Meropenem pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid: comparing intermittent and continuous infusion strategies in critically ill patients-a prospective cohort study.

Meropenem penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is subject to high interindividual variability resulting in uncertain target attainment in CSF. Recently, several authors recommended administering meropenem as a continuous infusion (CI) to optimize CSF exposure. This study aimed to compare the concentrations and pharmacokinetics of meropenem in CSF after intermittent infusion (II) and CI. This prospective, observational study (NCT04426383) included critically ill patients with external ventricular drains who received either II or CI of meropenem. Meropenem pharmacokinetics in plasma and CSF were characterized using population pharmacokinetic modeling (NONMEM 7.5). The developed model was used to compare the concentration-time profile and probability of target attainment (PTA) between II and CI. A total of 16 patients (8 CI, 8 II; samples: nplasma = 243, nCSF = 263) were recruited, with nine patients (5 CI, 4 II) suffering from cerebral and seven patients from extracerebral infections. A one-compartment model described the plasma concentrations adequately. Meropenem penetration into the CSF (partition coefficient (KP), cCSF/cplasma) was generally low (6.0%), exhibiting substantial between-subject variability (coefficient of variation: 84.0%). There was no correlation between the infusion mode and KP, but interleukin (IL)-6 measured in CSF showed a strong positive correlation with KP (P < 0.001). Dosing simulations revealed no relevant differences in CSF concentrations and PTA in CSF between CI and II. Our study did not demonstrate increased penetration rates or higher concentrations of meropenem in the CSF with CI compared with II. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04426383.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacological target attainment of standard temocillin dosing in non-critically ill patients with complicated urinary tract infections.

OBJECTIVES: Temocillin, a carbapenem-sparing ß-lactam antibiotic, is commonly used at the standard 4 g/day dosage for treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). However, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data supporting this regimen is limited. This study evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) and PTA of temocillin in non-critically ill cUTI patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency (RI). METHODS: In this single-centre clinical study, 22 cUTI patients received a fixed 4 g/day (2 g q12h, intravenously) temocillin dose, irrespective of renal function (no RI: n = 5, mild RI: n = 8, moderate RI: n = 9). Plasma samples were collected post-dosing for LC-MS analysis of total and unbound temocillin levels. Monte Carlo simulations were performed based on the established PK/PD target of ≥35% fT > MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration). RESULTS: Among patients, the highest plasma drug exposure and PK/PD target attainment were observed in those with moderate RI (median AUC0-12h = 1143 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 68%), followed by mild RI patients (median AUC0-12h = 918 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 34%), and the lowest in those with healthy kidney function (median AUC0-12h = 692 h.mg/L and %fT > MIC = 26%). Simulations indicated that the 4 g/day temocillin dose achieves 90% PTA only for glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min and MIC ≤ 8 mg/L. CONCLUSION: The standard temocillin dose may need to be increased from 4 to 6 g/day to treat non-critically ill cUTI patients, in line with recent EUCAST recommendations. For patients with moderate RI, who experience higher exposure due to reduced renal drug clearance, 4 g/day temocillin remains appropriate.

Best Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Position Statement from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Predictive performance of multi-model approaches for model-informed precision dosing of piperacillin in critically ill patients.

Piperacillin (PIP)/tazobactam is a frequently prescribed antibiotic; however, over- or underdosing may contribute to toxicity, therapeutic failure, and development of antimicrobial resistance. An external evaluation of 24 published PIP-models demonstrated that model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can enhance target attainment. Employing various candidate models, this study aimed to assess the predictive performance of different MIPD-approaches comparing (i) a single-model approach, (ii) a model selection algorithm (MSA) and (iii) a model averaging algorithm (MAA). Precision, accuracy and expected target attainment, considering either initial (B1) or initial and secondary (B2) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-samples per patient, were assessed in a multicenter dataset (561 patients, 11 German centers, 3654 TDM-samples). The results demonstrated a slight superiority in predictive performance using MAA in B1, regardless of the candidate models, compared to MSA and the best single models (MAA, MSA, single models: inaccuracy ±3%, ±10%, ±8%; imprecision: <25%, <31%, <28%; expected target attainment >77%, >71%, >73%). The inclusion of a second TDM-sample notably improved precision and target attainment for all MIPD-approaches, particularly within the context of MSA and most of the single models. The expected target attainment is maximized (up to >90%) when the TDM-sample is integrated within 24 hours. In conclusion, MAA streamlines MIPD by reducing the risk of selecting an inappropriate model for specific patients. Therefore, MIPD of PIP using MAA implicates further optimization of antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients, by improving predictive performance with only one sample available for Bayesian forecasting, safety, and usability in clinical practice.

Towards a better detection of patients at-risk of linezolid toxicity in clinical practice: a prospective study in three Belgian hospital centers.

Introduction: Linezolid is a last-resort antibiotic for infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. It is widely used for off-label indications and for longer than recommended treatment durations, exposing patients at higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), notably thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate ADR incidence and risk factors, identify thrombocytopenia-related trough levels based on treatment duration, and evaluate the performance of predictive scores for ADR development. Methods: Adult in- and outpatients undergoing linezolid therapy were enrolled in three hospitals and ADRs and linezolid trough levels prospectively monitored over time. A population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK model) was used to estimate trough levels for blood samples collected at varying times. Results: A multivariate analysis based on 63 treatments identified treatment duration ≥10 days and trough levels >8 mg/L as independent risk factors of developing thrombocytopenia, with high trough values correlated with impaired renal function. Five patients treated for >28 days did not develop thrombocytopenia but maintained trough values in the target range (<8 mg/L). The Buzelé predictive score, which combines an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with treatment duration, demonstrated 77% specificity and 67% sensitivity to predict the risk of ADR. Conclusion: Our work supports the necessity of establishing guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the systematic use of TDM in patients at-risk in order to keep trough values ≤8 mg/L. The Buzelé predictive score (if ≥7) may help to detect these at-risk patients, and pop-PK models can estimate trough levels based on plasma samples collected at varying times, reducing the logistical burden of TDM in clinical practice.