RESUMO
There is an unmet need for developing drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea, due to rapidly evolving resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae against antimicrobial drugs used for empiric therapy, an increase in globally reported multidrug resistant cases, and the limited available therapeutic options. Furthermore, few drugs are under development. Development of antimicrobials is hampered by challenges in clinical trial design, limitations of available diagnostics, changes in and varying standards of care, lack of robust animal models, and clinically relevant pharmacodynamic targets. On April 23, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health co-sponsored a workshop with stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to discuss the challenges and strategies, including potential collaborations and incentives, to facilitate the development of drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea. This article provides a summary of the workshop.
RESUMO
Pressing challenges in the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) include emerging and rare pathogens, resistant/refractory infections, and antifungal armamentarium limited by toxicity, drug-drug interactions, and lack of oral formulations. Development of new antifungal drugs is hampered by the limitations of the available diagnostics, clinical trial endpoints, prolonged trial duration, difficulties in patient recruitment, including subpopulations (eg, pediatrics), and heterogeneity of the IFIs. On 4 August 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration convened a workshop that included IFI experts from academia, industry, and other government agencies to discuss the IFI landscape, unmet need, and potential strategies to facilitate the development of antifungal drugs for treatment and prophylaxis. This article summarizes the key topics presented and discussed during the workshop, such as incentives and research support for drug developers, nonclinical development, clinical trial design challenges, lessons learned from industry, and potential collaborations to facilitate antifungal drug development.
Assuntos
Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Micoses , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Criança , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Micoses/tratamento farmacológico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Interações MedicamentosasRESUMO
Coccidioidomycosis is a fungal disease endemic to the southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central and South America. Prevalence rates are increasing steadily, and new endemic areas of Coccidioides are emerging. Standard treatment is often administered for months to decades, and intolerance to medications and treatment failures are common. No new treatments for coccidioidomycosis have been approved in the United States in nearly 40 years. On 5 August 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration convened experts in coccidioidomycosis from academia, industry, patient groups, and other government agencies to discuss the disease landscape and strategies to facilitate product development for treatment of coccidioidomycosis. This article summarizes the key topics concerning drug development for coccidioidomycosis presented by speakers and panelists during the workshop, such as unmet need, trial designs, endpoints, incentives, research and development support, and collaborations to facilitate antifungal drug development.
Assuntos
Coccidioidomicose , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Coccidioides , Coccidioidomicose/tratamento farmacológico , Coccidioidomicose/epidemiologia , Coccidioidomicose/microbiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
Pathogenesis of neonatal candidiasis (NC) is distinct from systemic candidiasis in adults and older pediatric patients due to the significant incidence of central nervous system involvement in neonates. Thus, although adequate and well-controlled trials in NC are often unfeasible due to difficulty enrolling patients, extrapolation of efficacy from antifungal drug trials in adults is generally not appropriate. However, treatment of NC is an area of great unmet need. We describe a regulatory review approach that combined the assessment of limited clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety data from neonates and young infants along with microbiology outcomes and pharmacokinetic data from relevant nonclinical models of candidemia/invasive candidiasis to inform the use of micafungin in pediatric patients younger than 4 months, while communicating areas of remaining uncertainty in labeling.
