Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Headache ; 61(2): 318-328, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502769

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patient-reported ideas and concerns about cluster headache, treatment options, and management strategies. BACKGROUND: Cluster headache patients experience severe pain and often suffer additional consequences from their disease. Patients have identified methods to cope with and combat cluster headache that are not widely known. METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed using deidentified data from the online Clusterbusters Medication Use survey, wherein 10 questions allowed for freely written comments. Using mixed-methods techniques, neurologists with expertise in headache medicine identified themes from these comments. Subgroup analysis sought to identify variables associated with specific themes. RESULTS: Among 2274 free-text responses from 493 adult participants, 23 themes were identified. Themes commonly discussed in the literature included such topics as "nothing worked" (24.7%, 122/493), "side effects" (12.8%, 63/493), and difficulties with "access/cost" (2.4%, 12/493). Less widely recognized themes included the use of "illicit substances" (35.5%, 175/493) and "vitamins/supplements" (12.2%, 60/493) in disease management. Lesser-known themes included "coffee" (5.3%, 26/493) and "exercise/physical activity" (4.7%, 23/493). Using strict significance criteria, no subgroup was associated with any theme. Several poignant quotes highlighted patient thoughts and experiences. CONCLUSIONS: This mixed-methods analysis identified challenges endured by cluster headache patients, as well as a variety of patient-directed disease management approaches. The volunteered information spotlights pharmacological, physiological, and psychological aspects of cluster headache that warrant further exploratory and interventional investigation.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Headache ; 58(10): 1568-1578, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221765

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this secondary analysis of the Clusterbusters® Medication Use survey, the use, effectiveness, and tolerability of inhaled oxygen were investigated and compared with injectable sumatriptan. We also sought to understand the predictors of medication response. BACKGROUND: Inhaled oxygen is a mainstay abortive intervention in cluster headache but is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unlike injectable sumatriptan, the only FDA-approved pharmacologic intervention for cluster headache, oxygen can be used multiple times a day, which is highly relevant for a condition with numerous daily attacks. In addition to obstacles in obtaining oxygen therapy, optimal oxygen delivery (ie, mask, flow rate) is not uniformly employed in cluster headache. These factors lead to underuse and imprecise therapeutic response rates. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using deidentified data from the Clusterbusters® Medication Use survey, which was modeled after previously published surveys and available online. Subjects were recruited from headache clinics and cluster headache websites. Most responses were chosen from a list; others were free-texted. The final analysis included responses from 493 adult participants with a validated diagnosis of cluster headache. This analysis of deidentified data from the Clusterbusters® Medication Use survey received institutional approval. RESULTS: The most commonly used delivery system used by subjects was a non-rebreather-type mask. The use of oxygen flow rates >10 L/min was a positive predictor of medication response (OR = 2.36, P = .016). Among those who used flow rates >10 L/min, both inhaled oxygen (81.5%) and injectable sumatriptan (80.5%) were efficacious and did not differ significantly from each other in any specific group examined. At flow rates >10 L/min, positive predictors of oxygen response were male gender (OR = 2.07, P = .031) and cigarette smoking (current or historical; OR = 2.25, P = .017). Among the groups examined, there were no predictors of sumatriptan response. Most comments about side effects and concerns were directed at triptans. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic response to inhaled oxygen at sufficiently high flow rates (>10 L/min) had comparable efficacy to that of injectable sumatriptan for the acute treatment of cluster headache. Other factors in oxygen delivery (ie, flow rate changes) should be explored for optimization of therapy. The reasons for improved oxygen response in males and those with a cigarette smoking history require further exploration. While both oxygen and sumatriptan can be effective in the management of cluster headache, patient-reported side effects and concerns were more commonly directed at triptan medications. Current restrictions on access to inhaled oxygen, which exist at many levels, limit the therapeutic options available for patients with cluster headache, thereby doing a disservice to this patient population and the providers who deliver their care.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica/terapia , Oxigenoterapia , Sumatriptana/uso terapêutico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Histamínica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigenoterapia/efeitos adversos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Fumar/epidemiologia , Sumatriptana/administração & dosagem , Sumatriptana/efeitos adversos , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 47(5): 372-81, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26595349

RESUMO

Cluster headache is one of the most debilitating pain syndromes. A significant number of patients are refractory to conventional therapies. The Clusterbusters.org medication use survey sought to characterize the effects of both conventional and alternative medications used in cluster headache. Participants were recruited from cluster headache websites and headache clinics. The final analysis included responses from 496 participants. The survey was modeled after previously published surveys and was available online. Most responses were chosen from a list, though others were free-texted. Conventional abortive and preventative medications were identified and their efficacies agreed with those previously published. The indoleamine hallucinogens, psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, and lysergic acid amide, were comparable to or more efficacious than most conventional medications. These agents were also perceived to shorten/abort a cluster period and bring chronic cluster headache into remission more so than conventional medications. Furthermore, infrequent and non-hallucinogenic doses were reported to be efficacious. Findings provide additional evidence that several indoleamine hallucinogens are rated as effective in treating cluster headache. These data reinforce the need for further investigation of the effects of these and related compounds in cluster headache under experimentally controlled settings.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica/tratamento farmacológico , Alucinógenos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Dietilamida do Ácido Lisérgico/efeitos adversos , Dietilamida do Ácido Lisérgico/análogos & derivados , Dietilamida do Ácido Lisérgico/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psilocibina/efeitos adversos , Psilocibina/uso terapêutico
4.
Subst Use Misuse ; 42(14): 2159-71, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18097997

RESUMO

In the United States, a variety of programs have been developed to prevent substance use among youth. These programs often target youth directly, and may also have components that address the relational influence of families, schools, and communities. We discuss clustering of youth marijuana use within and between households and neighborhoods. As often discussed in the literature, we consider analyzing "components of variance" in a hierarchical sample design with two or more levels. With a continuous outcome variable, the estimated relative size of variance components at each level can be interpreted as its relative "importance." We estimate variance components when the outcome is dichotomous, and find that for the use of marijuana in the past year, the role of the individual (individual adolescent vs. role of household vs. role of neighborhood) is quite prominent (79% of variation). A similar result is observed for the continuous scale variable of individual positive attitudes toward drug use (83%). For continuous constructs related to either household (parental monitoring) or neighborhood (neighborhood disorganization) the majority of variation still occurs at the individual level (67% and 51%, respectively), although they reveal significant percent variation (about 30%) at the corresponding family or neighborhood levels as well. We discuss the use of variance component methodology and the relevance for prevention programs.


Assuntos
Família , Características de Residência , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/etiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Fumar Maconha , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA