Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical treatments, and oncological outcomes of localized primary unifocal urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinicopathological characteristics, surgical treatments, and oncological outcomes of patients with localized primary unifocal urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction (UC-UVJ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Localized primary unifocal UC-UVJ cases in patients admitted to our hospital from March 2013 to August 2021 were reviewed. Clinicopathological parameters, perioperative data, and oncological outcomes were compared between patients grouped by tumor location and surgical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients with localized primary unifocal UC-UVJ were enrolled in this study. These included 72 cases of bladder cancer (BC) involving the ureteral orifice, and 58 cases of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) involving the intramural ureter. The proportion of male patients, hydronephrosis, flank pain/abdominal pain, and tumor size differed significantly between the BC and UTUC groups (all P < 0.05). During the median follow-up period of 32.9 months, 49 cases (37.7%) recurred and 29 (22.3%) died from urothelial carcinoma (UC), though no statistical difference in recurrence (P = 0.436) or cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.653) was observed between the BC and UTUC groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified age, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS), and sex, T stage, tumor grade, and LVI as independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). CONCLUSION: Owing to positional properties, patients with localized primary unifocal UC-UVJ exhibited significant heterogeneity, leading to varied treatment strategies. No statistically significant differences in CSS or RFS were observed between the BC and UTUC groups. Furthermore, age, sex, T stage, tumor grade, and LVI should be carefully considered in clinical practice because of their associations with CSS and RFS.

Prognostic impact of tumor size in ureteral cancer following segmental ureterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the classification and prognostic effects of a 2 cm tumor size in patients with ureteral cancer (UC) undergoing segmental ureterectomy (SU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients with UC who underwent SU in our hospital between April 2013 and April 2023 were included in this study. The study population was grouped based on tumor size, which was defined as the maximum diameter of the pathological specimens, resulting in 30 patients (40.0%) with tumor size <2 cm and 45 patients (60.0%) with tumor size ≥2 cm. The clinicopathological variables, perioperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: A tumor ≥2 cm was related to a higher positive rate of urine exfoliative cytology (P = 0.049) and fewer preoperative ureteroscopies (P = 0.033) than tumors <2 cm. After a follow-up of 6.3 to 128.7 months (median 40.2 months), 23 cases (30.7%) experienced recurrence and 11 patients (14.7%) succumbed to UC in the end. Compared to those with tumor size <2 cm, patients with tumor size ≥2 cm experienced more urothelial recurrence (P = 0.032). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with tumor size ≥2 cm displayed inferior urothelial RFS than those with tumor size <2 cm (P = 0.026). Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor size ≥2 cm, and pathological stage ≥T2 were significant prognostic factors of poor urothelial RFS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with a high rate of urothelial recurrence and served as an independent prognostic factor of adverse urothelial RFS in SU-treated patients with UC. Patients are advised to select surgical treatments for UC following the EAU guidelines.