Relationship between ideal cardiovascular health metrics and hearing loss: A 10-year retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The role of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics in developing hearing loss remains uncertain. Thus, our objective was to analyse the connection between hearing loss and ideal CVH metrics in a 10-year retrospective cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A health management centre in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Participants who underwent the first annual health check-up between 2000 and 2006 and with a follow-up check-up more than ten years later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing thresholds were measured at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. Individuals with a best ear pure-tone audiometry four-frequency average of >25 dB HL were defined as having hearing loss. The ideal CVH metrics were classified into 7 categories based on the American Heart Association's definition. The associations of hearing loss with the sum of the ideal CVH metrics and each ideal CVH metric were examined by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The present study consisted of 6974 participants. The 10-year follow-up showed that the odds ratio (OR) of hearing loss was .74 for participants with 5-7 ideal CVH metrics (95% CI, .59-.93, p = .01) compared with those with 0-2 ideal CVH metrics. Among the CVH metrics, participants with an ideal smoking status might have reduced odds of developing hearing loss; the OR was .72 (95% CI, .58-.89, p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with an increased number of ideal CVH metrics and better performance on the smoking metric had a significantly protective effect regarding hearing loss development.

Favorable self­rated health is associated with ideal cardiovascular health: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Both self­rated health (SRH) and the cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics of the American Heart Association have been reported as predictors of cardiovascular events. However, a longitudinal study of the relationships between these metrics has not been conducted before. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association between SRH and CVH metrics in a longitudinal study involving an Asian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible participants were enrolled between 2009 and 2014. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between SRH and overall ideal CVH metrics as well as each ideal CVH metric at baseline and during follow­up. Additionally, we classified participants into 3 groups according to the change in SRH after 3 years of follow­up and analyzed the changes in ideal CVH metrics in these groups. RESULTS: Our study group consisted of 15 608 participants. After a mean follow­up of 2.69 years, participants who classified their health as "Poor" or "Very Poor" had reduced odds ratios (ORs) for ideal CVH metrics, with ORs of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.85; P = 0.001) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37-0.96; P = 0.03) for "Poor" and "Very Poor" SRH, respectively. In contrast, the odds for increased ideal CVH metrics rose as SRH improved (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in SRH ratings might accurately reflect changes in CVH metrics. Our longitudinal study demonstrated that SRH was significantly associated with the number of ideal CVH metrics. Our findings provide epidemiological evidence for future public health strategies targeting cardiovascular disease.

Hypertension control and risk of colonic diverticulosis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diverticulosis has increased in our aging population, but the risk factors for diverticulosis are not fully understood. The role of hypertension in the risk of diverticulosis remains uncertain. This study investigated whether hypertension is associated with asymptomatic colorectal diverticulosis. METHODS: This study enrolled asymptomatic patients who received a colonoscopy as part of a health check. Hypertension was defined by actual measured blood pressure. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between hypertension and diverticulosis. In addition, we established three logistic regression models for covariate adjustment, and further stratified patients with hypertension into three subgroups based on their type of hypertension. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 2748 participants, including 141 participants with diverticulosis and 2607 participants without diverticulosis. After adjustments for potential covariates, the odds ratio (OR) for having diverticulosis was 1.83 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.75, p = 0.004) in the hypertension group compared with the group without hypertension. In subgroup analyses, hypertension without antihypertensive medication use, and hypertension despite the use of antihypertensive medication were also significantly associated with the occurrence of asymptomatic diverticulosis (OR = 1.73, p = 0.028; OR = 2.07, p = 0.013, respectively). Current normal blood pressure under antihypertensive drug therapy was not associated with diverticulosis (OR = 1.74, p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a positive association between hypertension and diverticulosis. Participants with poorly controlled blood pressure were found to have a higher risk of asymptomatic diverticulosis. Our study presents epidemiologic evidence for future prevention strategies against diverticulosis.