Evaluation of an enhanced depression and anxiety screening with targeted pharmacist intervention.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a major source of morbidity but often goes undiagnosed. Broader screening is recommended, and pharmacists could contribute. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of community pharmacy depression and anxiety screening and describe the medication-related problems (MRPs) identified, pharmacist interventions, and provider responses for high-risk patients. METHODS: This pilot was conducted between October 2022 and January 2023 at an independently owned community pharmacy in the Midwest United States. Patients aged 18-45 years with ready prescriptions were identified through weekly reports, and tags were placed on prescription bags. A convenience sample of patients fluent in English were offered the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD2), with follow-up PHQ9 and GAD7 for at-risk individuals. High-risk individuals met with the pharmacist for consultation and recommendations were discussed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for participant demographics, questionnaire responses, MRPs, and provider responses. Patient profiles were examined 2 months after the workup to identify medication changes. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients volunteered to be screened for anxiety and depression; of these, 41% scored in the high-risk category for depression or anxiety and met with the pharmacist for the consultation. The pharmacist identified multiple MRPs. The most common was the need for additional therapy and inadequate dosages. Patients were reluctant for the pharmacist to follow up with their prescriber and were unreachable for telephone follow-up. Profiles reviewed 2 months after assessment showed half of the at-risk patients had one or more mental health medication changes. CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists may have a role in the screening and management of patient mental health, although there were challenges with screening uptake and follow-up. The pharmacist identified multiple MRPs for this high-risk group for which greater routine monitoring and follow-up may be beneficial. More work seems needed to engage both patients and prescribers.

Impact of Outpatient Pharmacist Dispensing in an Opioid Use Disorder Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are effective in reducing opioid deaths, but access can be an issue. Relocating an outpatient pharmacist for weekly buprenorphine dispensing in an outpatient clinic may facilitate coverage for buprenorphine and mitigate access and counseling barriers. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if staffing an outpatient resident pharmacist to dispense in the buprenorphine clinic had a positive impact on 1) mean cost-per-prescription charged to charity care and 2) basic elements of patient satisfaction with the on-site pharmacist. METHODS: Patient demographics, buprenorphine formulation, insurance type, and uncovered costs were abstracted from dispensing records in the 16 weeks before the pharmacist clinic presence and 16 weeks with the pharmacist present. The difference in insurance types across the two periods was tested using a Chi-square test and the mean uncovered prescription costs charged to charity care for the two periods was compared using an independent samples t-test. A brief survey was administered while the pharmacist was on site to evaluate satisfaction which was analyzed with frequencies of "yes" responses and free-text comments. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients received buprenorphine during both the pre- and post-periods. Once the pharmacist was on-site, more patients used Medicaid or private insurance, decreasing the mean uncovered cost per prescription from $55.00 (sd 68.7) to $36.97 (sd 60.1) p=.002. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most reporting they were more likely to ask questions, pick up their prescriptions, and take their medicine with the pharmacist in clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist successfully transitioned a portion of prescriptions previously covered by charity care to Medicaid or private insurance. This shift led to a decrease in charity care costs by $2,950.20 and a reduction in the average uncovered cost per prescription. The pharmacist's presence in the clinic appeared to reduce barriers especially related to inconvenience.

Community pharmacist encounters with patients displaying suicide warning signs: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Mental health is a prominent public health issue exacerbated by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Community pharmacists are positioned to contribute. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe Iowa community pharmacists' encounters, confidence, behaviors, and training needs related to patients with suicide warning signs and explore relationships between demographics and previous training with encounter frequency, confidence, and behaviors. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to a sample of community pharmacists in Iowa. Three contacts were made between May and June 2022 including a prenotification letter, survey with a paid return envelope, and reminder postcard, each with a QR code for optional online completion. The survey included demographics, suicide warning sign encounter types, confidence, suicide prevention behaviors, and suicide prevention training history and needs. Analysis of variance and t tests compared differences between demographics and previous training with encounter frequency, confidence, and behaviors. RESULTS: The response rate was 18.3% with 161 survey completions. Pharmacists reported encounters with patients who appeared distressed (96.3%), made concerning statements related to suicide (23.8%), and disclosed suicidal thoughts (8.8%). A minority of pharmacists had asked patients about suicide (21.1%) or referred them to crisis resources in the past year (17.4%). A third had previous suicide prevention training (37.9%), which was associated with higher levels of confidence (P < 0.001) and intervention behaviors (P < 0.05). Respondents expressed interest in training, particularly on intervention and referral. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of community pharmacists encountered patients with suicide warning signs. Providing more pharmacists with training and support in understanding local mental health resources and referrals may increase their confidence and engagement in suicide prevention.

