RESUMO
PURPOSE: Androgen receptor splice variant 7 (ARV-7) is a resistance mechanism to hormonal therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It has been associated with poor outcomes. On progression to castrate resistance, ARV-7 positivity has been identified in global populations at an incidence of 17.8%-28.8%. Here, we characterize the incidence of ARV-7 positivity in Asian patients with mCRPC in a prospective fashion and evaluate its implications on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients with mCRPC from multiple centers in Southeast and East Asia were enrolled in a prospective manner before initiation of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors or docetaxel. ARV-7 status was evaluated at baseline with three commercially available assays: AdnaTest Prostate Cancer platform, Clearbridge method, and IBN method. Clinical outcomes at progression were assessed. The primary end point of this study was prevalence of ARV-7 positivity; secondary end points were incidence of ARV-7 positivity, prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate, PSA progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients with a median age of 72 years at enrollment participated. Overall, an incidence of ARV-7 positivity of between 14.3% and 33.7% in Asian patients with mCRPC was demonstrated depending on the assay used. Patients found to have ARV-7 positivity at enrollment had a numerically worse PSA PFS compared with ARV-7 negative patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, the incidence of ARV-7 positivity in Asian patients with mCRPC was shown to be similar to the global population. Patients with ARV-7 positivity appear to have more aggressive disease with numerically worse PSA PFS and OS. Further prospective studies are needed to fully characterize the relationship that ARV-7 positivity has on prognosis of Asian patients with mCRPC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Receptores Androgênicos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/genética , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Idoso , Receptores Androgênicos/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático/genética , Metástase Neoplásica , Isoformas de ProteínasRESUMO
Introduction: There has been a rapid evolution in the treatment strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following the identification of targetable mutations, making genetic testing essential for patient selection. Although several international guidelines recommend genetic testing for patients with mCRPC, there is a lack of locally endorsed clinical practice guidelines in Singapore. Method: A multidisciplinary specialist panel with representation from medical and radiation oncology, urology, pathology, interventional radiology, and medical genetics discussed the challenges associated with patient selection, genetic counselling and sample processing in mCRPC. Results: A clinical model for incorporating genetic testing into routine clinical practice in Singapore was formulated. Tumour testing with an assay that is able to detect both somatic and germline mutations should be utilised. The panel also recommended the "mainstreaming" approach for genetic counselling in which pre-test counselling is conducted by the managing clinician and post-test discussion with a genetic counsellor, to alleviate the bottlenecks at genetic counselling stage in Singapore. The need for training of clinicians to provide pre-test genetic counselling and educating the laboratory personnel for appropriate sample processing that facilitates downstream genetic testing was recognised. Molecular tumour boards and multidisciplinary discussions are recommended to guide therapeutic decisions in mCRPC. The panel also highlighted the issue of reimbursement for genetic testing to reduce patient-borne costs and increase the reach of genetic testing among this patient population. Conclusion: This article aims to provide strategic and implementable recommendations to overcome the challenges in genetic testing for patients with mCRPC in Singapore.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento Genético , Testes Genéticos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Humanos , Masculino , Singapura , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/genética , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Aconselhamento Genético/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Mutação , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Several small studies have reviewed the efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP) in clinical practice outside a trial setting. We report the largest cohort study of clinical outcomes in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with AAP in a multicenter multiracial clinical setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on mCRPC patients treated at four tertiary hospitals in Singapore from 2012 to 2017 was conducted. Disease characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary clinical end-point was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patients with various variables and OS curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Out of 200 patients with mCRPC treated with AAP, 163 (81.5%) patients were chemo-naïve (CN) and 37 (18.5%) patients were postchemotherapy (PC), with the median age of 68 (34-87) and 65 (52-80) years, respectively. Median OS was 20.0 (95% CI, 18.3-22.9) and 10.5 months (95% CI, 1.1-40.5) for CN and PC cohorts, respectively. A subset analysis of 108 patients showed a significantly longer OS in patients who had prior ADT for more than 12 months in CN patients (P < 0.001). Incidences of G3/G4 events were around 6.6%; most common side effect being hypertension with an incidence of 2.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of CN and PC patients with AAP was associated with a comparable OS and progression-free survival to the reported series. Patients who were responsive to prior ADT of 12 months or more were associated with an improved OS.
Assuntos
Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Singapura , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Stage IV melanoma exhibits a diverse range of tumor biology from indolent to aggressive disease. Many important prognostic factors have already been identified. Despite this, the behavior of metastatic melanoma remains difficult to predict. We sought to determine if any primary tumor characteristics affect survival following the diagnosis of stage IV melanoma. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma between January 2003 and December 2012 were identified from the Victorian Melanoma Service database. Retrospective chart review was performed to collect data on primary tumor characteristics (thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, melanoma subtype, or occult primary). Known and suspected prognostic factors were additionally collected (time to diagnosis of stage IV disease, age, sex, stage, receipt of chemotherapy, and era of recurrence). The effect of primary tumor characteristics on overall survival from the date of diagnosis of stage IV disease was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients with a median follow-up of 5 years from diagnosis of stage IV disease were identified. Median overall survival of the cohort was 250 days.Of the primary tumor characteristics assessed, only tumor thickness affected survival from diagnosis of stage IV disease, hazard ratio=1.09 (1.02 to 1.16), P=0.008. This remained significant in multivariate analysis, P=0.007. Other primary tumor characteristics did not significantly influence survival. CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumor thickness is a significant prognostic factor in stage IV melanoma. Our data suggest that the biology of the primary melanoma may persist to influence the behavior of metastatic disease.