RESUMO
Genetic variants in GJB2 are the most frequent cause of congenital and childhood hearing loss worldwide. The purpose of this study was to delineate the genetic and phenotypic landscape of GJB2 SNV variants. All possible single-nucleotide substitution variants of the coding region of GJB2 (N = 2043) were manually curated following the ACMG/AMP hearing loss guidelines. As a result, 60 (2.9%), 177 (8.7%), 1499 (73.4%), 301 (14.7%) and 6 (0.3%) of the variants were classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign, respectively. 53% (84/158) of the pathogenic/likely pathogenic missense variants were not present in ClinVar. The second transmembrane domain and the 310 helix were highly enriched for pathogenic missense variants, while the intracellular loops were tolerant to variation. The N-terminal tail and the extracellular loop showed high clustering of variants that are associated with syndromic or dominant non-syndromic hearing loss. In conclusion, our study interpreted all possible single-nucleotide substitution coding variants, characterized novel clinically significant variants in GJB2, and revealed significant genotype-phenotype correlations at this common hearing loss locus. Our work provides a prototype for other genes with similarly high genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity.
Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva , Humanos , Conexinas/genética , Conexina 26/genética , Perda Auditiva/genética , Surdez/genética , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , MutaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Deafness, autosomal recessive 16 (DFNB16) is caused by compound heterozygous or homozygous variants in STRC and is the second most common form of genetic hearing loss. Due to the nearly identical sequences of STRC and the pseudogene STRCP1, analysis of this region is challenging in clinical testing. METHODS: We developed a method that accurately identifies the copy number of STRC and STRCP1 using standard short-read genome sequencing. Then, we used whole genome sequencing (WGS) data to investigate the population distribution of STRC copy number in 6813 neonates and the correlation between STRC and STRCP1 copy number. RESULTS: The comparison of WGS results with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification demonstrated high sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 97.5%-100%) and specificity (98.8%; 95% CI, 97.7%-99.5%) in detecting heterozygous deletion of STRC from short-read genome sequencing data. The population analysis revealed that 5.22% of the general population has STRC copy number changes, almost half of which (2.33%; 95% CI, 1.99%-2.72%) were clinically significant, including heterozygous and homozygous STRC deletions. There was a strong inverse correlation between STRC and STRCP1 copy number. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel and reliable method to determine STRC copy number based on standard short-read based WGS data. Incorporating this method into analytic pipelines would improve the clinical utility of WGS in the screening and diagnosis of hearing loss. Finally, we provide population-based evidence of pseudogene-mediated gene conversions between STRC and STRCP1.
Assuntos
Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Perda Auditiva , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/genética , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/genética , Sequência de Bases , Homozigoto , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intercelular/genéticaRESUMO
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) have proposed a set of evidence-based guidelines to support sequence variant interpretation. The ClinGen hearing loss expert panel (HL-EP) introduced further specifications into the ACMG/AMP framework for genetic hearing loss. This study developed a tool named Variant Interpretation Platform for genetic Hearing Loss (VIP-HL), aiming to semi-automate the HL ACMG/AMP rules. VIP-HL aggregates information from external databases to automate 13 out of 24 ACMG/AMP rules specified by HL-EP, namely PVS1, PS1, PM1, PM2, PM4, PM5, PP3, BA1, BS1, BS2, BP3, BP4, and BP7. We benchmarked VIP-HL using 50 variants in which 82 rules were activated by the ClinGen HL-EP. VIP-HL concordantly activated 93% (76/82) rules, significantly higher than that of by InterVar (48%; 39/82). VIP-HL is an integrated online tool for reliable automated variant classification in hearing loss genes. It assists curators in variant interpretation and provides a platform for users to share classifications with each other. VIP-HL is available with a user-friendly web interface at http://hearing.genetics.bgi.com/.