Evaluation of medication disposal behaviors after counseling by a community pharmacist and provision of a home medication disposal kit.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate providing an at-home medication disposal kit on opioid disposal behaviors. Self-report of prior disposal behaviors also was assessed to describe the sample. DESIGN: Pilot study with randomization. Surgery outpatients were counseled on medication disposal by a pharmacist from the outpatient community pharmacy at the bedside and given an informational pamphlet detailing recommended disposal methods. Patients on even-numbered dates also received an at-home medication disposal system, creating a quasi-randomized assignment. SETTING: Hospital outpatient surgery center. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory surgery outpatients filling an opioid prescription. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were called one month after discharge to answer a structured interview about their disposal behaviors. Responses were recorded. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe disposal behaviors, and chi-squared and t-tests were used to assess group differences. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients participated, with 24 receiving a disposal packet. Of the 23 patients that had left-over tablets, 8 patients disposed of them. Seven (30.4%) of patients with leftovers disposed of their medication safely as recommended by the pharmacist during counseling. Rates of appropriate disposal were statistically similar. Of the 14 patients who had left-over opioids and received a disposal packet, 5 (35.7%) patients used the provided packet. Of the 9 patients with left-over opioids who did not receive the disposal packet, 2 (22.2%) patients disposed of their left-over opioids appropriately. CONCLUSION: This pilot provides insight into the implementation of medication disposal services in the ambulatory surgery setting and the potential impact that a community pharmacist can have in promoting safe medication disposal. While the study demonstrated similar rates of disposal, those with the disposal packet exclusively reported using the packet as their method of disposal, suggesting having the packet on-hand simplified decision-making.

A qualitative exploration of patient preferences for Medicare Part D consultation services offered in a community pharmacy setting.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacies currently offer Medicare Part D consultation services to help eligible beneficiaries select prescription medication insurance. Despite these service offerings, there is a paucity of information on patient preferences for these service offerings and optimal service delivery from the patient perspective. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate patient expectations of and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for community pharmacy Medicare Part D consultation services, (2) identify components of Medicare Part D consultation services associated with service quality, and (3) explore differences in preferences and service expectations between services-experienced and service-naive patients. METHODS: This was a qualitative exploratory study, with data collected using interviews and a follow-up supplemental survey with participants recruited from 5 community pharmacies across the state of Iowa participating in the Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network. A total of 17 patients contacted the research team for participation. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, with qualitative data analysis performed using template analysis guided by the SERVQUAL framework. Interview participants were invited to complete a supplemental survey. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were generated for survey items. Service-experienced and service-naive survey responses Pearson chi-square and Welch t tests were used to determine significant differences between service-experienced and service-naive responses for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: In total, all 17 patients who contacted the research team agreed to participate in interviews, with 8 service-experienced and 9 service-naive interviews completed. Template analysis identified 14 subdomains across the SERVQUAL domains. Similarities and differences in service preferences between groups were identified, focusing on patient-pharmacist trust, past service experience, and WTP. All interview participants completed supplemental surveys, with no statistically significant differences between service-experienced and service-naive participant characteristics identified. CONCLUSIONS: Service-experienced patients emphasized components of the service that contribute to service quality and generally reported higher WTP values. Many service-naive patients were unaware community pharmacies provided consultation services, suggesting that pharmacists may benefit from considering how services are offered to patients based on the specific preferences and expectations and consider ways to increase awareness of service offerings.

