Supporting Disclosure of Unmet Mental Health Needs among Parents of Critically Ill Infants.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize (1) the prevalence of mental health discussion and (2) facilitators of and barriers to parent disclosure of mental health needs to clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: Parents of infants with neurologic conditions in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units participated in a longitudinal decision-making study from 2018 through 2020. Parents completed semi-structured interviews upon enrollment, within 1 week after a conference with providers, at discharge, and 6 months post-discharge. We used a conventional content analysis approach and NVIVO 12 to analyze data related to mental health. RESULTS: We enrolled 61 parents (n = 40 mothers, n = 21 fathers) of 40 infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit. In total, 123 interviews were conducted with 52 of these parents (n = 37 mothers, n = 15 fathers). Over two-thirds of parents (n = 35/52, 67%) discussed their mental health in a total of 61 interviews. We identified two key domains when approaching the data through the lens of mental health: (1) self-reported barriers to communicating mental health needs: parents shared uncertainty about the presence or benefit of support, a perceived lack of mental health resources and emotional support, and concerns about trust; (2) self-reported facilitators and benefits of communicating mental health needs: parents described the value of supportive team members, connecting to peer support, and speaking to a mental health professional or neutral third party. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of critically ill infants are at high risk of unmet mental health needs. Our results highlight modifiable barriers and actionable facilitators to inform interventions to improve mental health support for parents of critically ill infants.

Development of a curriculum in cultural determinants of health and health disparities.

INTRODUCTION: Current sociopolitical events coupled with requirement modifications by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education have reinvigorated a need for training in cultural awareness and health disparities in undergraduate medical education. Many institutions, however, have not established longitudinal courses designed to address this content. Additionally, little is known about the change in learners' awareness of cultural determinants of health and health disparities after enrollment in such curricula. In 2016, the authors developed a yearlong required course entitled Cultural Determinants of Health and Health Disparities for first year medical students at a large university medical school in the United States. The course launched in the 2017 academic year. METHODS: Two cohorts participated in twelve 2.5 to 3-hour multi-modal sessions focused on various aspects of healthcare delivery for marginalized populations and factors that contribute to health disparities. The Multicultural Assessment Questionnaire was used pre and post course to assess students' self-evaluated changes in knowledge, skills, and awareness related to cultural competency in healthcare. RESULTS: Students' self-reported knowledge, skills, and awareness scores regarding cultural competence in health care increased from pre to post-course assessment. On the knowledge scale, students' mean score increased from 2.63 to 2.97 (P < .001), with 16% reporting a decreased score, 30% reporting no change, and 54% reporting growth. On the skills scale, students' mean score increased from 2.64 to 3.38 (P < .001), with 11% reporting a decreased score, 17% reporting no change, and 72% reporting growth. On the awareness scale, students' overall score increased from 3.76 to 3.97 (P < .05), with 16% reporting a decreased score, 50% reporting no change, and 34% reporting growth. There were no changes in KSA scores across cohorts pre and post course. CONCLUSION: Perceived knowledge, skills, and awareness related to the importance of cultural competence in healthcare delivery increased at the end of the academic year. This type of longitudinal course model could be broadly adopted at other institutions to enhance patient, peer, and future provider awareness regarding cultural impacts on care and health disparities among vulnerable populations.

Education Research: The medical student perspective on challenging conversations.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students experience difficult conversations with patients during clinical clerkships. This study aimed to characterize barriers to and opportunities for learning in the setting of challenging conversations. METHODS: Neurology clerkship medical students were enrolled prospectively in a concurrent nested mixed methods study. Qualitative data were collected using a postclerkship survey and semi-structured focus groups. Students were asked to reflect on challenging conversations they experienced with patients and to identify the top reasons why conversations were challenging. Responses were analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 159 medical students were enrolled (MS2: n = 35 [22%]; MS3: n = 97 [61%]; MS4: n = 27 [17%]). Three themes of difficulty were identified in survey and focus group data: (1) tough clinical realities: how the clinical environment makes conversations challenging; (2) communication skill needs: the difficulty of finding the words to say; and (3) navigating emotions: of patients, clinicians, and students themselves. Tough clinical realities were cited by over two-thirds of students in all years (MS2: n = 30 [86%]; MS3: n = 74 [76%]; MS4: n = 23 [85%]). Communication skills needs were cited most frequently by third-year students (MS2: n = 15 [43%]; MS3: n = 55 [57%]; MS4: n = 10 [37%]). Students early in training were more likely to cite difficulty navigating emotions (MS2: n = 28 [80%]; MS3: n = 71 [73%]; MS4: n = 19 [70%]). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students frequently observe and participate in challenging conversations with patients. Here, students identified what makes these conversations most difficult. Communication curricula should leverage clinical communication encounters, prepare students for inherent clinical realities, and help students navigate emotions in the health care setting.