Assuntos
Genoma Humano , Perda Auditiva , Humanos , Testes Genéticos , Variação Genética , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/genética , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) presented technical standards for interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants in 2019 (the standards). Although ClinGen developed a web-based CNV classification calculator based on scoring metrics, it can only track and tally points that have been assigned based on observed evidence. Here, we developed AutoCNV (a semiautomatic automated CNV interpretation system) based on the standards, which can automatically generate predictions on 18 and 16 criteria for copy number loss and gain, respectively. RESULTS: We assessed the performance of AutoCNV using 72 CNVs evaluated by external independent reviewers and 20 illustrative case examples. Using AutoCNV, it showed that 100 % (72/72) and 95 % (19/20) of CNVs were consistent with the reviewers' and ClinGen-verified classifications, respectively. AutoCNV only required an average of less than 5 milliseconds to obtain the result for one CNV with automated scoring. We also applied AutoCNV for the interpretation of CNVs from the ClinVar database and the dbVar database. We also developed a web-based version of AutoCNV (wAutoCNV). CONCLUSIONS: AutoCNV may serve to assist users in conducting in-depth CNV interpretation, to accelerate and facilitate the interpretation process of CNVs and to improve the consistency and reliability of CNV interpretation.
Assuntos
Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Genômica , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Genomic disorders caused by pathogenic copy number variation (pCNV) have proven to underlie a significant proportion of birth defects. With technological advance, improvement of bioinformatics analysis procedure, and accumulation of clinical data, non-invasive prenatal screening of pCNV (NIPS-pCNV) by high-throughput sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA has been put to use in clinical settings. Specialized standards for clinical application of NIPS-pCNV are required. Based on the discussion, 10 pCNV-associated diseases with well-defined conditions and 5 common chromosomal aneuploidy syndromes are recommended as the target of screening in this consensus. Meanwhile, a standardized procedure for NIPS-pCNV is also provided, which may facilitate propagation of this technique in clinical settings.
Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Aneuploidia , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/genética , Consenso , Feminino , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-NatalRESUMO
Null variants are prevalent within the human genome, and their accurate interpretation is critical for clinical management. In 2018, the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Group refined the only criterion with a very strong pathogenicity rating (PVS1). To streamline PVS1 interpretation, we have developed an automatic classification tool with a graphical user interface called AutoPVS1. The performance of AutoPVS1 was assessed using 56 variants manually curated by the ClinGen's SVI Working Group; it achieved an interpretation concordance of 93% (52/56). A further analysis of 28,586 putative loss-of-function variants by AutoPVS1 demonstrated that at least 27.7% of them do not reach a very strong strength level, 17.5% because of variant-specific issues and 10.2% due to disease mechanism considerations. Notably, 41.0% (1,936/4,717) of splicing variants were assigned a decreased preliminary PVS1 strength level, a significantly greater fraction than in frameshift variants (13.2%) and nonsense variants (10.8%). Our results reinforce the necessity of considering variant-specific issues and disease mechanisms in variant interpretation and demonstrate that AutoPVS1 meets an urgent need by enabling biocurators to easily assign accurate, reliable and reproducible PVS1 strength levels in the process of variant interpretation. AutoPVS1 is publicly available at http://autopvs1.genetics.bgi.com/.
