Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 11(6): 754-7, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20847068

RESUMO

Isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been shown to have less deleterious effects than standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated and compared clinical results of combined AVR with CABG using MECC. We prospectively collected preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data of 65 patients who underwent combined AVR with CABG using MECC and compared these with 135 patients undergoing combined AVR with CABG using standard CPB. No significant differences were seen in patients demographic characteristics or intraoperative data. Patients in the MECC group experienced a smaller preoperative haemoglobin drop (4.5±0.8 g/dl vs. 5.0±0.5 g/dl, P=0.002) resulting in higher haemoglobin at discharge (11.3±1.3 g/dl vs. 10.8±1.1 g/dl, P=0.03). They had decreased blood products requirements (P=0.004) compared to patients in the standard CPB group. No differences were noted in pulmonary complications, neurological events or mortality. We present for the first time data showing that combined AVR with CABG using MECC is feasible and provides better clinical results compared to standard CPB with regard to blood products requirements, without compromising operative morbidity or mortality.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Circulação Extracorpórea , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Circulação Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Circulação Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 87(3): 720-5, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19231379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimal access aortic valve replacement (mAVR) has been demonstrated to be beneficial over standard median sternotomy. Similarly, minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been shown to have less deleterious effects than conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. We report a previously undescribed technique for AVR in combination with MECC by minimal access. METHODS: We prospectively collected data including one-month postoperative follow-up of the first 50 patients who underwent mAVR utilizing MECC. A temporary Cordis Ventricor (Cordis Corp, Miami, FL) ventricular pacemaker and external defibrillation pads were placed at induction. A J-shaped partial upper sternotomy ending in the third intercostal space was performed. Cannulation was performed in the groin using the Seldinger technique. A vent was introduced directly in the pulmonary artery. Warm blood cardioplegia and carbon dioxide field flooding were used. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients (24 male) with a mean age of 68 (range, 34 to 89) were operated between May and December 2007. Operating time was 147 +/- 20 minutes, cross-clamp time was 64 +/- 10 minutes, and perfusion time was 84 +/- 17 minutes. There were no conversions to median sternotomy. Only one peroperative blood transfusion was required and postoperative blood loss was 372 +/- 170 cc. Intensive care unit stay was uneventful (average stay 2 days, range 1 to 8). One patient required a permanent pacemaker and other complications included pneumothorax, superficial wound infection, a late transient postoperative neurologic deficit, and excessive postoperative blood loss requiring mediastinal reexploration. Renal failure and major cerebral accidents did not occur. There was a 100% survival at one-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: We have shown that minimal access aortic valve replacement using minimal extracorporeal circulation is feasible and provides excellent clinical and cosmetic results.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Circulação Extracorpórea , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA