Comparison of clinical outcomes of influenza A and B at the 2017-2018 influenza season: a cohort study.

Influenza has significant morbidity and mortality. Some experts consider infection with influenza B as milder than that with influenza A. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza A or B in 2017-2018 influenza season. All hospitalized patients between October 2017 and April 2018 with laboratory-confirmed influenza A and B were included. The primary composite outcomes were pneumonia/myocarditis/encephalitis, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-/90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates. The study included 201 influenza A and 325 influenza B. For the primary composite outcome, no significant difference was demonstrated between influenza A and B. Rates of mortality were similar at 30 and 90 days. Influenza A had higher pneumonia rates and mechanical ventilation. On multivariate analysis, higher Charlson's score, hypoalbuminemia, and vasopressor use were associated with 30-day mortality, while infection with either influenza A or B was not. Influenza A was associated with higher pneumonia and mechanical ventilation rates. However, influenza B resulted with similar 30-day mortality rate as influenza A.

A decision support model to predict the presence of an acute infiltrate on chest radiograph.

A chest infiltrate is needed to make a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, but chest X-rays might be time consuming, entail radiation exposure, and demand resources that are not always available. We sought to derive a model to predict whether a patient will have an infiltrate on chest X-ray (CXR). This prospective observational study included patients visiting the Emergency Department of Beilinson Hospital in the years 2003-2004 (derivation cohort) and 2010-2011 (validation cohort), who had undergone a CXR, and were suspected of having a respiratory infection. We excluded all patients with possible healthcare associated infections. A logistic regression model was derived and applied to the validation cohort. A total of 1,555 patients met inclusion criteria: 993 in the derivation cohort and 562 in the validation cohort with 287 (29%) and 226 (40%) having an infiltrate, respectively. The derivation model area-under-the curve (AUC) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82). We categorized the patients into three groups-presence or absence of infiltrate, or undetermined. In the validation cohort, 70 (12%) patients were classified as 'no infiltrate'; 3 (4%) of them had an infiltrate, 367 (65%) were classified as 'infiltrate'; 190 (52%) of them had an infiltrate on CXR, and 125 (46%) were classified as 'undetermined'; 33 (26%) of them with an infiltrate on CXR. Using this prediction model for the evaluation of patients with suspected respiratory infection in an ED setting may help avoid over 10% of CXRs.

The effect of statins on the outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients.

UNLABELLED: Several studies have shown an association between exposure to statins and favorable clinical outcomes for various types of infections. We aimed to assess the impact of statin use on mortality, disease severity and complications among hospitalized patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Data were analyzed from a retrospectively collected database of 499 patients diagnosed with CDI during 2009-2014. We compared infection outcomes between 178 statin (36 %) users and 321 (64 %) non-users. On multivariate analysis, we found that statin use did not have a significant impact on 30-day mortality (OR = 1.54; 95 % CI, 0.85-2.79; p = 0.15) or any significant effect on CDI severity and complication. Concomitant statin use has no significant impact on short-term mortality or effect on CDI severity and complications among hospitalized patients with CDI. However, patients in the statin group were older and had higher Charlson score compared with the non-statin group. Whether these factors affected a possible impact of statins on the disease course remains to be investigated. KEY MESSAGES: • Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of infectious nosocomial diarrhea among hospitalized adult patients in the developed countries. • There is an increasing morbidity and mortality of CDI patients due to the emergence of new strains of high virulence. • Recent studies demonstrated that prior statin use has protective and ameliorating effects on morbidity and mortality among CDI patients. • Our study showed that concomitant statin use has no significant impact on short-term mortality, CDI severity and its complications.

Risk factors for long-term mortality of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a fatal disease. We aimed to describe risk factors for long-term mortality with SAB. We analyzed data from a retrospectively collected database including 1,692 patients with SAB. We considered variables of infection and background conditions for the analysis of long-term survival. The Kaplan-Meier procedure was used for analysis of long-term survival. Variables significantly associated with mortality were analyzed using a Cox regression model. We included 1,692 patients in the analysis. Patients were followed for up to 22 years. Within one year, 62% of patients died and within 5 years 72% died. A total of 82% of patients aged 65 years and older died within 5 years. Independent predictors of long-term mortality were older age (Hazard ratio 1.029, 95% confidence interval 1.022-1.036), female gender (HR 1.302, 95% CI 1.118-1.517), pneumonia or primary/ unknown source of infection (HR 1.441, 95% CI 1.230-1.689), dementia (HR 1.234, 95% CI 1.004-1.516), higher Charlson score (HR 1.155, 95% CI 1.115-1.196), shock at onset (HR 1.776, 95% CI 1.430-2.207) and arrival to hospitalization from an institution (HR 1.319, 95% CI 1.095-1.563). Long-term survival of patients older than 65 years and of women with SAB is severely curtailed.

