Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

The presence of preexisting (memory) or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) is a known barrier to successful long-term organ transplantation. Yet, despite the fact that laboratory tools and our understanding of histocompatibility have advanced significantly in recent years, the criteria to define presence of a DSA and assign a level of risk for a given DSA vary markedly between centers. A collaborative effort between the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics and the American Society of Transplantation provided the logistical support for generating a dedicated multidisciplinary working group, which included experts in histocompatibility as well as kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. The goals were to perform a critical review of biologically driven, state-of-the-art, clinical diagnostics literature and to provide clinical practice recommendations based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The results of the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) meeting are summarized here, providing recommendations on the definition and utilization of HLA diagnostic testing, and a framework for clinical assessment of risk for a memory or a primary alloimmune response. The definitions, recommendations, risk framework, and highlighted gaps in knowledge are intended to spur research that will inform the next STAR Working Group meeting in 2019.

Metabolic syndrome in liver transplantation: A preoperative and postoperative concern.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is increasing among patients undergoing liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is a manifestation of metabolic syndrome and is an increasingly common cause of end-stage liver disease necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation. We sought to determine the effect of preoperative risk factors on the development of post-transplant metabolic syndrome, complications, readmissions, and mortality. METHODS: We conducted a review of 114 orthotopic liver transplantations at our institution from May 2012 to April 2014. RESULTS: Patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 95) metabolic syndrome were similar with regard to age, race, and model for end-stage liver disease at time of transplant. Donor and operative factors also were similar between the groups. Preoperative diabetes was found to be associated with an increased rate of readmission (odds ratio 3.45, P = .03). While preoperative metabolic syndrome itself was not a significant predictor of worse outcomes, postoperative metabolic syndrome was associated with significantly greater readmissions in the first year. Major predictors of new onset metabolic syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation included preoperative diabetes and obesity (odds ratio 8.54 and odds ratio 5.49, P < .01 each). CONCLUSION: Efforts to decrease the incidence of postoperative metabolic syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation may decrease readmissions and improve outcomes, along with decreasing resource utilization.

Use of Elderly Allografts in Liver Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The use of liver allografts from elderly donors (≥70 years) has increased because of organ shortage and increased life expectancy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current utilization of elderly donors in United States, recipient selection, and their posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: A linkage between Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and University HealthSystem Consortium databases was performed. Between January 2007 and December 2011, 12,445 liver transplant (LT) recipients were identified and divided into 2 cohorts based on donor age: 70 years or older (n = 540) and younger than 60 years (n = 10,473). RESULTS: Elderly donors accounted for 4.3% of all donors used in the 5-year period. When compared to younger donors, elderly donors were more likely to be women, shared regionally or nationally, and used at higher volume centers. Elderly donor allografts were less likely to be used in recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score higher than 27 (13.2% vs. 23.0%, P < 0.001), hospitalized (16.8% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.03), or on hemodialysis at time of transplant (2.6% vs. 8.2%, P < 0.001). Both recipient groups had similar perioperative mortality, 30-day readmission rates, and short-term patient survival. In the multivariate analysis, including recipient, donor, center and regional factors, donor age 70 years or older was associated with slightly increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.56; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The current trend toward the use of elderly donors in liver transplant recipients with low model of end-stage liver disease scores (<27), without hepatitis C, not hospitalized and not on dialysis, is associated with acceptable perioperative outcomes, patient survival, and slightly worse graft survival.

Successful Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the Presence of Multiple High-Titered Class I and II Antidonor HLA Antibodies.

The results of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants in highly sensitized recipients have been controversial in terms of antibody-mediated rejection and kidney allograft outcomes. This case report provides a detailed and sophisticated documentation of histocompatibility and pathologic data in a simultaneous liver-kidney transplant performed in a recipient with multiple high-titered class I and II antidonor HLA antibodies and a strongly positive cytotoxic crossmatch. Patient received induction with steroids, rituximab, and eculizumab without lymphocyte depleting agents. The kidney transplant was delayed by 6 hours after the liver transplant to allow more time to the liver allograft to "absorb" donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Interestingly, the liver allograft did not prevent immediate antibody-mediated injury to the kidney allograft in this highly sensitized recipient. Anti-HLA single antigen bead analysis of liver and kidney allograft biopsy eluates revealed deposition of both class I and II DSA in both liver and kidney transplants during the first 2 weeks after transplant. Afterward, both liver and kidney allograft functions improved and remained normal after a year with progressive reduction in serum DSA values.