Assuntos
Genômica/métodos , Mutação com Perda de Função , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Genoma Humano , Humanos , Software , Interface Usuário-ComputadorRESUMO
Newborn hearing screening is not designed to detect delayed-onset prelingual hearing loss or aminoglycoside-antibiotic-induced ototoxicity. Cases with severe to profound hearing loss have been reported to have been missed by newborn hearing screens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent hearing and genetic screening in the general population and demonstrate its benefits in practice. Enrolled newborns received concurrent hearing and genetic screens between September 1, 2015 and January 31, 2018. Of the 239,636 eligible infants (median age, 19 months), 548 (0.23%) had prelingual hearing loss. Genetic screening identified 14 hearing loss patients with positive genotypes and 27 patients with inconclusive genotypes who had passed the hearing screens. In addition, the genetic screen identified 0.23% (570/239,636) of the newborns and their family members as at-risk for ototoxicity, which is undetectable by hearing screens. In conclusion, genetic screening complements newborn hearing screening by improving the detection of infants at risk of hereditary hearing loss and ototoxicity, and by informing genotype-based clinical management for affected infants and their family members. Our findings suggest that the practice should be further validated in other populations and rigorous cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Perda Auditiva , Triagem Neonatal , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/genética , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The benefits of concurrent newborn hearing and genetic screening have not been statistically proven due to limited sample sizes and outcome data. To fill this gap, we analyzed outcomes of newborns with genetic screening results. METHODS: Newborns in China were screened for 20 hearing-loss-related genetic variants from 2012 to 2017. Genetic results were categorized as positive, at-risk, inconclusive, or negative. Hearing screening results, risk factors, and up-to-date hearing status were followed up via phone interviews. RESULTS: Following up 12,778 of 1.2 million genetically screened newborns revealed a higher rate of hearing loss by three months of age among referrals from the initial hearing screening (60% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of lost-to-follow-up/documentation (5% vs. 22%, P < 0.001) in the positive group than in the inconclusive group. Importantly, genetic screening detected 13% more hearing-impaired infants than hearing screening alone and identified 2,638 (0.23% of total) newborns predisposed to preventable ototoxicity undetectable by hearing screening. CONCLUSION: Incorporating genetic screening improves the effectiveness of newborn hearing screening programs by elucidating etiologies, discerning high-risk subgroups for vigilant management, identifying additional children who may benefit from early intervention, and informing at-risk newborns and their maternal relatives of increased susceptibility to ototoxicity.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/métodos , Perda Auditiva/genética , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , China/epidemiologia , Surdez/genética , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos/tendências , Genética Populacional , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal/tendênciasRESUMO
The fast degradation of the charge-extraction interface at indium tin oxide (ITO) poses a significant obstacle to achieving long-term stability for organic solar cells (OSCs). Herein, a sustainable approach for recycling non-sustainable indium to construct efficient and stable OSCs and scale-up modules is developed. It is revealed that the recovered indium chloride (InCl3 ) from indium oxide waste can be applied as an effective hole-selective interfacial layer for the ITO electrode (noted as InCl3 -ITO anode) through simple aqueous fabrication, facilitating not only energy level alignment to photoactive blends but also mitigating parasitic absorption and charge recombination losses of the corresponding OSCs. As a result, OSCs and modules consisting of InCl3 -ITO anodes achieve remarkable power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 18.92% and 15.20% (active area of 18.73 cm2 ), respectively. More importantly, the InCl3 -ITO anode can significantly extend the thermal stability of derived OSCs, with an extrapolated T80 lifetime of ≈10 000 h.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing identifies several rare autosomal trisomies in the general obstetrical population, but its use is questioned by its low positive predictive value. Furthermore, the origin of rare autosomal trisomies and the clinical effect of reporting them has not been sufficiently investigated. In addition, professional societies express their need for data assessing the clinical use of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing for rare autosomal trisomies for years. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the origin of rare autosomal trisomies and the clinical effect of disclosing rare autosomal trisomies in clinical settings. STUDY DESIGN: Women who received noninvasive prenatal testing between March 2021 and March 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Clinical follow-up and cytogenetic and molecular investigations were performed. Posthoc analysis was performed to investigate the association between placental mosaicism and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 154 rare autosomal trisomies were identified in 89,242 pregnancies (0.17%) through noninvasive prenatal testing. In the 120 cases in which cytogenetic and molecular investigations were carried out, the rare autosomal trisomies were found to originate from true fetal mosaicism (n=5), uniparental disomy (n=5), maternal mosaic trisomy (n=3), maternal malignancy (n=1), and confined placental mosaicism (n=106). Clinical follow-up showed that 40% of all rare autosomal trisomy cases had adverse perinatal outcomes. In women with false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing results originating from confined placental mosaicism, the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes was 26%. More importantly, the placental mosaicism ratio revealed by noninvasive prenatal testing was significantly higher in women who experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those who did not (0.688 vs 0.332; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Women with noninvasive prenatal testing results indicative of rare autosomal trisomies are at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and that risk can be stratified using chromosomes and the mosaicism ratio revealed by noninvasive prenatal testing. Our data are valuable for obstetrical caregivers advising a patient with a noninvasive prenatal testing result indicative of a rare autosomal trisomy and a false-positive diagnosis and for managing risks during pregnancy.
