A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine currently being developed for procedural sedation and for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. This trial was the fourth study for procedural sedation. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy profile of remimazolam and to refine suitable doses for subsequent phase III studies in this indication. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled clinical trial with 162 male and female patients, aged 18 to 70, scheduled to undergo a routine colonoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 remimazolam doses or midazolam for sedation. Supplemental oxygen and 100 µg of fentanyl was given before procedures were started, and the colonoscopy commenced as soon as suitable sedation had been achieved (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score ≤3). Top-up doses of the study drug and/or fentanyl were allowed to maintain suitable sedation and/or analgesia. Response was defined as sufficient sedation, no rescue sedative, and no ventilation required. RESULTS: This study showed that a single dose of remimazolam or midazolam, followed by top-up doses to maintain suitable sedation, provided adequate sedation with a high success rate (>92%) for the remimazolam groups, compared with 75% for the midazolam group (P = .007). There was no requirement for mechanical ventilation in any group, and procedure failures were all due to use of rescue sedative. CONCLUSIONS: The high success rates and good safety profile of remimazolam observed in this study warrants further investigation and confirmation in phase III trials. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01145222.).

A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study was the first study of remimazolam in patients to assess the safety and efficacy of different single doses for procedural sedation. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of remimazolam or midazolam (25 per group) in a double-blind manner. After a single dose of study drug to achieve sedation, patients underwent gastroscopy. We assessed the success of the procedure, sedation levels, recovery from sedation, and safety. RESULTS: A single dose of remimazolam resulted in a successful procedure in 32%, 56%, and 64% of patients in the low (0.10), middle (0.15), and high (0.20 mg/kg) dose groups compared with 44% of patients in the midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) dose group. The onset of sedation was 1.5 to 2.5 minutes in the remimazolam dose groups compared with 5 minutes for midazolam. Because this was a single administration study, sedation could be maintained for as long as necessary to complete the procedure, using rescue midazolam or propofol. Recovery from sedation was rapid for all treatment groups but was influenced by the choice of rescue medication. There were no obvious differences in the safety profiles of remimazolam and midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory dose-finding study showed that a single administration of remimazolam (0.10-0.20 mg/kg) was capable of inducing rapid sedation with a quick recovery profile in patients undergoing a diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The safety profile was favorable and appeared to be similar to that of midazolam, warranting further development of this short-acting compound.

A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: We performed the first multiple dose study of remimazolam designed to assess both the feasibility of maintaining suitable sedation during colonoscopy and reversing the sedative effects of remimazolam with flumazenil. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received fentanyl followed by remimazolam for sedation during colonoscopy. Three dose groups of 15 volunteers each received remimazolam in increasing initial doses, plus top-up doses to maintain sedation for a 30-minute period. In a separate double-blind crossover part of the trial, 6 volunteers were sedated with a single high dose of remimazolam, followed by flumazenil or placebo to reverse the sedation. RESULTS: Successful sedation that was adequate for colonoscopy was achieved in >70% of subjects. After the procedure, subjects rapidly recovered to fully alert, with a median of <10 minutes overall. Failures were due to the inability to sedate or adverse events, with 1 subject failing due to hypotension (arterial blood pressure 80/40) and low SpO2 (<90%). There were no serious adverse events reported, and no events that were unexpected with the combination of a benzodiazepine and fentanyl. The study also showed that sedation was rapidly reversible (1.0 minutes flumazenil vs 10.5 minutes placebo) without resedation. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam has the attributes of a sedative drug, with success rates comparable with recent studies of other drugs. Remimazolam provided adequate sedation in 33 of 44 subjects undergoing colonoscopy, and its sedative effects were easily reversed with flumazenil.

Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that desmoteplase, a novel plasminogen activator, has clinical benefit when given 3-9 h after the onset of the symptoms of stroke in patients with presumptive tissue at risk that is identified by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging (PI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging study, patients with acute ischaemic stroke and tissue at risk seen on either MRI or CT imaging were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, or placebo within 3-9 h after the onset of symptoms of stroke. The primary endpoint was clinical response rates at day 90, defined as a composite of improvement in National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score of 8 points or more or an NIHSS score of 1 point or less, a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 points, and a Barthel index of 75-100. Secondary endpoints included change in lesion volume between baseline and day 30, rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality rates. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00111852. FINDINGS: Between June, 2005, and March, 2007, 193 patients were randomised, and 186 patients received treatment: 57 received 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 66 received 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 63 received placebo. 158 patients completed the study. The median baseline NIHSS score was 9 (IQR 6-14) points, and 30% (53 of 179) of the patients had a visible occlusion of a vessel at presentation. The core lesion and the mismatch volumes were small (median volumes were 10.6 cm(3) and 52.5 cm(3), respectively). The clinical response rates at day 90 were 47% (27 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 36% (24 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 46% (29 of 63) for placebo. The median changes in lesion volume were: 90 microg/kg desmoteplase 14.0% (0.5 cm(3)); 125 microg/kg desmoteplase 10.8% (0.3 cm(3)); placebo -10.0% (-0.9 cm(3)). The rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were 3.5% (2 of 57) for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase, 4.5% (3 of 66) for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase, and 0% for placebo. The overall mortality rate was 11% (5% [3 of 57] for 90 microg/kg desmoteplase; 21% [14 of 66] for 125 microg/kg desmoteplase; and 6% [4 of 63] for placebo). INTERPRETATION: The DIAS-2 study did not show a benefit of desmoteplase given 3-9 h after the onset of stroke. The high response rate in the placebo group could be explained by the mild strokes recorded (low baseline NIHSS scores, small core lesions, and small mismatch volumes that were associated with no vessel occlusions), which possibly reduced the potential to detect any effect of desmoteplase. FUNDING: PAION Deutschland GmbH; Forest Laboratories.