The significance of persistent fever in the treatment of suspected bacterial infections among inpatients: a prospective cohort study.

Antibiotic escalations are frequently guided by fever persistence. Unnecessary antibiotic escalation is associated with resistance induction. We examined whether fever persistence is associated with adverse outcomes among medical inpatients with sepsis. In a single-center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive medical inpatients with suspected or documented bacterial infections. Data were collected on days 0, 2, 4, and 30 days from episode onset. We examined the association between fever persistence at 4 days and 30-day mortality on univariate and multivariate analysis. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IAET) was defined for patients with microbiologically documented infections (MDIs). Odds ratios (ORs) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 1,621 patients were included. Among patients with MDIs, 38/206 (18.4%) given appropriate empiric therapy had continued fever on day 4, compared to 64/231 (27.7%) of patients receiving IAET, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93. Fever persistence was not associated with mortality after adjustment for other risk factors. Among patients with presumed sepsis who did not have MDIs, persistent fever was significantly associated with 30-day mortality on a multivariate analysis, adjusted OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.78-4.31). Other risk factors for mortality included older age, nosocomial infections, malignancy, dyspnea, shock, decreased albumin, and elevated creatinine. For patients with MDIs, fever persistence for up to 4 days is a marker of IAET, but is not associated with mortality, and should not, in itself, trigger antibiotic escalation. For patients without MDIs, fever persistence should trigger careful re-evaluation, as it is associated with mortality.

Predicting Clostridium difficile infection in diabetic patients and the effect of metformin therapy: a retrospective, case-control study.

Data on risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in diabetic patients are scarce. Recently, it has been shown that metformin increases the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio; therefore, it may yield a protective effect against CDI. We aimed to assess risk factors for CDI in diabetic patients beyond antibiotic treatment, and to determine the impact of metformin therapy on the development of CDI in these patients. In this retrospective, case-control study, all consecutive CDI diabetic patients, from January 2009 to December 2013, were included and compared to consecutive diabetic patients without CDI, hospitalized during the same period and in the same departments. Of 7,670 patients tested for C. difficile toxins, 486 were diabetics. Of them, 150 (30.8 %) were positive for C. difficile toxins and 336 (69.1 %) were negative. On multivariate analysis, metformin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in CDI [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.93; p = 0.023], while heart failure was associated with significantly higher rates of CDI (OR = 1.654; 95 % CI, 1.007-2.716; p = 0.047), together with poor functional status, previous hospitalization, and abdominal surgery. Our findings suggest that, in diabetic patients, in addition to the well-recognized risk factors, heart failure is an additional risk factor for CDI, while metformin treatment seems to have a protective effect against the development of CDI. The exact mechanisms underlying this protective effect remain to be fully understood.

Long COVID sexual dysfunction among both genders: Evaluation of a cohort of COVID-19 recoverees.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess Long COVID sexual dysfunction among both sexes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study at a multidisciplinary COVID clinic. Consecutive patients answered a symptom-based questionnaire, which included sexual dysfunction. Individuals reporting any degree of sexual dysfunction were compared with those who denied. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors. A principal component analysis was implemented to explore other symptoms associated with sexual dysfunction. RESULTS: All in all, 391 individuals recovering from COVID-19 completed the questionnaire, 211 women and 180 men. Mean age was 45.2 (SD 15.4) years. Most (280, 85.9%) had mild COVID-19, assessed at a median of 3.8 (IQR 2.0) months from diagnosis. Sexual dysfunction was reported by 55 (36%) of the men and 48 (28%) of the women. Increased age [per year; men OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08)], long COVID cough [men 2.58 (1.05-6.32)], chest pain [women 3.54 (1.28-9.80)], irritability [women 3.45 (1.28-9.29)], paresthesia [men 4.23 (1.55-10.44); women 3.08 (1.14-8.32)], and emotional distress [men 3.26 (1.36-7.82); women 4.29 (1.65-11.18)] were significantly associated with sexual dysfunction. In women, sexual dysfunction was part of the emotional pattern, while among men, it was part of the emotional and pulmonary patterns. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction is a common manifestation of long COVID in both men and women. Presence of other long COVID symptoms, and older age, are associated with this phenomenon. Further studies should explore the mechanisms for long COVID sexual dysfunction in both men and women, as well as strategies for prevention and treatment.

Tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19-a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-6 inhibitors showed promising results in observational trials of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To evaluate whether interleukin-6 inhibitor tocilizumab (TCZ) reduces mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TCZ vs. placebo/control, for treatment of adults with COVID-19. Primary outcome was 28-30 days all-cause mortality. Search was conducted up to 1 April 2021. Two independent reviewers screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled. We performed subgroup analysis for patients with critical illness and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included, assessing 6481 patients with mostly severe non-critical COVID-19 infection. TCZ was associated with a reduction in all-cause 28-30-day mortality compared to placebo/control (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.96). Among the subgroup of critically ill patients no reduced mortality was demonstrated (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). No mortality benefit with TCZ was demonstrated in trials that used steroids for >80% of patients. TCZ was associated with significantly reduced risk for mechanical ventilation (MV); for combined endpoint of death or MV and for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. No significant difference in adverse events was demonstrated. Risk of serious superinfection was significantly lower with TCZ (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93). CONCLUSION: The treatment with TCZ reduces 28-30 days all-cause mortality, ICU admission, superinfections, MV and the combined endpoint of death or MV. Among critically ill patients, and when steroids were used for most patients, no mortality benefit was demonstrated. Additional research should further define sub-groups that would benefit most and preferred timing of administration of TCZ in severe COVID-19.

Anti-herpesvirus prophylaxis, pre-emptive treatment or no treatment in adults undergoing allogeneic transplant for haematological disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Herpesviridae infections incur significant morbidity and indirect effects on mortality among allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of antiviral prevention strategies among haemato-oncological individuals undergoing allo-HCT. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS. We further searched for conference proceedings and trial registries. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Adults with haematological malignancy undergoing allo-HCT. INTERVENTIONS: Antiviral prophylaxis versus no treatment/placebo or pre-emptive treatment and pre-emptive treatment versus prophylaxis with the same agent. METHODS: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted computing pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI and the inconsistency measure (I2). The certainty of the evidence was appraised by GRADE. RESULTS: We included 22 RCTs. Antiviral prophylaxis reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7-0.99; 15 trials, I2 = 0%), cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.85; n = 15, I2 = 20%) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) disease (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.2-0.43; n = 13, I2 = 18%) compared with no treatment/placebo or pre-emptive treatment, all with high-certainty evidence. Furthermore, antivirals reduced HSV infection, CMV pneumonitis, CMV infection and varicella zoster virus disease. Anti-CMV prophylaxis (+/- pre-emptive treatment) compared with pre-emptive treatment alone reduced non-significantly all-cause mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.6-1.02; n = 8, I2 = 0%), CMV disease (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.97; n = 9, I2 = 30%) and HSV disease (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.67; n = 4, I2 = 0%) with high-certainty evidence, as well as CMV and HSV infections. Antiviral prophylaxis did not result in increased adverse event rates overall or more discontinuation due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral prophylaxis directed against herpesviruses is highly effective and safe, reducing mortality, HSV and CMV disease, as well as herpesvirus reactivations among allo-HCT recipients. Anti-CMV prophylaxis is more effective than pre-emptive treatment alone with respect to HSV and CMV disease and infection.