Assuntos
Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Trissomia , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Trissomia/diagnóstico , Trissomia/genética , Trissomia/patologia , Placenta/patologia , Mosaicismo , CromossomosRESUMO
Importance: Newborn screening via biochemical tests is in use worldwide. The availability of genetic sequencing has allowed rapid screening for a substantial number of monogenic disorders. However, the outcomes of this strategy have not been evaluated in a general newborn population. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of applying gene panel sequencing as a first-tier newborn screening test. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included newborns who were prospectively recruited from 8 screening centers in China between February 21 and December 31, 2021. Neonates with positive results were followed up before July 5, 2022. Exposures: All participants were concurrently screened using dried blood spots. The screen consisted of biochemical screening tests and a targeted gene panel sequencing test for 128 conditions. The biochemical and genomic tests could both detect 43 of the conditions, whereas the other 85 conditions were screened solely by the gene panel. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the number of patients detected by gene panel sequencing but undetected by the biochemical test. Results: This study prospectively recruited 29â¯601 newborns (15â¯357 [51.2%] male). The mean (SD) gestational age was 39.0 (1.5) weeks, and the mean (SD) birth weight was 3273 (457) g. The gene panel sequencing screened 813 infants (2.7%; 95% CI, 2.6%-2.9%) as positive. By the date of follow-up, 402 infants (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%) had been diagnosed, indicating the positive predictive value was 50.4% (95% CI, 50.0%-53.9%). The gene panel sequencing identified 59 patients undetected by biochemical tests, including 20 patients affected by biochemically and genetically screened disorders and 39 patients affected by solely genetically screened disorders, which translates into 1 out of every 500 newborns (95% CI, 1/385-1/625) benefiting from the implementation of gene panels as a first-tier screening test. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the use of gene panel sequencing in a general newborn population as a first-tier screening test improved the detection capability of traditional screening, providing an evidence-based suggestion that it could be considered as a crucial method for first-tier screening.
Assuntos
Genômica , Triagem Neonatal , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos de Coortes , Peso ao Nascer , ChinaRESUMO
To improve the etiological diagnosis of congenital hearing loss by combining whole-exome sequencing (WES) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing and to explore the potential benefits of adding CMV screening to newborn hearing screening, 80 children under 2 years of age with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. Peripheral venous blood was extracted from the children for WES analysis. Saliva after mouthwash and the first urine in the morning were collected and used as samples to quantify CMV DNA copy number in urine and saliva by qPCR; among the 80 children with congenital deafness, 59 (74%) were found to have genetic variants that may cause congenital deafness, including 44 with GJB2 or SLC26A4 gene variant, 1 with STRC gene variant, and 14 with other genetic variants. A total of 12 children carried deafness gene variants associated with a syndrome; CMV test results showed that in two children, the CMV DNA copy number in saliva was >1000/mL, which indicates that they were CMV-positive, and their genetic test results were negative. A neonatal CMV test combined with genetic screening can improve the etiological diagnosis rate of congenital deafness, and the direct evidence of neonatal CMV infection deserves further verification.