Assuntos
Candidíase Invasiva , Adulto , Antifúngicos/farmacocinética , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candidíase Invasiva/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Micafungina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
For treatment of severe malaria, the World Health Organization recommends 3 mg/kg intravenous artesunate in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg. Here we describe the Food and Drug Administration's rationale for selecting 2.4 mg/kg in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg based on literature review and independent analyses.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos , Malária Falciparum , Malária , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Artemisininas , Artesunato/uso terapêutico , Peso Corporal , Criança , Humanos , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Some new drug applications fail because of inadequate drug performance and others are not approved because the information submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is unsatisfactory to make that determination. Resubmission of failed applications is costly, delaying marketing approval and the availability of new drugs to patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify the reasons that FDA marketing approval for new drugs was delayed or denied. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of FDA documents and extraction of data were performed. We examined all drug applications first submitted to the FDA between 2000 and 2012 for new molecular entities (NMEs), which are active ingredients never before marketed in the United States in any form. Using FDA correspondence and reviews, we investigated the reasons NMEs failed to obtain FDA approval. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reasons for delayed FDA approval or nonapproval of NME applications. RESULTS: Of the 302 identified NME applications, 151 (50%) were approved when first submitted and 222 (73.5%) were ultimately approved. Seventy-one applications required 1 or more resubmissions before approval, with a median delay to approval of 435 days following the first unsuccessful submission. Of the unsuccessful first-time applications, 24 (15.9%) included uncertainties related to dose selection, 20 (13.2%) choice of study end points that failed to adequately reflect a clinically meaningful effect, 20 (13.2%) inconsistent results when different end points were tested, 17 (11.3%) inconsistent results when different trials or study sites were compared, and 20 (13.2%) poor efficacy when compared with the standard of care. The frequency of safety deficiencies was similar among never-approved drugs compared with those with delayed approval (43 of 80 never approved [53.8%] vs 37 of 71 eventually approved [52.1%]; difference, 1.7% [95% CI, -14.86% to 18.05%]; P = .87). However, efficacy deficiencies were significantly more frequent among the never-approved drugs than among those with delayed approvals (61 of 80 never approved [76.3%] vs 28 of 71 eventually approved [39.4%]; difference, 36.9% [95% CI, 20.25% to 50.86%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Several potentially preventable deficiencies, including failure to select optimal drug doses and suitable study end points, accounted for significant delays in the approval of new drugs. Understanding the reasons for previous failures is helpful to improve the efficiency of clinical development for new drugs.
Assuntos
Aplicação de Novas Drogas em Teste , United States Food and Drug Administration , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Determinação de Ponto Final , Controle de Formulários e Registros , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Unique challenges remain in the development of new drugs for the treatment of TB. While existing multidrug treatment regimens are prolonged and difficult for patients to adhere to, they are highly efficacious, setting a high bar for the performance of new agents. Complicating matters more, regulatory standards have changed since the first drugs for TB were introduced, with a rigorous characterization of the effect of a new drug within a combination regimen expected. If these demands are to be satisfied, innovative models will be needed to demonstrate drug efficacy. In the past, mycobacterial cultures performed on solid media at the end of treatment have been used as critical biomarkers of drug efficacy, but their inability to predict long-term outcomes with precision has limited their utility. This article reviews a range of nonclinical and clinical models to characterize the bactericidal and/or sterilizing activity of new compounds. Novel approaches, using in vitro and animal models, sensitive biomarkers, as well as creative new clinical trial designs, are discussed. These promise a timely expansion of our TB treatment armamentarium to include potent new drugs and shorter, simpler treatment regimens.
Assuntos
Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/análise , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efeitos dos fármacos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Combinação de Medicamentos , Desenho de Fármacos , Humanos , Camundongos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/patologiaRESUMO
Antimicrobial resistance is increasing among bacterial pathogens. In particular, organisms producing extended spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes (ESBLs) and AmpC chromosomal beta-lactamase enzymes are resistant to third generation cephalosporins and pose a formidable challenge in the management of seriously ill patients. Carbapenems are a class of broad-spectrum antibiotics with stability against ESBL and AmpC chromosomal beta-lactamases. They are well tolerated by patients. This review will examine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two carbapenems imipenem and meropenem and discuss their clinical use in children. References are limited to the English language and extend back to 1980. Sources include computerized databases such as MEDLINE searched using PubMed, and bibliographies of recent articles and books. Approximately 50% of the articles initially reviewed are included in the bibliography. Carbapenems are efficacious in the treatment of a variety of bacterial infections including meningitis, pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, bone, joint and urinary tract infections. The broad spectrum activity and comparatively low toxicity of carbapenems make them valuable therapeutic agents in the treatment of seriously ill patients with bacterial infections. These agents should be used judiciously in order to minimize the risk for development of carbapenem-resistant pathogens.