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for the treatment of sepsis in adults - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The pleiotropic effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) might have a beneficial effect in sepsis through several mechanisms. The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of statins, compared with placebo, for the treatment of sepsis in adults. METHODS: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2017, Issue 12), OVID MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 2018), Embase (Ovid SP, from 1974 to January 2018), and LILACS (from 1986 to January 2018). We also searched the trial registries ISRCTN and ClinicalTrials.gov to January 2018. The eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment of statins versus placebo in adult patients who were hospitalized due to sepsis. Participants were adults (16 years and older) hospitalized because of sepsis or who developed sepsis during admission. Interventions were treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) versus no treatment or placebo. We performed a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials published until January 2018, assessing the efficacy and safety of statins in sepsis treatment. Two primary outcomes were assessed: 30-day overall mortality and deterioration to severe sepsis during management. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, need for mechanical ventilation and drug related adverse events. RESULTS: Fourteen trials evaluating 2628 patients were included. Statins did not reduce 30-day all-cause mortality neither in all patients (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.10), nor in a subgroup of patients with severe sepsis (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12). The certainty of evidence for both outcomes was high. There was no change in the rate of adverse events between study arms (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.63). The certainty of evidence for this outcome was high. CONCLUSIONS: The use of statin therapy in adults for the indication of sepsis is not recommended.

Reporting infections in clinical trials of patients with haematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Infections are common among patients treated for haematological malignancies and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The completeness of reporting infectious complications in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for haematological malignancies is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the completeness of reporting infectious complications in RCTs assessing treatments for haematological malignancies. DATA SOURCE: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed database. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND PARTICIPANTS: All primary published phase II/III RCTs between September 2016 and September 2018 evaluating treatments for haematological malignancies in adult patients were included. INTERVENTION: Reporting infectious complications. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the completeness of reporting. Study characteristics and data concerning reporting of infectious complications were collected by two independent reviewers. Quality of reporting was assessed using a modification of the CONSORT extension checklist for harms, including 15 items. RESULTS: One-hundred and seven RCTs were included. Most trials (97; 91%) provided some report on infections. Approximately half reported on each of pneumonia, sepsis and neutropenic fever; 12 trials (11%) reported on fungal infections. Only nine trials (8%) listed infections by type of pathogen (i.e. bacterial, fungal or viral) and 48 (45%) by source/type of infection (i.e. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, etc.). Most trials did not address infections in their title, abstract, introduction or discussion. Median number of items of the CONSORT modification reported was 7 points, (interquartile range (IQR) 6-9) for all included trials, with lower median for 34 acute leukaemia trials (median 6, IQR 5-8). CONCLUSIONS: Most trials evaluating treatment for haematological malignancies provide some data relating to infectious complications. The reports are mostly incomplete and rarely provided in a structured presentation.

Antimicrobial consumption and impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobials are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) is often challenging because of scarce data in this setting. OBJECTIVES: This narrative review aimed to provide data about antibiotic consumption in LTCFs and the need, implementation, and organization of ASPs in this setting. SOURCE: PubMed was searched for studies assessing antimicrobial consumption and implementation of ASPs in LTCFs. The search was restricted to articles published in English in the last 10 years. Experts belonging to the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in the Elderly (ESGIE) reviewed the selected studies and evaluated the studies on ASPs according to the GRADE approach. Moreover, the quality of reporting has been assessed according to TREND and CONSORT checklists for quasi-experimental and cluster randomized clinical trials (cRCT), respectively. CONTENT: Data on antibiotic consumption in LTCFs show great variability in LTCFs across and within countries. Reasons for this variability are difficult to analyse because of the differences in the types of LTCFs, their organization, and the population cared-for in the different LTCFs. However, studies show that the use of antibiotics among elderly patients in LTCFs, especially in cases of asymptomatic bacteriuria and influenza-like syndromes, is often inappropriate. High-quality cRCTs and low to moderate quality quasi-experimental studies show that educational interventions direct at nurse and physicians are effective in reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. IMPLICATIONS: There is an urgent need for ASPs tailored for LTCFs. Multifaceted organized educational interventions, involving both clinicians and nursing staff, should be advocated and require institutional intervention by health authorities. Future studies assessing the impact of well-defined ASPs in LTCFs should produce compelling evidence in this setting.

Combining VITEK® 2 with colistin agar dilution screening assist timely reporting of colistin susceptibility.

