Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 20(6): 502-6, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15706457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small colonic polyps are difficult to palpate and thus difficult to localize during surgery. Preoperative injection of dyes and "on-the-table colonoscopy" are some of the methods used to allow the surgeon to find the polyps. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of intraoperative ultrasound as a tool that may allow detection of small colonic polyps during surgery. RESULTS: The study population consisted of nine consecutive patients referred to surgery for polyps of the large bowel that were not amenable to endoscopic removal. At surgery, the colon was filled with saline and than scanned by linear ultrasound probe. In 8 out of 9 patients, intraoperative ultrasound successfully detected all polyps, even those smaller than 0.5 cm. In one patient with two polyps, one in the right colon was easily localized, but a second flat, 0.4-cm tubular adenoma at the splenic flexure was missed. In three patients, intraoperative ultrasound showed penetration into the muscular coat. These polyps were found on pathology to be invasive cancer. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ultrasound makes it possible for surgeons to easily localize small nonpalpable polyps of the large bowel. Furthermore, it can determine the aggressive potential of these lesions with great accuracy.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Colonoscopia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ultrassonografia
2.
World J Surg ; 29(5): 645-8, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15827859

RESUMO

Second-look laparotomy is one of the mainstays of surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). The aim of this study was to analyze its role in the survival of patients with infarcted gangrenous bowel resulting from AMI. A retrospective chart review of all patients admitted over the study period was undertaken. The study population consisted of 41 patients with clinical evidence of peritonitis and gangrenous, perforated bowel on surgical exploration. Outcome was compared among patients who underwent second-look laparotomy and those who did not. Fifteen patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of less than 4 underwent second-look laparotomy. Six patients had residual necrotic bowel that required additional resection. Only one (17%) of them survived. Of the nine remaining patients, who had no evidence of necrosis, only two survived (22%). Overall survival in this group was 20%. Twenty-six patients were managed without second-look laparotomy. Nine of them, with an ASA score of 4-5, died soon after the operation. The decision not to operate on the remaining 17 patients with an ASA score < 4 was made by an experienced surgeon. Eleven of those patients (65%) survived. Overall survival in the non-second-look group was 42%. Excluding the early deaths, the survival in the non re-explored group was significantly higher than in the second-look group (65% vs. 20%, p = 0.011). A selective approach to the surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia based on the sound clinical judgment of an experienced surgeon may be as appropriate as its universal application.


Assuntos
Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/complicações , Oclusão Vascular Mesentérica/cirurgia , Peritonite/mortalidade , Cirurgia de Second-Look , Doença Aguda , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia , Masculino , Peritonite/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA