Outcomes and Costs of Common Surgical Procedures at Children's and Nonchildren's Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Variations in the management of pediatric patients at children's hospitals (CHs) and non-CHs (NCHs) have been well described, especially within the trauma literature. However, little is known about the outcomes and costs of common general surgical procedures at NCHs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of CH designation on the outcomes and costs of appendectomy and cholecystectomy. METHODS: The Kids' Inpatient Database (2003-2012) was queried for patients aged under 18 y who underwent appendectomy or cholecystectomy at CHs and NCHs. Outcomes analyzed included disease severity, complications, laparoscopy, length of stay (LOS), and cost. RESULTS: Most of appendectomies and cholecystectomies were performed at NCHs. Overall, CHs cared for younger children were more likely to be teaching hospitals, had higher costs, and longer LOS. On multivariate analysis for appendectomies, CHs were associated with higher rates of perforated appendicitis (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.42-1.66, P < 0.001), less complications (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.61-0.75, P < 0.001), increased laparoscopy (OR = 2.93, 95% CI = 2.36-3.64, P < 0.001), longer LOS (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.09-1.17, P < 0.001), and higher costs (exponentiated log $ = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13-1.24, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for cholecystectomies revealed that CHs were associated with less laparoscopy (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.50-0.67, P < 0.001), longer LOS (RR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.19-1.34, P < 0.001), and higher costs (exponentiated log $ = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22-1.37, P < 0.001) with similar complications. Independent predictors of LOS and cost included CH designation, negative appendectomy, perforated appendicitis, complications, younger age, black patients, and public insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in surgical management, outcomes, and costs after appendectomy and cholecystectomy exist between CHs and NCHs. CHs excelled in treating complicated appendicitis. NCHs effectively performed cholecystectomies. These differences in outcomes require further investigation to identify modifiable factors to optimize care across all hospitals for these common surgical diseases.

Regional variations in outcomes and cost of appendectomy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The study of regional variations in surgical outcomes and cost has been used to identify areas for improvement and savings. This study investigates potential regional differences in the outcomes and cost of adult appendicitis. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in rates of laparoscopy, perforation, morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and cost among different regions of the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the California (CA), New York (NY), and Florida (FL) State Inpatient Databases from 2005-2011. Patients between the ages of 18-69 who underwent nonincidental appendectomy in the three different states were evaluated with hierarchical and multivariate negative binomial regression analyses. Primary outcomes included laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, LOS, and cost. RESULTS: There were 371,354 appendectomies performed. Multivariate analysis revealed multiple regional differences. Patients in FL were most likely to get laparoscopy (P < 0.01). CA had higher rates of perforation than NY (P < 0.01) and FL (P < 0.05). CA also had higher rates of negative appendectomy compared to both NY and FL (P < 0.01). Morbidity was lower in NY compared to CA and FL (P < 0.01). The LOS was shortest in CA (P < 0.01), despite CA having the highest median per patient cost (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional variations do exist with CA having the highest rate of perforation and negative appendectomy. Patients in CA also incurred the highest overall costs. A better understanding of the factors that drive these variations will help improve outcomes and lower cost across all states.

Beta4 tubulin identifies a primitive cell source for oligodendrocytes in the mammalian brain.

We have identified a novel population of cells in the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the mammalian brain that expresses beta4 tubulin (betaT4) and has properties of primitive neuroectodermal cells. betaT4 cells are scattered throughout the SVZ of the lateral ventricles in adult human brain and are significantly increased in the SVZs bordering demyelinated white matter in multiple sclerosis brains. In human fetal brain, betaT4 cell densities peak during the latter stages of gliogenesis, which occurs in the SVZ of the lateral ventricles. betaT4 cells represent <2% of the cells present in neurospheres generated from postnatal rat brain but >95% of cells in neurospheres treated with the anti-mitotic agent Ara C. betaT4 cells produce oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes in vitro. We compared the myelinating potential of betaT4-positive cells with A2B5-positive oligodendrocyte progenitor cells after transplantation (25,000 cells) into postnatal day 3 (P3) myelin-deficient rat brains. At P20, the progeny of betaT4 cells myelinated up to 4 mm of the external capsule, which significantly exceeded that of transplanted A2B5-positive progenitor cells. Such extensive and rapid mature CNS cell generation by a relatively small number of transplanted cells provides in vivo support for the therapeutic potential of betaT4 cells. We propose that betaT4 cells are an endogenous cell source that can be recruited to promote neural repair in the adult telencephalon.

Assessing outcomes and costs of appendectomies performed at rural hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to assess the outcomes and costs of appendectomies performed at rural and urban hospitals. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (2001-2012) was queried for appendectomies at urban and rural hospitals. Outcomes (disease severity, laparoscopy, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost) were analyzed. RESULTS: Rural patients were more likely to be older, male, white, and have Medicaid or no insurance. Rural hospitals were associated with higher negative appendectomy rates (OR = 1.26,95%CI = 1.18-1.34,p < 0.01), less laparoscopy use (OR = 0.65,95%CI = 0.58-0.72,p < 0.01), and slightly shorter LOS (OR = 0.98,95%CI = 0.97-0.99,p < 0.01). There was no consistent association with perforated appendicitis and no difference in complications or costs after adjusting for hospital volume. Yearly trends showed a significant increase in the cases utilizing laparoscopy each year at rural hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Rural appendectomies are associated with increased negative appendectomy rates and less laparoscopy use with no difference in complications or costs compared to urban hospitals.

Primary Colonic Lymphoma.

Primary colonic lymphoma is a rare large bowel malignancy usually found in the cecum or rectosigmoid junction. Because of its non-specific symptoms, patients often present with advanced disease requiring surgical intervention. Nevertheless, resection followed by chemotherapy appears to offer the best prognosis.

