Incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma among lesions diagnosed as low-grade adenoma/dysplasia on endoscopic biopsy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Differentiation between gastric adenocarcinoma and low-grade adenoma/dysplasia (LGA) on endoscopic forceps biopsy is difficult. We aim to clarify the incidence of carcinoma in specimens, obtained by endoscopic resection (ER), from cases that had been diagnosed as LGA (Vienna category 3) on endoscopic biopsy. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients with gastric adenoma (Vienna category 3 or 4.1) diagnosed on endoscopic forceps biopsy were enrolled. All the specimens were subjected to histopathological central review. Primary endpoint was the incidence of carcinoma (Vienna category 4.2 or over) among the biopsy-proven gastric LGA. Secondary endpoints were the histological findings of resected specimens, clinicopathological features of carcinoma, and short-term outcomes of all ER cases. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with 104 lesions diagnosed as gastric adenoma were enrolled. After central review of the biopsy specimens, 47 lesions were diagnosed as LGA and seven lesions (15%) as adenocarcinoma (95% confidence interval, 7.6-28%). Carcinoma was detected in lesions that had a minimum size of 6 mm; the incidence of carcinoma was higher in the larger lesions. There was a histological discrepancy between biopsy and ER material in more than 60% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of biopsy-proven gastric LGA specimens were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma after ER. This indicated histological discrepancy between biopsy-proven gastric LGA and histology of the resected material.

Outcomes of ESD for patients with early gastric cancer and comorbid liver cirrhosis: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer and liver cirrhosis (LC) are often comorbid. However, little is known about the clinical outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with comorbid LC. METHODS: This case-control study used a multicentre retrospective cohort. We identified 69 LC patients from the cohort of patients with early gastric cancer, who underwent gastric ESD at 12 hospitals from March 2003 to November 2010. Using the propensity score matching method, 69 patients without LC were used to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of ESD. RESULTS: Among the 69 LC patients, 53 (77 %) were Child-Pugh grade A (CP-A) and 16 (28 %) had past or present histories of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Short-term outcomes did not differ between the LC patients and controls or between the CP-A and CP-B/C patients. Although the LC patients had significantly worse long-term outcomes than the controls (the 5-year overall survival rates were 60 vs. 91 %, respectively), patients with CP-A liver function without HCC histories had an overall survival almost equivalent to that of patients without LC (controls). CONCLUSIONS: LC patients appear to be good candidates for ESD if they have CP-A liver function and no history of HCC. Although their short-term outcomes were not inferior, the patients with Child-Pugh grades B/C or with histories of HCC benefited less from ESD.

[A Case of Rectal Stenosis For Gastric Cancer Recurrence Effectively Treated with a Colonic Stent].

A man in his 70s underwent distal gastrectomy and D1 dissection with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in March 2009 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. He was diagnosed with signet-ring cell carcinoma, Stage Ⅳ(T4a, N3a, H0, P1, CY1, M1) and R2. Seventeen cycles of S-1 plus CDDP were administered from April 2009 to December 2010 and 19 cycles of S-1 monotherapy were administered from January 2011 to March 2014. He developed peritoneal recurrence with serum tumor marker elevation in May 2014. Stenosis of the common bile duct, hydronephrosis, and rectal stenosis in Ra-Rs was observed in June 2014. A bile duct stent and a double J catheter was inserted. A colonic stent (NitiTM, 22 mm×6 cm) was also inserted. He could eat after the surgery and was discharged from the hospital. We suggest that a colonic stent is an effective treatment for colon stenosis due to peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer.

Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group.

