2023 EULAR classification criteria for hand osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to develop classification criteria for overall hand osteoarthritis (OA), interphalangeal OA and thumb base OA based on self-reported data and radiographic features. METHODS: The classification criteria sets were developed in three phases. In phase 1, we identified criteria that discriminated hand OA from controls. In phase 2, we used a consensus-based decision analysis approach to derive a clinician-based evaluation of the relative importance of the criteria. In phase 3, we refined the scoring system, determined the cut-offs for disease classification and compared the sensitivity and specificity of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria with the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. RESULTS: In persons with hand symptoms and no other disease (including psoriasis) or acute injury that can explain the hand symptoms (mandatory criteria), hand OA can be classified based on age, duration of morning stiffness, number of joints with osteophytes and joint space narrowing, and concordance between symptoms and radiographic findings. Using a sum of scores based on each diagnostic element, overall hand OA can be classified if a person achieves 9 or more points on a 0-15 scale. The cut-off for interphalangeal OA and thumb base OA is 8 points. While the EULAR criteria demonstrated better sensitivity than the ACR criteria in the phase 1 data set, the performance of the two criteria sets was similar in two external cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: International experts developed the EULAR criteria to classify overall hand OA, interphalangeal OA and thumb base OA in clinical studies using a rigorous methodology.

Validation of HAND OA US inflammatory and structural damage score (HOUSE) for thumb base joints: Systematic review on truth & discrimination.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, the HAND osteoarthritis (OA) ULTRASOUND (US) Examination (HOUSE) inflammatory and structural damage scores were developed by the OMERACT US working group. However, the thumb base was not or only partly included. This systematic review examines US scoring methods and scanning techniques assessing thumb base OA, alongside existing evidence on validity, reliability, and responsiveness. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy in three different databases identified 30 eligible studies. RESULTS: In general, studies predominantly focused on US assessment of the carpometacarpal (CMC) 1 joint, with fewer investigating the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint. Most studies utilized a semiquantitative scale for scoring structural and inflammatory features, aligning with the HOUSE scoring system. Validity was supported by a limited number of studies, with one demonstrating a positive association between US structural damage and radiographic damage, and another showing a similar association with function. Associations between US inflammatory features and pain were observed, albeit with some variability. Reliability was from moderate to good for the CMC1 joint but limited for STT joint. Responsiveness varied across studies. The methodological quality of included studies varied, indicating areas for future research improvement. CONCLUSION: While promising, additional research is necessary to validate the HOUSE scoring system and improve its clinical utility for thumb base OA assessment. Future research should concentrate on optimal scanning positions and on the reliability and responsiveness of the HOUSE scoring system.

RANKL blockade for erosive hand osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2a trial.

Erosive hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling disease with limited treatment options. Here we present the results of a monocentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase 2a clinical trial with denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand inhibitor, evaluating the effects on structure modification in erosive hand OA. Patients were randomized to 48 weeks treatment with denosumab 60 mg every 3 months (n = 51, 41 females) or placebo (n = 49, 37 females). The primary (radiographic) endpoint was the change in the total Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS) at week 24, where positive changes correspond to remodeling and negative changes to erosive progression. Secondary endpoints were the change in the GUSS at week 48 and the number of new erosive joints at week 48 by the anatomical phase scoring system. Baseline mean GUSS (standard deviation) of target joints was 155.9 (69.3) in the denosumab group and 158.7 (46.8) in the placebo group. The primary endpoint was met with an estimated difference between groups of 8.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 16.9; P = 0.024) at week 24. This effect was confirmed at week 48 (baseline adjusted GUSS (standard error of the mean) denosumab and placebo were 163.5 (2.9) and 149.2 (3.9), respectively; with an estimated difference between groups of 14.3 (95% CI 4.6 to 24.0; P = 0.003)). At patient level, more new erosive joints were developed in the placebo group compared with denosumab at week 48 (odds ratio 0.24 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.72); P = 0.009). More adverse events occurred in the placebo group (125 events in 44 patients (90%)) compared with the denosumab group (97 events in 41 patients (80%)). These results demonstrate that denosumab has structure modifying effects in erosive hand OA by inducing remodeling and preventing new erosive joints. EU Clinical Trials Register identifier 2015-003223-53 .