Examining the case for direct contracting: A multistakeholder case study.

BACKGROUND: Employers and pharmacies are challenged by a complex system for prescription payment. Cost plus direct contracts for prescriptions and bundled services may yield benefits. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) explore direct contracting using multistakeholder interviews, (2) compare employer costs and employee copays for 6 months of prescription charges under their pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) with projected costs under a pharmacy direct contract, (3) project pharmacy revenue, costs, and net profit had these prescriptions been processed through the direct contract, and (4) assess employee satisfaction under the direct contract. METHODS: Semistructured stakeholder interviews were recorded transcribed and analyzed to identify different perspectives on direct contracting. Employer PBM invoices for 412 employee prescriptions over 6 months were analyzed to calculate employer and employee costs and reanalyzed for the invoice cost plus $12 professional fee direct contract. For the pharmacy financial analysis projection, invoice costs and a $9.82 cost of dispensing were subtracted from total revenue to yield an estimated profit had the parties been under the arrangement. A 34-item satisfaction survey was mailed using a 4-contact design with cash incentives to the 20 employees serviced by the direct contract that were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Eight stakeholder interviews described the benefits and potential challenges of such direct contracts. The financial analysis suggested the employer costs would be $5664 lower and employee copays would have been $1918 lower had all prescriptions been paid using the direct contract. The estimated profit for the pharmacy was projected at $899. Survey respondents were generally satisfied with the direct contract, but few used the bundled services. CONCLUSION: The direct contract may be financially beneficial for all parties. It also may offer more transparent pricing that may be desirable for the employer and pharmacy. Greater uptake of bundled services may increase the value to the employer.

Hepatitis C screening in a community pharmacy setting: Patient perspective.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an infection of the liver, which contributes to over 15,000 deaths in the United States annually. When treated, HCV has a 90% or greater cure rate, however testing for HCV remains low. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient perspectives on HCV screenings in the community pharmacy setting including awareness of screening, willingness to be screened, barriers to screening, and willingness to pay for HCV screening. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional survey design. The surveys were distributed by staff at an independent community pharmacy participating in an HCV screening initiative through the state department of public health. Eligible patients were born between 1945 and 1965. Descriptive statistics were calculated for survey variables. Open-ended responses were analyzed for additional context. RESULTS: Fifty-seven surveys were returned and analyzed. The majority of the respondents were White (94%), female (56%), and had some college education (26%). Only 7% were aware that a finger-stick point-of-care test was available and 67% were unaware of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for testing. The most frequently reported barrier or hesitation to screening was the patient not thinking they were at risk (29%) followed by uncertainty about cost (14%). Over half of respondents (63%) were either somewhat interested or very interested in testing in a community pharmacy, however, the majority (71%) were not willing to pay or only willing to pay less than $20. CONCLUSIONS: Survey respondents were largely unaware of the recommendations and availability of finger-stick HCV screenings at community pharmacies but many were willing to be tested if low-cost. Providing patient education on the importance of HCV screenings and CDC recommendations may bolster interest in screening.

Community pharmacists' counseling regarding nicotine replacement therapy: A secret shopper study.