RESUMO
Background: Hearing loss affects approximately two out of every 1,000 newborns. Genetic factors and congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections account for around 90% of the etiology. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a whole genome sequencing (WGS) approach to detect deafness-related genetic variants and CMV infections simultaneously in newborns. Method: Deafness-related genes causing congenital or childhood hearing loss were curated and selected for newborn screening. Nine dried blood spots from newborns with known genetic variants (n = 6) or CMV infections (n = 3) were employed to develop and validate the WGS testing and analytic pipeline. We then pilot tested the WGS analysis on 51 de-identified clinical samples. Results: 92 gene-disease pairs were selected for screening hearing loss in newborns. In the validation test, WGS accurately detected all types of genetic variants, including single nucleotide variations, insertions/deletions, and copy number variations in the nuclear or mitochondrial genome. Sequence reads mapping to the CMV reference genome were discovered in CMV infected samples. In the pilot test, WGS identified nine out of 51 (18%) newborns carrying pathogenic variants associated with deafness. Conclusion: WGS can simultaneously detect genetic variants and CMV infections in dried blood spot specimens from newborns. Our study provides proof of principle that genome sequencing can be a promising alternative for newborn screening of hearing loss.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Genetic testing is widely used in diagnosing genetic hearing loss in patients. Other than providing genetic etiology, the benefits of genetic testing in pediatric patients with hearing loss are less investigated. METHODS: From 2018-2020, pediatric patients who initially presented isolated hearing loss were enrolled. Comprehensive genetic testing, including GJB2/SLC26A4 multiplex amplicon sequencing, STRC/OTOA copy number variation analysis, and exome sequencing, were hierarchically offered. Clinical follow-up and examinations were performed. RESULTS: A total of 80 pediatric patients who initially presented isolated hearing loss were considered as nonsyndromic hearing loss and enrolled in this study. The definitive diagnosis yield was 66% (53/80) and the likely diagnosis yield was 8% (6/80) through comprehensive genetic testing. With the aid of genetic testing and further clinical follow-up and examinations, the clinical diagnoses and medical management were altered in eleven patients (19%, 11/59); five were syndromic hearing loss; six were nonsyndromic hearing loss mimics. CONCLUSION: Syndromic hearing loss and nonsyndromic hearing loss mimics are common in pediatric patients who initially present with isolated hearing loss. The comprehensive genetic testing provides not only a high diagnostic yield but also valuable information for clinicians to uncover subclinical or pre-symptomatic phenotypes, which allows early diagnosis of SHL, and leads to precise genetic counseling and changes the medical management.
Assuntos
Surdez , Perda Auditiva , Criança , Conexina 26/genética , Conexinas/genética , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Surdez/genética , Testes Genéticos , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/genética , Humanos , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intercelular/genética , MutaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the testing of blood samples from pregnant women to screen for fetal risk of chromosomal disorders. Even though in vitro hemolysis of blood specimens is common in clinical laboratories, its influence on NIPT has not been well investigated. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 205 pregnant women and categorized according to the concentration of free hemoglobin in the plasma. After performing NIPT using massively parallel sequencing, the quality control metrics were analyzed and compared with samples that did not undergo hemolysis or samples redrawn from the same women. RESULTS: The specimens were divided into four groups based on the concentration of free hemoglobin: Group I (0-1 g/L, n = 53), Group II (1-2 g/L, n = 97), Group III (2-4 g/L, n = 30), and Group IV (> 4 g/L, n = 25). There was no significant difference in the quality control metrics of clinical samples with slight or moderate hemolysis (Group II and III). However, samples with severe hemolysis (Group IV) showed a significantly increased rate of duplicated reads (duplication rate) and fetal fraction, as well as decreased library concentration compared with samples without hemolysis. Moreover, the increase in fetal fraction caused by hemolysis was confirmed by redrawing blood samples in Group IV. CONCLUSION: For NIPT using massively parallel sequencing, samples with slight or moderate hemolysis (≤ 4 g/L) are acceptable. However, careful consideration should be taken regarding the use of severely hemolyzed samples (> 4 g/L), since they might increase the risk of test failure.
