Modified versus three-level technique of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm: a retrospective, case-controlled study.

Objectives: The modified three-level technique for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) has proven beneficial in the treatment of adrenal lesions in patients with BMI≥25 Kg/m2. This paper aims to summarize our institution's seven-year experience using this technique for all patients with Adrenal Lesions ≤ 6cm. Patients and methods: Between January 2016 and December 2022. The patients underwent laparoscopic adrenal surgery were categorized into Zhang's technique (ZT) (Three-level Technique) group and modified technique (MT) group. The fundamental characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: In total, 731 patients were stratified into two groups: ZT (n=448) and MT (n=283). Statistically significant distinctions were not detected between the two groups regarding sex, BMI, tumor location, tumor size, tumor type, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p>0.05). The MT group demonstrated superior outcomes compared to the ZT group in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, diet recovery time, complication rates, and postoperative hospitalization duration (p<0.05). 17 (4.34%) in the ZT group required unplanned adrenalectomy, while there was none in MT group (P<0.05). Conclusion: MT retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy has demonstrated its benefits in the treatment of adrenal lesions across all patients with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm, serving as a valuable point of reference for the surgical management of adrenal diseases. Patient summary: We have made modifications to the classic retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy and achieved superior surgical outcomes, resulting in a procedure known as modified retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This technique is suitable for both obese individuals and the general population with adrenal lesions ≤ 6cm.

Applicability of 14 Formulas for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in the Evaluation of Renal Function before and after Nephron-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Renal Tumors.

To compare the applicability of 14 equations of estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal function assessment of patients with renal tumors. Preoperative and postoperative GFR is measured by emission computed tomography (ECT) with 99mTc-DTPA as an imaging agent as reference GFR (rGFR) to compare with all formulas. Spearman correlation analysis and Bland-Altman agreement analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between rGFR and eGFR1 to 14 before and after surgery. A total of 50 cases including 22 males and 28 females were included. The results of preoperative eGFR1-14 correlated with rGFR (P < 0.05). The calculation results of all estimation formulas have a significant correlation with preoperative GFR. Preoperative MDRD-I, CKD-EPI SCysC, and FAS Scr-SCysC have good consistency. The CG formula has the highest precision and FAS Scr-SCysC has the highest accuracy. A total of 30 patients followed up after surgery, and postoperative rGFR correlated with CG, CKD-EPI, FAS, and BIS formulas (P < 0.05). But postoperative rGFR has no significant correlation with MDRD and Schwartz (P > 0.05). Postoperative CKD-EPI Scr-SCysC has best consistency, and FAS Scr-SCysC has the highest accuracy and precision. Our data suggest that eGFR equations evaluated by both serum creatinine (Scr) and cystatin C (SCysC) is not necessarily better than those evaluated by one of them alone. Among all enrolled equations, FAS Scr-SCysC is the best one to evaluate postoperative GFR in patients with renal tumors.