BACKGROUND: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is a safe and effective non-prescription tobacco cessation treatment. While most community-based pharmacists periodically provide patient education regarding NRT, there is a gap in real-world evidence assessing the counseling provided. OBJECTIVES: To assess community pharmacist counseling regarding NRT in a real-world setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional secret shopper audit was conducted to collect data regarding NRT counseling from 120 community pharmacist encounters. Seventeen trained college of pharmacy students presented to community pharmacies using a standardized script asking about 1 of 3 common NRT products (patch, gum, and lozenge). Pharmacies were randomly selected from a list of all community pharmacies open to the public in Bexar County, Texas. A standardized assessment form was used to document product availability, counseling length, whether or not the 7 counseling points and 6 assessment questions that could help guide the pharmacist's counseling regarding NRT products were provided without prompting, and potential inaccuracy of any recommendations and counseling points. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and analysis of variance and Fisher's exact test were used to test for variation across site type and time of day. RESULTS: NRT was available for purchase without speaking to pharmacy staff in 99 of 120 (83%) pharmacies. The mean length of counseling was 136 (standard deviation = 91) seconds. The most common points discussed were recommended strength (72%), tapering schedule (58%), and assessment of the daily number of cigarettes smoked (56%). Forty-one (34%) pharmacists provided one or more potentially inaccurate counseling points, the most common being inaccurate tapering schedule (provided during 31 (26%) encounters). Only 15% of pharmacists referred auditors for additional help or recommended a follow-up. CONCLUSION: NRT was commonly accessible in community pharmacies outside of the pharmacy area. Opportunities for pharmacists to provide more complete and accurate information to better assist patients with safe and effective smoking cessation were identified.

Leadership aspiration: An intersectional analysis of racial and gender equity in pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: The glass ceiling is a metaphor used to describe an invisible barrier that prevents an underrepresented group from rising beyond a certain level. Among pharmacists, underrepresented groups face various barriers and limitations to their successes. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to apply the intersectionality framework to data collected from the 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Study (NPWS) to understand the association of gender and race with leadership aspiration among pharmacists, including differences in perceived barriers and attractors for pursuing leadership. METHODS: The 2019 NPWS was conducted using an electronic Qualtrics survey. Three e-mails containing the survey link were sent to a systematic random sample of 94,803 pharmacists through the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Foundation e-profile system. The 2019 NPWS had an overall response rate of 6% (5705/94,803). A total of 8466 pharmacists clicked on the survey link, resulting in a usable response rate of 67.3% (5705/8466). Data were analyzed in SPSS software using descriptive and Pearson's r and chi-square test statistics. RESULTS: Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) pharmacists reported holding 10.7% of all leadership positions. Leadership positions included manager, assistant manager, executive, dean, director, chief pharmacy officer, owner or partner, and other leadership position types. White men and women reported the lowest interest in leadership (38.8% and 37.7%), whereas Black men (65.1%), Latinas (59.2%), Black women (58.5%), and Latinos (57.1%) had the highest interest in leadership. "The ability to make an impact" was the most frequently selected attractor for wanting to pursue leadership, selected by 92.5% and 79.6% of Black men and women, respectively, 77.8% of Other women, and 76.9% of Latinos. At graduation from pharmacy school, the student debt loan average of all graduation years ranged from $63,886 (± $73,701) for Other men to $112,384 (± $105,417) for Black women. Higher student loan debt was positively correlated with wanting to pursue a leadership position (r = 0.22, P < 0.001). Black women graduating 2011-2019 had the highest student loan debt at graduation ($194,456 ± $88,898). CONCLUSION: Interest in leadership positions by BIPOC pharmacists compared with reported leadership roles were inversely correlated. Understanding the discrepancy in interest in leadership and reported leadership positions held, particularly with relation to race and gender, is essential to understanding equity in pharmacy leadership. Further research is warranted to understand the factors that impede the ascension of women and underrepresented pharmacists into leadership positions.

Barriers to Increasing Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.

Prescription drug monitoring programs are implemented through individual state policies and are one solution to curb the opioid crisis. The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the multidisciplinary experiences using this program in practice; (2) identify limitations of the program and the desired features for improvement; and (3) characterize expectations for improved access when prescription drug monitoring programs are embedded in the electronic health record. A qualitative descriptive study design used semistructured interviews of 15 multidisciplinary healthcare providers. Textual data were analyzed using content analysis. Results showed the prescription drug monitoring program was helpful to decision-making processes related to opioid prescribing and referral to treatment; there were barriers limiting healthcare providers' use of the prescription drug monitoring program; preferences were delineated for integrating prescription drug monitoring program into electronic health record; and recommendations were provided to improve the program and increase use. In conclusion, the prescription drug monitoring program was viewed as useful in making strides to reduce the impact of inappropriate opioid prescribing in our country. By engaging a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers, solutions were offered to improve the interface and function of the prescription drug monitoring program to assist in increasing use.

