Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry in healthy labouring women: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM® ) baseline parameters in labouring women at term gestation. The secondary aim was to compare these reference ranges with those from previous studies on labouring women and from the manufacturer. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy women in labour. METHODS: Ethics approval was granted for an opt-out recruitment approach. ROTEM® testing was performed in labouring women at term gestation. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. ROTEM® Delta reference ranges were derived by calculating the 2.5% and 97.5% centiles for INTEM/EXTEM/FIBTEM parameters including amplitude at 5 minutes (A5), coagulation time (CT) and maximum clot firmness (MCF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ROTEM® parameters were measured in labouring women before delivery. The following tests were performed: FIBTEM, EXTEM and INTEM. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one women met the inclusion criteria, with a mean (± SD) age of 29.6 ± 5.4 years and median (interquartile range) gestation of 39.4 weeks (37.4-40.4 weeks). Seventy-five (62.0%) women were nulliparous and 71 (58.7%) delivered vaginally. The median and interquartile ranges for selected ROTEM® parameters were: FIBTEM A5, 21 mm (IQR 18-23 mm); EXTEM A5, 55 mm (52-58 mm); and EXTEM CT, 52 seconds (48-56 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: The FIBTEM/EXTEM/INTEM amplitudes were higher than the manufacturer's reference ranges for non-obstetric patients. The FIBTEM MCF upper and lower limits were higher and the EXTEM/INTEM CT was shorter and narrower in range. This study provides reference ranges for ROTEM® values in healthy labouring women at term gestation with uncomplicated pregnancies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This is the first study to report on ROTEM® reference ranges with over 120 healthy labouring women of normal weight at term gestation.

Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in healthy pregnant Australian women: a comparison of labouring and non-labouring women at term.

BACKGROUND: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) is a point-of-care coagulation test. Reference ranges in non-labouring women have recently been established from a cohort of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery using the recommended minimum sample size of 120. This study aimed to present baseline parameters for labouring and non-labouring women and to compare the mean values of these ROTEM® parameters. METHODS: Ethical approval was granted for an opt-out recruitment approach for labouring women and written consent was obtained from non-labouring women (data published previously). ROTEM® testing was performed in these two cohorts at term gestation. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. ROTEM® Delta reference ranges were derived by calculating the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles for INTEM/EXTEM/FIBTEM amplitude at 5 min (A5), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and clot formation time (CFT). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one labouring and 132 non-labouring women met inclusion criteria. The mean values for selected ROTEM® parameters for labouring and non-labouring women respectively were: FIBTEM A5, 21.05 and 19.7 mm (P=0.008); EXTEM A5, 54.8 and 53.2 mm (P=0.025); and EXTEM CT, 52.2 and 53.7 s (P=0.049). Significant differences between the groups were observed in measures of clotting onset and clot firmness. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant decrease in the mean time-to-clotting onset in labouring women compared with non-labouring women. Mean values for measures of clot firmness were greater in labouring women. In comparison to previously established ROTEM® baseline parameters for non-labouring women, this study provides evidence that there is greater hyper-coagulability in labouring women.

Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in healthy women undergoing elective caesarean delivery: a prospective observational study in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Formal reference ranges for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in pregnancy have not been obtained in the recommended minimum sample size of 120. This prospective observational study aimed to establish baseline parameters in an Australian population of women undergoing elective caesarean delivery. The secondary aim was to compare these reference ranges with those from prior studies and the manufacturer. METHODS: Women undergoing elective caesarean delivery at term were included if they were at term, of normal body mass index and had no conditions affecting coagulation. ROTEM® reference ranges were derived by calculating the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles for INTEM/EXTEM/FIBTEM amplitude at 5 minutes (A5), amplitude at 15 minutes (A15), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF), and clot formation time (CFT). RESULTS: Of 202 women screened, 132 met the inclusion criteria, having a mean age of 32.7 ±â€¯5.0 years and median body mass index of 23.8 kg/m2 (interquartile range 21.5-26.4). The reference ranges for selected ROTEM® parameters were as follows: FIBTEM A5 (13-28 mm), FIBTEM CT (40-74 s), FIBTEM MCF (16-34 mm), EXTEM A5 (39-66 mm), EXTEM CT (43-69 s), INTEM A5 (38-63 mm). CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM® reference ranges for women with uncomplicated term pregnancies were reported as per the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. The FIBTEM MCF and FIBTEM/EXTEM/INTEM amplitudes were higher in comparison to the manufacturer's reference ranges for the non-obstetric population. The EXTEM CT was shorter than the non-obstetric reference ranges. These ranges show an increase in coagulability during normal pregnancy compared to the non-pregnant reference ranges.

Acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: a systematic review of published predictive models.

Acute kidney injury is a frequent postoperative complication amongst liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This systematic review analysed the existing predictive models, in order to solidify current understanding. Articles were selected for inclusion if they described the primary development of a clinical prediction model (either an algorithm or risk score) to predict AKI post liver transplantation. The database search yielded a total of seven studies describing the primary development of a prediction model or risk score for the development of AKI following liver transplantation. The models span thirteen years of clinical research and highlight a gradual change in the definitions of AKI, emphasising the need to employ standardised definitions for subsequent studies. Collectively, the models identify a diverse range of predictive factors with several common trends. They emphasise the impact of preoperative renal dysfunction, liver disease severity and aetiology, metabolic risk factors as well as intraoperative variables including measures of haemodynamic instability and graft quality. Although several of the models address postoperative parameters, their utility in predictive modelling seems to be of questionable relevance. The common risk factors identified within this systematic review provide a minimum list of variables, which future studies should address. Research in this area would benefit from prospective, multi-site studies with larger cohorts as well as the subsequent internal and external validation of predictive models. Ultimately, the ability to identify patients at high risk of post-transplant AKI may enable early intervention and perhaps prevention.

Evaluation of perioperative predictors of acute kidney injury post orthotopic liver transplantation.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following orthotopic liver transplantation. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as increased healthcare costs. The aetiology of AKI post liver transplantation is multifactorial and understanding these factors is pivotal in developing risk stratification and prevention strategies. This study aims to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative factors that may be associated with AKI in patients undergoing liver transplantation at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland. In our study, retrospective data of 97 consecutive orthotopic liver transplantations performed between January 2009 and August 2012 were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for the development of AKI in this cohort. In the cohort of 97 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, 24 patients (25%) developed postoperative AKI. Univariate analysis demonstrated that high preoperative body mass index and intraoperative noradrenaline use were both associated with AKI. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high body mass index, high Model for End-stage Liver Disease score and intraoperative noradrenaline use were associated with AKI. Overall mortaility was 4.1% during the study period and was not significantly different between the two groups. The high incidence of AKI following liver transplantation in this study cohort highlights the importance of this issue. This study has identified several potential pre- and intraoperative risk factors, providing a focus for patient surveillance and future research.