OBJECTIVES: The rise in carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has renewed interest in colistin. Recently, the EUCAST-CLSI Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group declared that broth microdilution (BMD) is the only valid method for colistin susceptibility testing. BMD is not easily incorporated into the routine work of clinical laboratories, and usually this test is incorporated serially, resulting in delayed susceptibility reporting. We tested a strategy of combining VITEK® 2 with a 2 µg/mL colistin agar dilution (VITEK® 2/AD) screening plate to improve performance and time to reporting of colistin susceptibility. METHODS: Colistin susceptibility for 364 clinical isolates was determined by VITEK® 2/AD and compared with the reference standard BMD according to the ISO 20776-1:2007 and CLSI guidelines. The EUCAST colistin susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 µg/mL was used. Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 served as quality control strain. Agreement, very major error (VME) and major error rates were determined using ISO 20776-2:2007. RESULTS: The VME rate for VITEK® 2 alone was 30.6% (15/49, 95% CI 18.3-45.4%), and was reduced to 10.2% (5/49, 95% CI 3.4-22.2%) using the VITEK® 2/AD combined testing. The combined testing had categorical agreement with BMD of 97% (354/364, 95% CI 95.0-98.7%), and a major error (ME) rate of 1.6% (5/315, 95% CI 0.5-3.7%). Using the combined testing, even against challenging strains, 349 (95.8%, 95% CI 93.3-97.7%) colistin susceptibility results could be reported, and only 15 isolates required further analysis by BMD. DISCUSSION: Our method is simple to apply and allows rapid reporting of colistin susceptibility.

Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.

OBJECTIVES: Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov entries and matching publications were previously described in general medicine. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of reporting in trials addressing systemic antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for completed phase III trials comparing antibiotic regimens until May 2017. Matched publications were identified in PubMed. Two independent reviewers extracted data and identified inconsistencies. Reporting was assessed among studies started before and after 1 July 2005, when the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) required mandatory registration as a prerequisite for considering a trial for publication. RESULTS: Matching publications were identified for 75 (70%) of 107 ClinicalTrials.gov entries. Median time from study completion to publication was 26 months (interquartile range 19-42). Primary outcome definition was inconsistent between ClinicalTrials.gov and publications in seven trials (7/72, 10%) and reporting of the primary outcome timeframe was inconsistent in 14 (14/71, 20%). Secondary outcomes definitions were inconsistent in 36 trials (36/66, 55%). Reporting of inclusion criteria and study timeline were inconsistent in 17% (13/65) and 3% (2/65), respectively. Trials started after July 2005 were significantly less likely to have reporting inconsistencies and were published in higher impact factor journals. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower inconsistency rate of outcome reporting compared with other medical disciplines. Reporting completeness and consistency were significantly better after July 2005. The ICMJE requirement for mandatory registration was associated with significant improvement in reporting quality in infectious diseases trials. Prolonged time lag to publication and missing data from unpublished trials should raise a discussion on current reporting and publishing procedures.

Colistin exposure as a risk factor for infections caused by inherently colistin resistant Enterobacteriaceae-a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies have suggested an association between increased colistin use and selection for inherently colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ICRE). We aimed to evaluate whether colistin exposure is a risk factor for ICRE infection. METHODS: A matched 1:1 case-control study including patients recently hospitalized for ≥14 days with ICRE infection as cases matched with similar patients with a clinical isolate of a colistin-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae as controls was performed. Univariate analysis using McNemar test and multivariate analysis were conducted to explore risk factors for ICRE isolation, including colistin exposure 90 days before the positive culture. RESULTS: We included 446 patients, 223 cases and 223 controls matched for gender, age, department, year, source of culture and duration of hospitalization before positive culture. Colistin exposure was significantly associated with ICRE isolation in both univariate (14/223, 6.3% of cases versus 4/223, 1.8% of controls, p 0.031) and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 4.415, 95% CI 1.078-18.082). Curtailed functional capacity was a significant risk factor for ICRE as well. Exposure to other broad-spectrum antibiotics was associated with isolation of a colistin-susceptible pathogen. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to colistin is associated with an increased risk of isolating an inherently colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients with prolonged hospitalization. This should be taken into account while considering empirical therapy for such patients. Use of colistin should be judicious. The correlation between duration and magnitude of exposure and ICRE infection should be investigated in further studies.

