B-cell capacity for expansion and differentiation into plasma cells are altered in osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibody (autoAbs) production in osteoarthritis (OA), coupled with evidence of disturbed B-cell homoeostasis, suggest a potential role for B-cells in OA. B-cells can differentiate with T-cell help (T-dep) or using alternative Toll like recptor (TLR) co-stimulation (TLR-dep). We analysed the capacity for differentiation of B-cells in OA versus age-matched healthy controls (HCs) and compared the capacity of OA synovitis-derived stromal cells to provide support for plasma cell (PC) maturation. METHODS: B-cells were isolated from OA and HC. Standardised in vitro models of B-cell differentiation were used comparing T-dep (CD40 (cluster of differentiation-40/BCR (B-cell receptor)-ligation) versus TLR-dep (TLR7/BCR-activation). Differentiation marker expression was analysed by flow-cytometry; antibody secretion (immunnoglobulins IgM/IgA/IgG) by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), gene expression by qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction). RESULTS: Compared to HC, circulating OA B-cells showed an overall more mature phenotype. The gene expression profile of synovial OA B-cells resembled that of PCs. Circulating B-cells differentiated under both TLR-dep and T-dep, however OA B-cells executed differentiation faster in terms of change in surface marker and secreted more antibody at Day 6, while resulting in similar PC numbers at Day 13, with an altered phenotype at Day 13 in OA. The main difference was reduced early B-cells expansion in OA (notably in TLR-dep) and reduced cell death. Stromal cells support from OA-synovitis allowed better PC survival compared to bone marrow, with an additional population of cells and higher Ig-secretion. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that OA B-cells present an altered capacity for proliferation and differentiation while remaining able to produce antibodies, notably in synovium. These findings may partly contribute to autoAbs development as recently observed in OA synovial fluids.

Anti-carbamylated protein antibodies: are they useful for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVES: ACR/EULAR-2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rely heavily on the presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA). The role of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) in this context is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the value of anti-CarP for RA classification in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Patients (n=402) were recruited from an early arthritis clinic and followed for 24 months. Healthy controls (n=95) were included. An anti-CarP ELISA was performed (aU/mL). Statistical analysis used regression and AUC analysis. RESULTS: The criteria for RA were met by 195/402 patients at inclusion; 28 developed RA during follow-up and 179 had other diagnosis (non-RA). 97/195 (49%) RA patients were anti-CarP+ (median 250 uA/mL [IQR 25-762]). In the group that progressed to RA, 7/28 (25%) were positive (82 uA/mL [13-235]) compared to non-RA (p=0.001) with 13/179 (7%) positive (26 uA/mL [5-80]). Being anti-CarP+ alone was observed in 17 patients of whom 7 (41%) were RA. Levels/positivity were not associated with other parameters. Anti-CarP+ had an odds ratio (OR) 6.5 for predicting RA (OR=17.1 for ACPA+ and OR=2.5 for RF+). In ACPA- patients, anti-CarP+ was also predictive of RA (OR=2.39). Being ACPA+/anti-CarP+/RF+ had a high predictive value for RA (OR=29.9 sensitivity/specificity (sen/spe) 33%/99%, positive/negative predictive values (ppv/npv) 97%/54%), however, being ACPA+/anti-CarP+ was superior (OR=36.1 sen/spe=41%/99%, ppv/npv=98%/57%) while being ACPA+/RF+ was inferior (OR=11.9, sen/spe=54%/95%, ppv/npv=94%/62%). CONCLUSIONS: For RA classification, anti-CarP+ was less sensitive than ACPA, but more specific than RF. Anti-CarP+ may prove useful, classifying early arthritis patients, notably ACPA- patients.

Added value of multiple autoantibody testing for predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis in at-risk individuals.

BACKGROUND: Predicting progression to clinical arthritis in individuals at-risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis is a prerequisite to developing stratification groups for prevention strategies. Selecting accurate predictive criteria is the critical step to define the population at-risk. While positivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) remains the main recruitment biomarker, positivity for other autoantibodies (AutoAbs) identified before the onset of symptoms, may provide additional predictive accuracy for stratification. OBJECTIVE: To perform a multiple AutoAbs analysis for both the prediction and the time of progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: 392 individuals were recruited based on a new musculoskeletal complaint and positivity for ACPA or rheumatoid factor (RF). ELISAs were performed for ACPA, RF, anti-nuclear Ab, anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-collagen AutoAbs. Logistic and COX regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: Progression to IA was observed in 125/392 (32%) of cases, of which 78 progressed within 12 months. The AutoAbs ACPA, RF, anti-CarP were individually associated with progression (p<0.0001) and improved prediction when combined with demographic/clinical data (Accuracy >77%; area under the curve (AUC) >0.789), compared with prediction using only demographic/clinical data (72.9%, AUC=0.760). Multiple AutoAbs testing provided added value, with +6.4% accuracy for number of positive AutoAbs (AUC=0.852); +5.4% accuracy for AutoAbs levels (ACPA/anti-CarP, AUC=0.832); and +6.2% accuracy for risk-groups based on high/low levels (ACPA/RF/anti-CarP, AUC=0.837). Time to imminent progression was best predicted using ACPA/anti-CarP levels (AUC=0.779), while the number of positive AutoAbs was/status/risk were as good (AUC=0.778). CONCLUSION: We confirm added value of multiple AutoAbs testing for identifying progressors to clinical disease, allowing more specific stratification for intervention studies.

B-cell capacity for differentiation changes with age.

BACKGROUND: Age-related immune deficiencies are thought to be responsible for increased susceptibility to infection in older adults, with alterations in lymphocyte populations becoming more prevalent over time. The loss of humoral immunity in ageing was attributed to the diminished numbers of B cells and the reduced ability to generate immunoglobulin. AIMS: To compare the intrinsic B-cell capacity for differentiation into mature plasma cells (PCs), between young and old donors, using in vitro assays, providing either effective T-cell help or activation via TLR engagement. METHODS: B cells were isolated from healthy individuals, in younger (30-38 years) and older (60-64 years) donors. An in vitro model system of B-cell differentiation was used, analysing 5 differentiation markers by flow cytometry, under T-dependent (TD: CD40/BCR stimulation) or T-independent (TI: TLR7/BCR activation) conditions. Antibody secretion was measured by ELISA and gene expression using qPCR. RESULTS: TI and TD differentiation resulted in effective proliferation of B cells followed by their differentiation into PC. B-cell-executed TI differentiation was faster, all differentiation marker and genes being expressed earlier than under TD differentiation (day 6), although generating less viable cells and lower antibody levels (day 13). Age-related differences in B-cell capacity for differentiation were minimal in TD differentiation. In contrast, in TI differentiation age significantly affected proliferation, viability, differentiation, antibody secretion and gene expression, older donors being more efficient. CONCLUSION: Altogether, B-cell differentiation into PC appeared similar between age groups when provided with T-cell help, in contrast to TI differentiation, where multiple age-related changes suggest better capacities in older donors. These new findings may help explain the emergence of autoantibodies in ageing.