Impact of Children's Hospital Designation on Outcomes and Costs after Cholecystectomy in Adolescent Patients.

Variations in the management of adolescents at children's hospitals (CHs) and nonchildren's hospitals (NCHs) have been well described in the trauma literature. However, the effects of CH designation on outcomes after common general surgical procedures have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and costs of adolescent cholecystectomies performed at CHs and NCHs. Within the California State Inpatient Database (2005-2011), we identified 8117 cholecystectomy patients aged 13 to 18 years at CHs and NCHs. Outcomes (laparoscopy, intraoperative cholangiogram, length of stay (LOS), and complications) and costs were analyzed. CHs cared for younger patients, more uninsured patients, and more black patients. NCHs were associated with higher laparoscopy use (95.7% vs 88.3%, P < 0.01), higher intraoperative cholangiogram rates (28.8% vs 11.9%, P < 0.001), shorter LOS (3.2 vs 5.0 days, P < 0.01), and lower costs by $5797 per patient ($11,219 vs $17,016, P < 0.01). Although there was no significant difference in overall complication rates, CHs had higher rates of infectious complications (2.0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.004). Adolescent cholecystectomies are safely performed at NCHs while achieving increased laparoscopy use, shorter LOS, and lower costs compared with CHs.

Outcomes and Costs of Managing Appendicitis at Safety-Net Hospitals.

IMPORTANCE: Safety-net hospitals serve vulnerable populations with limited resources. Although complex, elective operations performed at safety-net hospitals have been associated with inferior outcomes and higher costs, it is unclear whether a similar association has been seen with common emergency general surgery performed at safety-net hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of safety-net burden with the outcomes of appendectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review was conducted of all nonfederally funded hospitals in the California state inpatient database that performed appendectomies from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011. A total of 349 hospitals performing 274 405 nonincidental appendectomies were stratified based on safety-net burden; low-burden hospitals had the lowest quartile of patients who either had Medicaid or were uninsured (0%-14%), medium-burden hospitals had the middle 2 quartiles (15%-41%), and high-burden hospitals had the highest quartile (>42%). Data analysis was performed from August 27 to September 8, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, length of stay, and cost. RESULTS: Among the 349 hospitals in the study, high-burden hospitals treated a larger proportion of black patients than did medium- and low-burden hospitals (4.5% vs 2.4% vs 2.9%; P = .01), as well as Hispanic patients (64.8% vs 27.0% vs 22.0%; P < .001) and patients with perforated appendicitis (27.6% vs 23.6% vs 23.6%; P = .005). High-burden hospitals were less likely than medium- or low-burden hospitals to use laparoscopy (51.6% vs 60.7% vs 71.9%; P < .001). There were no differences in morbidity, length of stay, or cost. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that high-burden hospitals were more likely than low-burden hospitals to treat perforated appendicitis (log %, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P = .04) and less likely to use laparoscopy (-16.9% difference; 95% CI, -26.1% to -7.6%; P < .001), while achieving similar complication rates. Multivariable analysis also confirmed that high-burden hospitals have similar costs, despite being associated with longer length of stay (relative risk, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.09-1.26; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Safety-net hospitals treat a disproportionate number of patients with advanced appendicitis while falling behind in the use of laparoscopy. Nonetheless, safety-net hospitals treat this common surgical emergency with morbidity and cost similar to that seen at other hospitals. Additional research is needed to evaluate how these outcomes are achieved to improve all surgical outcomes at underresourced hospitals.

Management and Outcomes of Appendectomy during Pregnancy.

Acute appendicitis is a common nonobstetric indication for surgical intervention during pregnancy with serious potential complications for the mother and fetus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presentation, management practices, outcomes, and costs of appendectomy during pregnancy. We did a retrospective analysis of 62,118 nonincidental appendectomies performed in women (age 15-45 years) identified from the California State Inpatient Database (2005-2011). Primary outcomes included diagnosis or type of appendicitis, use of laparoscopy, morbidity, length of stay, and cost. Pregnant women were less likely to undergo laparoscopy (OR = 0.51, P < 0.01). Pregnancy had no effect on perforation rates, but was associated with higher rates of negative appendectomy (OR = 9.29, P < 0.01). Pregnancy was not associated with nonpregnancy-related complications after appendectomy. Pregnant women had longer length of stay (RR = 1.07, P < 0.01) but similar costs. Appendectomy did increase risk of preterm delivery at the time of surgical admission (19.5 vs 8.8%, P < 0.01). However, once discharged, there was no difference in rates of preterm delivery (9.1 vs 8.9%, P = 0.23). Pregnant women had higher rates of negative appendectomy with lower rates of laparoscopy. Despite these differences, there was no difference in nonpregnancy-related morbidity and cost. Appendectomy did increase risk of preterm birth, but the increased risk normalized over time.

Addressing the quality and cost of cholecystectomy at a safety net hospital.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of safety-net burden on outcomes of a common, urgent operation like cholecystectomy. METHODS: We identified all cholecystectomies performed from 2005 to 2011 in the California State Inpatient Database and separated them into three cohorts based on the performing hospital's safety-net burden. Hierarchical multivariable regression analyses were performed with outcomes including laparoscopy, advanced disease, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and cost. RESULTS: Safety-net hospitals had similar rates of laparoscopy, overall advanced disease, and post-operative morbidity. Yet, they were able to maintain lower overall costs (cost difference -5592, 95% CI -8928, -2256, p < 0.01), despite having similar lengths of stay. CONCLUSION: Safety-net hospitals performed cholecystectomy with similar rates of laparoscopy and morbidity, while achieving lower costs. Safety-net hospitals may be well equipped to perform common, urgent operations like cholecystectomy.