BACKGROUND: After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer (EGC), patients are at high risk for synchronous or metachronous multiple gastric cancers. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the time at which multiple cancers develop and to determine whether scheduled endoscopic surveillance might control their development. DESIGN: A multicentre retrospective cohort study from 12 hospitals was conducted. Patients with EGC who underwent ESD with en bloc margin-negative curative resection were included. Synchronous cancer was classified as concomitant cancer or missed cancer. The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancers and overall survival rate were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From April 1999 to December 2010, 1258 patients met the inclusion criteria. Synchronous or metachronous multiple cancers were detected in 175 patients (13.9%) during a mean of 26.8 months. Among the 110 synchronous cancers, 21 were missed at the time of the initial ESD. Many of the missed lesions existed in the upper third of the stomach and the miss rate was associated with the endoscopist's inexperience (<500 oesophagogastroduodenoscopy cases). The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancers increased linearly and the mean annual incidence rate was 3.5%. The incidence rate did not differ between patients with or without Helicobacter pylori eradication. Four lesions (0.32%) were detected as massively invading cancers during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen per cent of synchronous cancers were not detected until the initial ESD. The incidence rate of metachronous cancer after ESD was constant. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance showed that almost all recurrent lesions were treatable by endoscopic resection.

[Gastroduodenal stent placement in gastric cancer patients with pyloric stenosis].

We examined 11 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastroduodenal stent placement for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction at our hospital, and assessed the significance and problems associated with stenting. None of the patients exhibited any complications associated with stenting, and the median post-stenting fasting period was 3 days(range, 1-7 days). Oral intake improved significantly in all the patients; in patients with nasogastric tubes, the tubes were removed after stenting. However, in patients with peritoneal dissemination, oral intake alone was not sufficient, and additional parenteral nutrition was required. In conclusion, gastroduodenal stenting is believed to be useful for palliative care in gastric cancer patients with pyloric stenosis.

Renal dysfunction is an independent risk factor for bleeding after gastric ESD.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide and gastric cancer sometimes occurs with CKD. However, the safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for patients with CKD are not clear. The aim of this study is to clarify the feasibility and safety of gastric ESD for patients with CKD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. In total, 144 patients with CKD who underwent gastric ESD between May 2003 and October 2012 were enrolled. The patients were divided into three groups: stage 3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: 30 - 59 mL/min), stage 4 (eGFR: 15 - 29 mL/min), and stage 5 (eGFR: < 15 mL/min) according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Guidelines. The en bloc and curative resection rates and complications were assessed as short-term outcomes. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan - Meier methods. RESULTS: In total, 92 patients were in stage 3 CKD; 23 in stage 4; and 29 in stage 5, including 19 patients in hemodialysis. The en bloc resection rate was 95.8 %. Post-ESD bleeding was observed in four patients with stage 5 CKD (13.8 %), three with stage 4 (13.0 %), and one with stage 3 (1.1 %). All bleeding could be controlled by endoscopic hemostasis, but five patients required blood transfusion. Perforation occurred in two patients (6.9 %) with stage 5 CKD, none (0 %) with stage 4, and two (4.3 %) with stage 3. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis revealed CKD stage 4 was a critical factor related to bleeding, whereas diabetes mellitus and CKD stage 5, which largely consist of patients receiving hemodialysis, were not. The median observation period of patients who achieved curative resection was 25.9 months (range 0.8-112.7 months) and the 3-year overall survival rate was 92.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated GFR is a significant independent predictive factor of post-ESD bleeding in patients with CKD.

Gastric ESD under Heparin Replacement at High-Risk Patients of Thromboembolism Is Technically Feasible but Has a High Risk of Delayed Bleeding: Osaka University ESD Study Group.

Objectives. Heparin replacement (HR) is often performed in patients with a high risk of thrombosis undergoing endoscopic procedures. However, information about the influence of HR is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical impact of HR for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods. This is a retrospective study comprising approximately 1310 consecutive gastric neoplasms in 1250 patients, who underwent ESD in 5 institutes. We assessed the clinical findings and outcomes of ESD under HR, compared to ESD without HR as control. Results. A total of 24 EGC lesions in 24 patients were treated by ESD under HR. In the HR group, the complete en-bloc resection rate was 100%. The delayed bleeding rate was, however, higher in the HR group than in the controls (38% versus 4.6%). The timing of bleeding in the HR group was significantly later than in controls. In the control group, 209 patients discontinued antithrombotic therapy during perioperative period, and their delayed bleeding rate was not different from those without antithrombotic therapy (5.7% versus. 4.4%). A thromboembolic event was encountered in 1 patient under HR after delayed bleeding. Conclusion. ESD under HR is technically feasible but has a high risk of delayed bleeding.