Binding of recombinant mistletoe lectin (aviscumine) to resected human adenocarcinoma of the lung.

BACKGROUND: Lectins, carbohydrate proteins, bind to glycoconjugates of all mammalian cells, including cancer cells. Aberrant glycosylation, detected by lectin histochemistry, can predict outcome in some tumour entities. One such lectin is aviscumine (recombinant mistletoe lectin). Aviscumine has cytotoxic effects and can therefore be used as anti-tumour therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lectin histochemistry with aviscumine was performed on primary tumour sections from resected adenocarcinoma of the lung. Staining results were then correlated with the clinical course of the patients. RESULTS: Most of the adenocarcinomas (92.5%) bound aviscumine. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no correlation between aviscumine binding and progression-free survival or overall survival. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that for the selected group of patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung aviscumine binding activity can not serve as a prognostic factor. More strikingly, however, aviscumine binds to malignant cells in 92.5% of the patients. This is an indicator for the use of aviscumine as a possible target for tumour therapy.

Adaptation and performance of an immuno-PCR assay for the quantification of Aviscumine in patient plasma samples.

An immuno-polymerase chain reaction (IPCR) assay is used to evaluate the kinetic behaviour of the novel anti-cancer drug Aviscumine in plasma samples taken from 41 patients during a 3-year clinical trial. The ultrasensitive IPCR assay employed the amplification of a detection-antibody linked marker-DNA and an internal competitor DNA for standardization, thus enabling the detection of the antigen in concentrations far below the detection limit of conventional enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA). The quantification of Aviscumine was carried out using external calibration curves obtained from individual patient plasma samples, collected previous to the administration of Aviscumine, which were spiked with known amounts of the reference substance Aviscumine. Additional controls were measured containing standardized human serum spiked with Aviscumine to assure the continuous general reproducibility of the assay as well as to estimate differences between individual patients. Average recovery was found to be 95+/-19% and the average deviation in precision of the assay was determined to be 9+/-5%. Data for the quantification of Aviscumine were obtained from all patient samples investigated with the exception of a single patient. The collected data provided the basis for the valid routine quantification of patient samples for the calculation of the pharmacokinetic behaviour of Aviscumine in patient plasma.

Phase I study of Solulin, a novel recombinant soluble human thrombomodulin analogue.

Solulin is a novel recombinant soluble derivative of human thrombomodulin. In this first human study of Solulin, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Solulin in 30 healthy volunteers in response to single (0.6-30 mg) and 12 healthy volunteers in response to multiple (1 and 10 mg) ascending intravenous bolus doses compared to placebo are described. Solulin was shown to be well tolerated, and demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics over the clinically relevant dose range, with a plasma elimination half-life of 15-30 hours, indicating that a less than daily dose may be required for therapeutic use. Steady-state plasma levels after multiple dosing were reached after 48 hours. Solulin has shown to be able to inhibit thrombin generation without increasing levels of aPC/PCI complexes. Coagulation parameters INR and PT were not changed, aPTT was elevated to about 10% above the upper limit of normal after the highest single dose only. Thrombin clotting time was prolonged after administration of high dose Solulin (10, 30 mg). No effect on in vitro bleeding time has been found. There was no evidence of bleeding risk with Solulin administration. The pharmacodynamic effects correlated with Solulin plasma concentrations. This demonstrates that the antithrombotic effect of Solulin is predictable, suggesting that patient monitoring is not expected. The results of this study provide evidence that Solulin can be expected to be an effective and safe anticoagulant, and further clinical investigation is warranted.

Phase I trial of r viscumin (INN: aviscumine) given subcutaneously in patients with advanced cancer: a study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC protocol number 13001).

Safety of aviscumine by subcutaneous route was assessed in patients with advanced cancer refractory to chemotherapy. Patients with progressive disease received escalating doses twice weekly. Treatment of the accrued 26 patients (10 colorectal cancer (CRC), 6 soft tissue sarcoma (STS), 5 melanoma (MM), 5 others) was well tolerated without substance-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Grade 1/2 toxicities were predominantly injection site reactions. Aviscumine lacked dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) up to a maximal dose of 10 ng/kg. An increase of interleukin-1 beta and interferon-gamma from baseline was seen in the patient's plasma between the 1st and 11th injection. Highest release of both cytokines was in the dose range of 4-5.9 ng/kg. Interferon-gamma was not detected after doses higher than 6 ng/kg. Eight patients (5 CRC, 1 MM, 1 STS, 1 RCC) had disease stabilisation for 79-250 days (median122 days) associated with an increase of interleukin (IL)-1 beta and interferon (IFN)-gamma. Aviscumine was well tolerated and appeared to possess clinical activity at a biologically active dose between 4 and 6 ng/kg.