Pharmacist counseling when dispensing naloxone by standing order: A secret shopper study of 4 chain pharmacies.

BACKGROUND: Texas has passed legislation to increase access to naloxone, the opioid overdose antidote, allowing pharmacists to dispense by standing order without an outside prescription. Given this added responsibility, there is a need to assess real-world counseling provided by pharmacists when dispensing naloxone. OBJECTIVES: Assess naloxone accessibility and counseling provided by community pharmacists when dispensing naloxone by standing order. METHODS: A total of 11 student pharmacists (mean age 25 years; 63.6% female; primarily Hispanic [36.4%], Asian [27.3%], and white [27.3%]) audited community pharmacies by presenting to purchase naloxone. Variables included naloxone availability and price, counseling duration, and whether 13 predetermined counseling points were provided unprompted. Shoppers were prepared with a background story if asked so that each answered questions consistently. All shoppers participated in two 1-hour training sessions, including verification of their ability to accurately assess naloxone counseling. Pharmacies in Bexar County, TX were selected randomly from 4 pharmacy chains, each of which have implemented statewide standing orders within their chain. Descriptive statistics were calculated. A Fisher exact test and linear mixed-effects regression model were used to assess variation across chains in whether naloxone was dispensed and the mean total number of counseling points provided, respectively. RESULTS: The shoppers audited 45 pharmacies. Naloxone was dispensed in 31 of 45 (68.9%) encounters (mean cost: $129.59). The mean counseling duration was 89 seconds. The most common counseling points included: administration technique (24 of 31), readministration of second dose (22 of 31), and calling 9-1-1 (20 of 31). All other points were included in less than one-third of pharmacists' counseling. Across the 4 chains, there was significant variation in naloxone dispensing and the number of counseling points provided. CONCLUSION: Secret shoppers were unable to access naloxone from nearly one-third of pharmacies. Counseling often excluded concepts pertinent to patient safety and effectiveness, suggesting opportunities remain to promote consistent, high-quality naloxone counseling in community pharmacies.

Snapshot of unemployed pharmacists from the 2019 National Pharmacy Workforce Survey.

BACKGROUND: Prior national surveys have quantified unemployment in the pharmacy workforce, and recent surveys have occurred in a changing environment, with increased numbers of pharmacists in the labor market. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the rate of unemployment and situations of unemployed pharmacists. METHODS: Data from the 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey were analyzed, focusing on an initial question about employment status and follow-up questions for unemployed respondents about whether they were seeking a job, the reason they were unemployed, and how long they had been unemployed. RESULTS: Overall, 4.4% of the respondents were unemployed, with higher rates occurring for female pharmacists, older pharmacist cohorts, and respondents of color, with the highest rate occurring (9.3%) for Black pharmacists. Most (74.4%) of the unemployed pharmacists were seeking a job in pharmacy, but 16.6% were not seeking any job. Nearly two-thirds of the unemployed pharmacist respondents had left the workforce involuntarily, with men at higher rates than women. The youngest cohort of unemployed pharmacists was the least likely to be forced to leave and more likely to leave for workplace-related or personal reasons. Black pharmacists had the overall highest rate of leaving the workforce involuntarily. On average, the unemployed pharmacists had been out of work nearly 2 years (19.2 months), and the periods out of work ranged widely. Those seeking a job in pharmacy predominantly (75.7%) had been unemployed for 1 year or less. More than half of the pharmacists involuntarily unemployed had been unemployed for 6 months or less. CONCLUSION: An increased rate of unemployment and a higher proportion of those unemployed seeking work occurred in this most recent national survey of the pharmacist workforce. Differences in the extent of unemployment and whether leaving the workforce was voluntary or involuntary occurred in pharmacists of color and in some age cohorts.

An intersectional review of discrimination and harassment experiences in pharmacy: Findings from the 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey.

