Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Science ; 384(6702): 1335-1339, 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38900872

RESUMO

Vegetation and soils are taking up approximately 30% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions because of small imbalances in large gross carbon exchanges from productivity and turnover that are poorly constrained. We combined a new budget of radiocarbon produced by nuclear bomb testing in the 1960s with model simulations to evaluate carbon cycling in terrestrial vegetation. We found that most state-of-the-art vegetation models used in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project underestimated the radiocarbon accumulation in vegetation biomass. Our findings, combined with constraints on vegetation carbon stocks and productivity trends, imply that net primary productivity is likely at least 80 petagrams of carbon per year presently, compared with the 43 to 76 petagrams per year predicted by current models. Storage of anthropogenic carbon in terrestrial vegetation is likely more short-lived and vulnerable than previously predicted.


Assuntos
Ciclo do Carbono , Dióxido de Carbono , Carbono , Plantas , Biomassa , Carbono/metabolismo , Carbono/análise , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Radioisótopos de Carbono/análise , Armas Nucleares , Plantas/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA