Histopathological evaluation of prostate specimens after thermal ablation may be confounded by the presence of thermally-fixed cells.

Purpose: Prostate cancer can be eradicated with heat exposure. However, high and rapid temperature elevations may cause thermofixation giving the appearance of viable tissue. The purpose was to characterize the immunoprofile and evaluate the viability of prostate regions with suspected thermofixation. Methods and materials: A prospective, ethics-approved and registered study (NCT03350529) enrolled six patients with MRI-visible, biopsy-concordant prostate cancer to undergo lesion-targeted MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) followed by radical prostatectomy at 3 weeks, to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of TULSA with whole-mount histology as a reference standard. If ambiguity about complete necrosis within the ablated region remained after hematoxylin-eosin staining, viability was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Treatment day MRI-thermometry and 3-week contrast-enhanced MRI post-TULSA were examined to assess ablation success and correlation with histopathology. Results: One patient presented with an apparently viable subregion inside the ablated area, surrounded by necrosis on H&E staining, located where temperature was highest on MRI-thermometry and tissues completely devascularized on MRI. Immunoprofile of the apparently viable tissue revealed changes in staining patterns suggesting thermofixation; the most significant evidence was the negative cytokeratin 8 staining detected with Cam5.2 antibody. A comprehensive literature review supports these observations of thermofixation with similar findings in prostate and other tissues. Conclusion: Thermally-fixed cells can sustain morphology on H&E staining. Misinterpretation of treatment failure may occur, if this phenomenon is not recognized and immunohistochemistry performed. Based on the previous literature and the current study, Cam5.2 staining for cytokeratin 8 appears to be a practical and reliable tool for distinguishing thermally-fixed from viable cells.

Palliative MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for symptomatic locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Locally advanced prostate cancer can cause bladder outlet obstruction, gross hematuria and frequent hospitalization. While these complications are commonly treated by palliative transurethral resection of the prostate, the improvement is often insufficient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation as an alternative palliative treatment option (pTULSA) for men suffering from symptomatic locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: This prospective, phase one study included 10 men in need of palliative surgical intervention due to urinary retention and gross hematuria caused by locally advanced prostate cancer. Patients were followed for 1 year at 3-month intervals. Time without catheter, time without hematuria, reduction in hospitalization time, and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: Ten patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were enrolled, all having continuous catheterization due to urinary retention and nine had gross hematuria before treatment. At 1 week post-pTULSA five patients were catheter-free. At last follow-up catheter-free and gross hematuria-free rates were 70% and 100%, respectively. Average hospitalization time from local complications reduced from 7.3 to 1.4 days in the 6 months before and after pTULSA. No > Grade 2 treatment related adverse events were reported, with all five being urinary tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: pTULSA appears safe and feasible for palliative ablation of locally advanced prostate cancer. The therapy seems to accomplish long-term hematuria control, can relieve bladder outlet obstruction in selected patients, and seems to reduce the burden of hospitalization due to local complications. Trial Registration Number: NCT03350529.