Antibacterial prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin for patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma undergoing autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation: a quasi-experimental single-centre before-after study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study whether ciprofloxacin prophylaxis reduces infectious complications in patients undergoing autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental, retrospective, before-after study. We compared the incidence of bacterial-related complications among 356 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (n = 202) and lymphoma (n = 154) who underwent AHCT with (n = 177) or without (n = 179) ciprofloxacin prophylaxis between 03/2007 and 10/2012 and between 10/2012 and 07/2016, respectively, at a single centre. RESULTS: Febrile neutropaenia, bacteraemia, and pneumonia were significantly more common among patients who underwent AHCT during the second study period and did not receive antibacterial prophylaxis compared with patients who underwent AHCT during the first study period and received antibacterial prophylaxis (89.9% (161/179) vs. 83.1% (147/177), difference 6.9%, 95% CI 0-14.1%, P = 0.002; 15.1% (27/179) vs. 4.5% (8/177), difference 10.6%, 95% CI 4.4-16.9%, p < 0.0001; 12.3% (22/179) vs. 6.2% (11/177), difference 6.1%, 95% CI 0-12.3%, p = 0.04, respectively). The number-needed-to-treat to prevent one episode of bacteraemia, pneumonia, and febrile neutropaenia was 8.6, 8.5, and 13.7, respectively. Patients with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis had higher rates of ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteraemia (62.5% (5/8) vs. 18.5% (5/27), difference 44%, 95% CI 7-70%, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis significantly decreased the odds of bacteraemia (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.52; p < 0.0001) and pneumonia (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: According to our single-centre experience, patients with MM and lymphoma undergoing AHCT may benefit from antibacterial prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin.

Risk factors associated with death or neurological deterioration among patients with Gram-negative postneurosurgical meningitis.

In a retrospective cohort of 115 patients with Gram-negative postneurosurgical meningitis, factors associated with 30-day mortality or neurological deterioration on multivariate analysis included days from admission to meningitis (OR 1.05 per day, 95% CI 1.02-1.09), decreased level of consciousness (OR 2.69, 95% CI 0.99-7.31), blood glucose level >180 mg/dL (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.27-10.77), higher creatinine level (OR 4.07 per 1 mg/dL, 95% CI 1.50-11.08), and cerebrospinal fluid glucose <50 mg/dL (OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.71-14.77) at diagnosis. A predictive score triaged patients into three groups with low (4/44, 9.1%), intermediate (16/38, 42.1%) and high (22/33, 66.7%) unfavourable outcome rates. Validation on a different group of 36 patients with Gram-negative postneurosurgical meningitis was acceptable.

Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with efficacy in patients with MRSA infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recent Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections recommend maintaining vancomycin trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L for serious infections. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies assessing the impact of low (<15 mg/L) vs. high (≥ 15 mg/L) vancomycin trough level on the efficacy of MRSA infections treatment. Four prospective and 12 retrospective studies were included (2003 participants). No significant difference was demonstrated between low and high vancomycin trough level for the outcome of all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.46, I(2) = 28%). In studies evaluating mainly MRSA pneumonia, there was significantly higher mortality with low vancomycin level (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.84). No significant difference was demonstrated in treatment failure rates (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88-1.78, I(2) = 51%). However, excluding one outlier study from the analysis, treatment failure became significantly higher in patients with low vancomycin trough level (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12-1.91, I(2) = 16%). Microbiologic failure rates were significantly higher in patients with low vancomycin levels (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.26, I(2) = 0%). Nephrotoxicity was significantly higher with vancomycin levels of ≥ 15 mg/L. However, no cases of irreversible renal damage were reported. Current data on the effectiveness of higher vancomycin trough levels in the treatment of MRSA infections are limited to few prospective and mainly retrospective studies. Our findings support the current recommendations for maintaining vancomycin trough levels of ≥ 15 mg/L in the treatment of severe MRSA infections, although no difference in all-cause mortality was observed.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in infectious diseases: topics that merit special attention.

As in other disciplines in medicine, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) in infectious diseases are an important aid to clinical decision-making. In the present article we review features important to SRs in infectious diseases that should be addressed in most SRs and MAs. We stress the need to include in the SR analysis all patients that were randomized; and all studies that were performed. Authors of SRs should choose one main outcome that matters to patients, and base their conclusions mainly on this outcome. Resistance as an outcome is a topic that should be addressed in all SRs of antibiotic treatment. Ethical aspects and especially patients' safety should be addressed in SRs.