Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(2)2024 Jan 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38255945

RESUMO

The determination of the soybean branch number plays a pivotal role in plant morphogenesis and yield components. This polygenic trait is subject to environmental influences, and despite its significance, the genetic mechanisms governing the soybean branching number remain incompletely understood. To unravel these mechanisms, we conducted a comprehensive investigation employing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and bulked sample analysis (BSA). The GWAS revealed 18 SNPs associated with the soybean branch number, among which qGBN3 on chromosome 2 emerged as a consistently detected locus across two years, utilizing different models. In parallel, a BSA was executed using an F2 population derived from contrasting cultivars, Wandou35 (low branching number) and Ruidou1 (high branching number). The BSA results pinpointed a significant quantitative trait locus (QTL), designated as qBBN1, located on chromosome 2 by four distinct methods. Importantly, both the GWAS and BSA methods concurred in co-locating qGBN3 and qBBN1. In the co-located region, 15 candidate genes were identified. Through gene annotation and RT-qPCR analysis, we predicted that Glyma.02G125200 and Glyma.02G125600 are candidate genes regulating the soybean branch number. These findings significantly enhance our comprehension of the genetic intricacies regulating the branch number in soybeans, offering promising candidate genes and materials for subsequent investigations aimed at augmenting the soybean yield. This research represents a crucial step toward unlocking the full potential of soybean cultivation through targeted genetic interventions.


Assuntos
Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Glycine max , Humanos , Glycine max/genética , Cromossomos Humanos Par 2 , Engenharia Genética , Anotação de Sequência Molecular
2.
Int J Artif Organs ; 34(4): 339-47, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21534244

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the combination of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) with hemoperfusion (HP) could improve the clearance rate of middle and large molecule uremic toxins so as to improve the quality of life of MHD patients and reduce their mortality rate. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. 100 MHD patients were selected and then randomly divided into two groups after four weeks of run-in period. Group 1 received HD alone 2 times a week and the combined treatment of HD with HP (HD+HP) once a week, whereas Group 2 was given HD alone 3 times a week. This study was followed up for a mean of 2 years. The primary outcome was the death of patients. Secondary end points included normal clinical data, leptin, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), ß(2) microglobulin (ß(2)-MG), immunoreactive parathyroid hormone (iPTH), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and the index of dimensions of Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 Chinese Edition ). RESULTS: At the end of the two-year observation, the serum concentration of leptin, hsCRP, iPTH, IL-6, ß(2)-MG and TNF-α, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), cardiothoracic ratio, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), the EPO doses and the types of antihypertensive drugs used were lower with Group 1 than with Group 2 (p<0.05); Group 1 had higher hemoglobin (Hb), ejection fraction (EF), and body mass index (BMI) (p<0.05). No statistical difference between the two groups was observed in terms of serum albumin, serum iron (SI), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), cardiac output (CO), Kt/V, early/atrial mitral inflow velocities (E/A) (p>0.05). Besides, the SF-36 indicated that the total score of overall dimentions of Group 1 was higher than Group 2 (p<0.05) and the quality of life of Group 1 was evidently better than Group 2. The Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves for the 2-year observation period showed that patients in Group 1 had obvious survival advantage while Log-rank test results showed p<0.05. No serious adverse incidents occurred during the HD+HP treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HD+HP was superior to HD in regularly eliminating middle and large molecule uremic toxins accumulated in the body. These findings suggest a potential role for HD+HP in the treatment to improve the quality of life and survival rate of MHD patients.


Assuntos
Hemoperfusão/instrumentação , Nefropatias/terapia , Rins Artificiais , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Uremia/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/sangue , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pressão Sanguínea , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , China , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Hemoperfusão/efeitos adversos , Hemoperfusão/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Nefropatias/sangue , Nefropatias/mortalidade , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Uremia/sangue , Uremia/mortalidade , Uremia/fisiopatologia , Uremia/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA