Imaging in early posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome: a comparison of diagnostic methods.

OBJECTIVES: The complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) still is difficult to diagnose in posttraumatic patients. As CRPS I is a clinical diagnosis the characteristic symptoms have to be differentiated from normal posttraumatic states. Several diagnostic procedures are applied to facilitate an early diagnosis, although their value for diagnosing posttraumatic CRPS I is unclear. METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients with distal radial fracture were followed up for 16 weeks after trauma. To assess the diagnostic value of the commonly applied methods a detailed clinical examination was carried out 2, 8, and 16 weeks after trauma in conjunction with bilateral thermography, plain radiographs of the hand skeleton, three phase bone scans (TPBSs), and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All imaging procedures were assessed blinded. RESULTS: At the end of the observation period 18 patients (11%) were clinically identified as having CRPS I and 13 patients (8%) revealed an incomplete clinical picture which were defined as CRPS borderline cases. The sensitivity of all diagnostic procedures used was poor and decreased between the first and the last examinations (thermography: 45% to 29%; TPBS: 19% to 14%; MRI: 43% to 13%; bilateral radiographs: 36%). In contrast a high specificity was observed in the TPBS and MRI at the eighth and sixteenth-week examinations (TPBS: 96%, 100%; MRI: 78%, 98%) and for bilateral radiographs 8 weeks after trauma (94%). The thermography presented a fair specificity that improved from the second to the sixteenth week (50% to 89%). DISCUSSION: The poor sensitivity of all tested procedures combined with a reasonable specificity produced a low positive predictive value (17% to 60%) and a moderate negative predictive value (79% to 86%). These results suggest, that those procedures cannot be used as screening tests. Imaging methods are not able to reliably differentiate between normal posttraumatic changes and changes due to CRPS I. Clinical findings remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of CRPS I and the procedures described above may serve as additional tools to establish the diagnosis in doubtful cases.

Surgical and endovascular treatment of symptomatic aberrant right subclavian artery (arteria lusoria).

Right aberrant subclavian artery, also called arteria lusoria, is one of the most common intrathoracic arterial anomalies. Although mostly asymptomatic, the retroesophageal and retrotracheal course of the lusorian artery might result in unspecific thoracic pain, dysphagia, dyspnea, arterioesophageal or arteriotracheal fistulae with hematemesis or hemoptysis, and aneurysmal formation with relevant risk of rupture. The purpose was to present our experience with six patients with a symptomatic aberrant right subclavian artery, two patients with dysphagia or dyspnea caused by a nonaneurysmal lusorian artery, and four patients with arteria lusoria aneurysms. The operative procedures performed are described and discussed in view of the data reported in the literature. According to the classification of the lusorian artery pathology, a combined intervention with right subclavian artery transposition, distal or proximal lusorian artery ligation or proximal endovascular occlusion for nonaneurysmal disease, or endovascular thoracic aortic stent graft implantation for lusorian artery aneurysms seems to be an additional and minimally invasive approach with promising midterm results.

MR imaging of ulnocarpal impaction after fracture of the distal radius.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the incidence of ulnocarpal impaction after distal radius fracture using MR imaging and to correlate imaging findings with those of radiography and clinical findings. CONCLUSION: Ulnocarpal impaction is a common finding after distal radius fracture. MR imaging can detect characteristic bone marrow changes of the lunate early after the trauma. A significant correlation exists between MR imaging findings and the extent of posttraumatic ulnar variance and pain levels.