BACKGROUND: Most pharmacists in the United States are women, and the profession is becoming more racially diverse. The recent increase in political and social movements in the United States has heightened our awareness of the importance of better understanding the experiences of underrepresented individuals and groups. Little is known about discrimination and harassment in the profession of pharmacy in the United States. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to provide evidence that discrimination and harassment exist in the pharmacy profession and explore differences in discrimination and harassment using the intersectionality of race and sex. METHODS: The 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey (NPWS) utilized an electronic survey that was distributed using a 3-contact Dillman approach by email to a randomized sample of 96,110 licensed pharmacists from all 50 U.S. states using the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Foundation e-profile system. The 2019 NPWS included a new battery of questions to assess the prevalence of discrimination and harassment in pharmacy. RESULTS: The most common bases of discrimination experienced were based on age (31.2%), sex (29%), and race or ethnicity (16.6%). The most common type of harassment experienced was "hearing demeaning comments related to race or ethnicity" at 15.6%. The intersectionality analysis revealed different experiences among sex or race combinations. Black and Asian male pharmacists had the highest rate of "hearing demeaning comments about race or ethnicity." Nonwhite pharmacists were more likely to experience harassment from customers or patients compared with their white colleagues. Black female pharmacists had the highest rate of being "very unsatisfied" with the results of reporting discrimination and harassment to their employer. CONCLUSION: Discrimination, including harassment and sexual harassment, is illegal, immoral, and unjust. As the profession of pharmacy continues to become more diverse, there must be a conscious, systemic, and sustained effort to create and maintain workplaces that are safe, equitable, and free of discrimination.

Factors Influencing Judgments to Consult Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Factorial Survey Experiment.

BACKGROUND: Prescription monitoring programs (PMPs) can provide health care professionals with valuable information. However, few studies have explored providers' decision making for accessing PMPs. AIMS: This study aimed to identify provider characteristics and situational factors most influencing perceived importance of consulting the PMP for patients in a simulated context. DESIGN: The study used a cross-sectional factorial survey. SETTINGS: The survey was administered electronically. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Community pharmacists, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and physicians in Iowa. METHODS: Participants were recruited by mail which included a link to the online survey. The survey consisted of demographic questions, eight randomly generated vignettes, and one ranked item. The vignettes described a hypothetical prescription using eight experimental variables whose levels were randomly varied. Respondents evaluated each vignette for importance to access the PMP. Analyses used linear mixed-effects models in R (Version 3.5.0). RESULTS: A total of 138 responses were available for multilevel analysis. Women, physicians, and APRNs rated it more important to consult the PMP for a given prescription compared with men and pharmacists. Accessing a PMP was perceived as more important with cash payments, quantity dispensed, suspicion for misuse, hydromorphone and oxycodone prescriptions, and headache. Advancing age, postoperative pain, and anxiety or sleep indications were associated with less importance. CONCLUSIONS: Age, indication for prescribing, misuse, and payment mode each independently had greater importance to providers in accessing the PMP. This was the first study to isolate the influence of different controlled substances on how important it was to consult the PMP.

Provider beliefs on the Barriers and Facilitators to Prescription Monitoring Programs and Mandated Use.

Background: Underutilization of Prescription monitoring programs (PMP), especially in states where participation is voluntary could limit their impact against opioid epidemic. Objectives: To (1) examine PMP use among Iowa healthcare providers (HCPs); (2) identify factors prompting and impeding PMP use, and (3) assess beliefs toward mandating PMP use. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Iowa HCPs was conducted using a 12-item questionnaire. Survey domains include demographics, current PMP utilization, conditions and barriers associated with PMP use, and perspectives on use mandates. Analyses were based on descriptive statistics, proportional odds and poisson regression models. Results: There were 704 usable responses. Almost all respondents were registered with the PMP with dentists having the lowest rate (p < .001). Nurse practitioners consulted the PMP for the largest proportion of prescriptions, while pharmacists and dentists used significantly less (p < .001). Lack of time was the most common reported barrier impeding PMP use. Red flag behaviors and unfamiliarity with patient were the most common conditions prompting PMP review. HCPs estimated their use of the PMP would significantly increase if integrated into their electronic health records (p < .001). Almost half of HCPs held the opinion that PMP use should never be mandated, although inter-provider variation was present with nurse practitioners most amenable to mandates. Discussion: HCPs displayed variation in PMP use. EMR integration appears to be a strategy for increasing PMP use. There was resistance to mandating PMP use for all controlled substances prescribed and dispensed, with some interest in mandates for new patients only or new controlled substance prescriptions only.

