Value of Bax and Bcl2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells for clinical prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure.

To investigate the expression of Bax and Bcl2 protein in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), and to analyze their value for predicting major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) in CHF patients. A total of 154 fasting venous blood samples from CHF patients were collected in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2019, and they were divided into 2 group according to whether MACE occurred during 3 years follow-up, MACE group and No-MACE group. Levels of Bax and Bcl2 protein expression in PBMC of CHF patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and then evaluated the predictive power of Bax and Bcl2 expression for MACE using logistic regression analysis and ROC curve. 62 (40.26%) of 154 CHF patients occurred MACE during follow-up, and there were significant differences in age, diabetes, LVEF, LDL-C and NYHA grade between MACE group and No-MACE group. Levels of Bax protein expression in PBMC of CHF patients in MACE group were significantly higher than those in No-MACE group, while levels of Bcl2 protein expression were significantly lower than those in No-MACE group, and Bax and Bcl2 protein levels increased and decreased with NYHA grades in MACE group and No-MACE group, respectively. Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Bax (OR, 1.026; 95% CI, 1.003-1.049; P = .027) and Bcl2 levels (OR, 0.952; 95% CI, 0.908-0.998; P = .041) were independent predictive factors for MACE in CHF patients. In addition, Bax and Bcl2 levels could be used to differentiate CHF patients at risk for MACE with an AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.660-0.827) and an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI: 0.667-0.819), respectively. Levels of Bax and Bcl2 protein in PBMC could be used as independent predictive factors for MACE in CHF patients.

Gender difference in clinical outcomes of the patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous researches have reported the controversial results regarding the gender difference in clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate whether gender difference existed in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were searched up to February 10, 2018. Studies comparing the gender-specific effect on clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention were identified, to analyze mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and revascularization. Statistical software RevMan was utilized in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies, involving 1,032,828 patients (774,115 males and 258,713 females) reporting gender-specific outcomes, were included in this study. The in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and at least 2-years mortality in male patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention were significantly lower than those of females (odds ratio [OR] 0.58 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.63, P < .001; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61-0.66, P = .04; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60-0.75, P < .001 and OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79, P = .005, respectively). The MACE was significantly decreased in male subjects after initial percutaneous coronary intervention compared with females in <1-year or at least 1-year (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.56-0.80, P < .001 and OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93, P < .001). The male patients after percutaneous coronary intervention harbored higher rate of revascularization compared with females for at least 1-year (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36, P < .001), while the rate of revascularization in male patients for < 1-year was lower than that of females (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.26, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the prognosis of male patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention is better than that of females, except for long-term revascularization.

The impact of gender difference on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) has been recommended as a standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. However, some studies have reported different clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between male and female patients who received CRT. This Meta-analysis is to determine whether gender difference has any significant impact on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with heart failure after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library database were searched. A total of 149,259 patients in 11 studies were identified. Our analysis demonstrated that women showed lower all-cause mortality than men after CRT (odds ratio[OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36 to 0.70). No significant difference was observed in the increment of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class(standard mean difference[SMD] -0.07,95% CI -0.15 to 0.01), 6-minitue walk distance (6-MWD) (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.17), and quality of life (QoL) (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.03). With respect to the echocardiographic parameters, women exhibited statistically significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD 0.25,95% CI 0.07 to 0.43), and decrement of left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.25) as compared with men. No significant difference was observed in left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.08) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.09) between men and women. CONCLUSION: Women seem to obtain greater benefits from CRT both in clinical and echocardiographic outcomes compared with men. But as this gender superiority could be observed only during long-term follow-up periods, further studies are needed to elucidate exact reasons for this phenomenon.