Sociodemographic and Appointment Factors Affecting Missed Opportunities to Provide Neonatal Ultrasound Imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess disparities in outpatient imaging missed care opportunities (IMCOs) for neonatal ultrasound by sociodemographic and appointment factors at a large urban pediatric hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed among patients aged 0 to 28 days receiving one or more outpatient appointments for head, hip, renal, or spine ultrasound at the main hospital or satellite sites from 2008 to 2018. An IMCO was defined as a missed ultrasound or cancellation <24 hours in advance. Population-average correlated logistic regression modeling estimated the odds of IMCOs for six sociodemographic (age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, insurance, and region of residence) and seven appointment (type of ultrasound, time, day, season, site, year, and distance to appointment) factors. The primary analysis included unknown values as a separate category, and the secondary analysis used multiple imputation to impute genuine categories from unknown variables. RESULTS: The data set comprised 5,474 patients totaling 6,803 ultrasound appointments. IMCOs accounted for 4.4% of appointments. IMCOs were more likely for Black (odds ratio [OR], 3.31; P < .001) and other-race neonates (OR, 2.66; P < .001) and for patients with public insurance (OR, 1.78; P = .002). IMCOs were more likely for appointments at the main hospital compared with satellites (P < .001), during work hours (P = .021), and on weekends (P < .001). Statistical significance for primary and secondary analyses was quantitatively similar and qualitatively identical. CONCLUSIONS: Marginalized racial groups and those with public insurance had a higher rate of IMCOs in neonatal ultrasound. This likely represents structural inequities faced by these communities, and more research is needed to identify interventions to address these inequities in care delivery for vulnerable neonatal populations.

Community asthma initiative: evaluation of a quality improvement program for comprehensive asthma care.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) program in reducing asthma emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, limitation of physical activity, patient missed school, and parent missed work. METHODS: Urban, low-income patients with asthma from 4 zip codes were identified through logs of ED visits or hospitalizations, and offered enhanced care including nurse case management and home visits. QI evaluation focused on parent-completed interviews at enrollment, and at 6- and 12-month contacts. Hospital administrative data were used to assess ED visits and hospitalizations at enrollment, and 1 and 2 years after enrollment. Hospital costs of the program were compared with the hospital costs of a neighboring community with similar demographics. RESULTS: The program provided services to 283 children. Participants were 55.1% male; 39.6% African American, 52.3% Latino; 72.7% had Medicaid; 70.8% had a household income <$25 000. Twelve-month data show a significant decrease in any (≥1) asthma ED visits (68.0%) and hospitalizations (84.8%), and any days of limitation of physical activity (42.6%), patient missed school (41.0%), and parent missed work (49.7%) (all P < .0001). Patients with greatest functional impairment from ED visits, limitation of activity, and missed school were more likely to have any nurse home visit and greater number of home visits. There was a significant reduction in hospital costs compared with the comparison community (P < .0001), and a return on investment of 1.46. CONCLUSIONS: The program showed improved health outcomes and cost-effectiveness and generated information to guide advocacy efforts to finance comprehensive asthma care.

Children's hospital boston community Asthma initiative: partnerships and outcomes advance policy change.

PROBLEM: Rates of poorly controlled asthma among low-income children, particularly racial and ethnic minorities, remain disproportionately high. Comprehensive asthma programs, including education, case management and home environmental interventions have reduced disparities. Few sustainable payment models exist. PURPOSE: The Children's Hospital Boston's Community Asthma Initiative (CAI) demonstrated dramatic reductions in hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among African American and Latino patients with a return on investment (ROI) of 1.46. A strong coalition focused on sustainability plus CAI outcomes contributed to the state legislature's approving a bundled payment pilot for high-risk pediatric asthma patients on Medicaid/MassHealth. KEY POINTS: Cost-effective, comprehensive asthma programs and policy makers' interest in new payment models created an opportunity for a new payment approach for pediatric asthma care. CONCLUSION: A community coalition that successfully addresses asthma health disparities with a strong business case and program outcomes can be leveraged to persuade policy makers of the value of innovative financing strategies for asthma care.