Use of a fall risk evaluation in a community-based pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Falls in older adults are a serious public health concern. They increase health care expenditure and account for more than $30 billion in direct medical costs. Medication-related problems can contribute to fall risk, and community-based pharmacists are well positioned to intervene, given their role in monitoring ongoing medications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the integration of a fall risk screening assessment (i.e., Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries [STEADI]) into community pharmacy practice and to report on the targeted medication management interventions that pharmacists made for patients aged 50 years or older with a fall risk potential. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: A service-oriented independent pharmacy in the Midwest United States that uses an in-house clinical software program to perform a prospective drug utilization review and document clinical interventions. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A 3-item STEADI fall risk screening assessment was administered from October 15, 2018, to January 31, 2019, to 311 pharmacy patrons aged 50 years or older taking high-risk medications. EVALUATION: For those with a positive screen for fall risk, the 12-item STEADI fall risk assessment was administered. A pharmacist performed a comprehensive medication review (CMR) for these patients. Education and medication recommendations were provided. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (17%) responded "Yes" to at least 1 prescreening question. The mean total STEADI fall risk score was 5.7 out of 12. The most commonly reported STEADI item was a worry regarding falling (75.5%) and sometimes feeling unsteady when walking (67.9%). Education regarding falls was provided to all the patients who received the study CMR, but only 6 medication changes were made to the prescribers, of which 4 were accepted. CONCLUSION: The STEADI assessment was useful in identifying patients who were potentially at a risk of falls. More work pertaining to deprescribing high-risk medications for at-risk patients seems to be needed.

The developing role of community pharmacists in facilitating care transitions: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The impact of multidisciplinary interventions to support patients moving from hospital to home have generally demonstrated a benefit. However, the role of community pharmacists is still being defined. OBJECTIVES: To review, with the use of the Coleman Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) pillars, the interventions performed by community and ambulatory-care pharmacists for patients undergoing care transitions. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched for manuscripts published from 1997 to 2017: Pubmed, Cochrane Database, Cinahl, and Embase. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors screened manuscripts for relevancy. Studies were included if they evaluated patient care processes by community or ambulatory-care pharmacists as part of care transitions beyond receiving a discharge summary. Data were abstracted by one author and reviewed by the other. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the review, 8 of which were from the community setting. Each CTI pillar was represented, although to differing degrees. Pharmacists applied their experience in reviewing medications, identifying and resolving drug therapy problems, and providing education to this new context. Better mechanisms are needed to notify pharmacists of patients undergoing transition, grant access to medical records, and provide appropriate reimbursement. The CTI pillars of assisting patients with personal health records and discussing condition red flags were infrequently used, suggesting an area for exploration. CONCLUSION: Although there are important structural barriers to address, community pharmacists are increasingly positioned to contribute to care transitions, and there are numerous interventions that can be combined when creating new programs.

