern of substance use and maternal and neonatal ICD-10 codes for SUD. Patients identified with SUD were then classified as moderate or severe SUD based on criteria established by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. We measured rates of NIDA implementation across different healthcare settings, evaluated NIDA concordance with ascertainment of SUD, and compared adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with moderate and severe SUD. Results: From July 28, 2021, through June 25, 2022, 14,634 unique pregnant individuals accessed care at ambulatory and acute care sites. Universal implementation of the NIDA Quick Screen identified at-risk substance use in 2146 (14.7%) of those who accessed our system, or 17.1% of 12,550 screened across the system, with greater screen completion in ambulatory over acute care settings. SUD was identified in 256 (1.7%) of 14,634 individuals and moderate or severe SUD was identified in 184 (1.3%). Among those with moderate or severe SUD, 90 (48.9%) were NIDA positive, 22 (12.0%) NIDA negative, and 72 (39.1%) unscreened. Of 94 individuals with NIDA discordance or who were unscreened 76 (81%) accessed initial care through an acute care setting. Of 96 individuals with opioid use disorder, 68 (70.8%) were treated with medication-assisted therapy, and 56 (58.3%) were screened with the NIDA Quick Screen. Among delivered individuals with available outcomes, those with moderate or severe SUD were less likely to seek prenatal care (71 (76%) vs 9852 (98%), <0.001)) and more likely to deliver before 37 weeks, (18 (20%) vs 909 (9%), RR (95% CI) 2.13 (1.40, 3.24)) compared to individuals without SUD. Neonates exposed to moderate or severe SUD were more likely to have birth weight <10th centile for gestational age (20 (22%) vs 1147 (12%), RR (95% CI) 1.92 (1.29, 2.85)) and require admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (19 (21%) vs 964 (10%), RR (95%) 1.95 (1.30, 2.93)). Conclusion: Universal screening was implemented across a large public healthcare system at a high rate, with higher rates of implementation in ambulatory settings. NIDA successfully identified at-risk substance use in 17% of the SUD cohort but failed to identify more than 50% of patients with moderate or severe SUD. Patients with moderate and severe SUD accessed care primarily through the emergency department and experienced higher rates of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Future efforts to identify, engage, and retain this highest-risk group are needed.

Examining the impact of trimester of diagnosis on COVID-19 disease progression in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection is associated with increased morbidity in pregnancy and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Little is currently known about how the timing of infection during pregnancy affects these outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of trimester of COVID-19 infection on disease progression and severity in pregnant patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection who delivered at a single urban hospital. Universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed at hospital admission and for symptomatic patients in inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings. Disease severity was defined as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, or critical on the basis of National Institutes of Health criteria. We evaluated disease progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic infection and from asymptomatic or mild infection to moderate, severe, or critical illness, and stratified by trimester of COVID-19 diagnosis. Primary outcomes included progression of COVID-19 disease severity and a composite obstetrical outcome, which included delivery at <37 weeks, preeclampsia with severe features, abruption, excess blood loss at delivery (>500 mL for vaginal or >1000 mL for cesarean delivery), and stillbirth. RESULTS: From March 18, 2020 to September 30, 2021, 1326 pregnant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 and delivered at our institution, including 103 (8%) first-, 355 (27%) second-, and 868 (65%) third-trimester patients. First-trimester patients were older and had more medical comorbidities; 86% of patients in all trimesters were Hispanic. Among patients admitted within 14 days of a positive test, 3 of 18 (17%) first-trimester, 20 of 47 (43%) second-trimester, and 34 of 574 (6%) third-trimester patients were admitted for the indication of COVID-19 illness. Across all trimesters, 1195 (90%) of 1326 COVID-19 infections were asymptomatic or mild, and 45 (10%) of 436 initially asymptomatic patients developed symptoms. Of patients with asymptomatic or mild symptoms at diagnosis, 4 (4%) of 93 first-, 18 (5%) of 337 second-, and 49 (6%) of 836 third-trimester patients developed moderate, severe, or critical illness (P=.80). There was no significant difference in composite obstetrical outcome with respect to trimester of COVID-19 diagnosis (24% first-trimester, 28% second-trimester, 28% third-trimester patients; P=.69). CONCLUSION: Moderate, severe, or critical illness develops in almost 10% of pregnant patients. The frequency of COVID-19 disease progression in pregnancy does not differ by trimester of diagnosis.