Assuntos
Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Benchmarking , Feminino , Hemoglobinas , Hemólise , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Controle de QualidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Congenital hearing loss is one of the most common birth defects. Early identification and management play a crucial role in improving patients' communication and language acquisition. Previous studies demonstrated that genetic screening complements newborn hearing screening in clinical settings. METHODS: We developed a multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay to sequence the full coding region of the GJB2 gene, the most pathogenic variants of the SLC26A4 gene, and hotspot variants in the MT-RNR1 gene. The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability were validated via samples with known genotypes. Finally, a pilot study was performed on 300 anonymous dried blood samples. RESULTS: Of 103 samples with known genotypes, the multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay accurately identified all the variants, demonstrating a 100% sensitivity and specificity. The consistency is high in the analysis of the test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. In the pilot study, 12.3% (37/300) of the newborns were found to carry at least one pathogenic variant, including 24, 10, and 3 from the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 gene, respectively. With an allele frequency of 2.2%, the NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.109G>A was the most prevalent variant in the study population. CONCLUSION: The multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay is an accurate and reliable test to detect hearing loss variants in the GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 genes. It can be used to screen genetic hearing loss in newborns.
Assuntos
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Testes Genéticos , Perda Auditiva/genética , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
Hearing loss is one of the most common birth disorders in humans, with an estimated prevalence of 1-3 in every 1000 newborns. This study investigates the molecular etiology of a hearing loss cohort using a stepwise strategy to effectively diagnose patients and address the challenges posed by the genetic heterogeneity and variable mutation spectrum of hearing loss. In order to target known pathogenic variants, multiplex PCR plus next-generation sequencing was applied in the first step; patients which did not receive a diagnosis from this were further referred for exome sequencing. A total of 92 unrelated patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss were enrolled in the study. In total, 64% (59/92) of the patients were molecularly diagnosed, 44 of them in the first step by multiplex PCR plus sequencing. Exome sequencing resulted in eleven diagnoses (23%, 11/48) and four probable diagnoses (8%, 4/48) among the 48 patients who were not diagnosed in the first step. The rate of secondary findings from exome sequencing in our cohort was 3% (2/58). This research presents a molecular diagnosis spectrum of 92 non-syndromic hearing loss patients and demonstrates the benefits of using a stepwise diagnostic approach in the genetic testing of nonsyndromic hearing loss.
Assuntos
Surdez/diagnóstico , Surdez/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Pré-Escolar , China , Feminino , Genótipo , Perda Auditiva/genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Mutação , Linhagem , Sequenciamento do Exoma/métodosRESUMO
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMO
High-frequency disease-causing alleles exist, but their number is rather small. This study aimed to interpret and reclassify common pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants in ClinVar and to identify indicators linked with reclassification. We analyzed P/LP variants without conflicting interpretations in ClinVar. Only variants with an allele frequency exceeding 0.5% in at least one ancestry in gnomAD were included. Variants were manually interpreted according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Of 326 variants retrieved, 217 variants in 173 genes were selected for curation. Overall, 87 (40%) variants were downgraded to benign, likely benign or variant of uncertain significance. Five variants (2%) were found to be more likely to be risk factors. Most of the reclassifications were of variants with a low rank, an older classification, a higher allele frequency, or which were collected through methods other than clinical testing. ClinVar provides a universal platform for users who intend to share the classification variants, resulting in the improved concordance of variant interpretation. P/LP variants with a high allele frequency should be used with caution. Ongoing improvements would further improve the practicability of ClinVar database.
Assuntos
Genômica/métodos , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Frequência do Gene , Testes Genéticos , Variação GenéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Congenital hearing loss affects approximately 1-2 infants out of every 1000, with 50% of the cases resulting from genetic factors. Targeted gene panels have been widely used for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss. This study aims to reveal new diagnoses via reanalyzing historical data of a multigene panel, and exam the reasons for new diagnoses. METHODS: A total of 210 samples were enlisted, including clinical reports and sequencing data of patients with congenital/prelingual hearing loss who were referred to clinical genetic testing from October 2014 to June 2017. All variants listed on the original clinical reports were reinterpreted according to the standards and guidelines recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP). Expanded analysis of raw data were performed in undiagnosed cases. RESULTS: Re-analysis resulted in nine new diagnoses, improving the overall diagnostic rate from 39 to 43%. New diagnoses were attributed to newly published clinical evidence in the literature, adoption of new interpretation guidelines and expanded analysis range. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates benefits of reanalysis of targeted gene panel data, indicating that periodical reanalysis should be performed in clinical practice.