Analysis of oral dietary supplement use in rural older adults.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe and explore characteristics associated with oral dietary supplement use and identify potential interactions with prescription medications in a sample of rural community-dwelling older adults. BACKGROUND: Older adults use polypharmacy to help manage chronic diseases. Due to healthcare access disparities, rural older adults may consider dietary supplement use as an alternative approach to maintain health and manage disease. Oral dietary supplement use is expected to increase among ageing adults; placing them at risk for potential interactions and adverse events. DESIGN: A secondary analysis was conducted on oral dietary supplement, medication and health characteristic data collected on N = 138 participants. The original study was adherent to STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Researchers found that 83% of the rural older adults used oral dietary supplements in addition to their prescribed medications. Participants took additional single-dose vitamins along with their multivitamin; 57% took vitamin D, 52% took calcium, 15% took vitamin C and 13% took additional potassium and vitamin E. Participants also used oral dietary supplements with medications that had a potential for interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with national samples of older adults, a high percentage of rural older adults used oral dietary supplements in addition to their prescribed medications. In the rural setting, older adults are at risk for potential drug-oral dietary supplement interactions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses can conduct vigilant medication reconciliation that includes documenting characteristics of oral dietary supplement use. Nurses can assist with providing appropriate dietary supplements education that promotes patient knowledge and prevent inappropriate use; particularly when caring for older adults from rural settings.

The Association Between Technology Use and Health Status in a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cohort: Multi-Method Study.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine and electronic health (eHealth) interventions have been proposed to improve management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for patients between traditional clinic and hospital visits to reduce complications. However, the effectiveness of such interventions may depend on patients' comfort with technology. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the relationship between patient demographics and COPD disease severity and the use of communication-related technology. METHODS: We administered a structured survey about the use of communication technologies to a cohort of persons in the COPDGene study at one midwestern hospital in the United States. Survey results were combined with clinical and demographic data previously collected as part of the cohort study. A subsample of patients also completed eHealth simulation tasks. We used logistic or linear regression to determine the relationship between patient demographics and COPD disease severity and reported use of communication-related technology and the results from our simulated eHealth-related tasks. RESULTS: A total of 686 patients completed the survey and 100 participated in the eHealth simulation. Overall, those who reported using communication technology were younger (P=.005) and had higher incomes (P=.03). Men appeared less likely to engage in text messaging (P<.001) than women. Patients who spent more time on tasks in the eHealth simulation had greater odds of a COPD Assessment Test score >10 (P=.02) and walked shorter distances in their 6-minute walk tests (P=.003) than those who took less time. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients, patients with lower incomes, and less healthy patients were less likely to report using communication technology, and they did not perform as well on our simulated eHealth tasks. Thus, eHealth-based interventions may not be as effective in these populations, and additional training in communication technology may be needed.

A community pharmacist-led service to facilitate care transitions and reduce hospital readmissions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a community pharmacist-delivered care transition intervention on 30-day hospital readmissions. SETTING: A single private 263-bed hospital in the Midwest United States and 12 partnering community pharmacies, 1 serving as primary pharmacy. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Adult general medicine inpatients were evaluated by nursing staff with the use of a worksheet based on the Better Outcomes by Optimizing Safe Transitions (BOOST) readmission risk toolkit. The highest-risk patients were enrolled in a 3-contact intervention. First, a pharmacist from the primary community pharmacy delivered an in-room work-up. The pharmacist focused on medication education, problem identification, and verifying medication access following discharge. A pharmacist visited the hospital for approximately 4 hours most weekdays, during which the pharmacist saw 3-4 patients. A community pharmacist telephoned these patients 8 and 25 days after discharge. EVALUATION: The intervention was provided to 555 patients who had a mean readmission risk worksheet score of 1.90 (SD 1.13) and not provided to 430 patients with lower readmission risk worksheet scores, which averaged 0.68 (SD 0.86; P < 0.001). Thirty-day readmissions to the study hospital were lower for intervention patients (8.1%) versus comparison patients (21.4%; P < 0.001). Thirty-day readmissions to any hospital were calculated for a subsample of 129 intervention patients and 103 comparison patients with Medicare Fee for Service insurance for which claims were available, but the difference (10.9% and 15.5%, respectively) did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.328). PRACTICE IMPLICATION: A community pharmacy was successful in partnering with a hospital and other community pharmacies to lead a care transitions intervention associated with reduced 30-day same-hospital readmissions. CONCLUSION: A community pharmacist-led intervention delivered to higher-risk patients showed a significant decrease in readmission rate to the same hospital compared with lower-risk patients hospitalized in the same unit but not receiving the intervention. This supports the community pharmacists' role in care transitions.