Comparative efficacy of prolonged-release melatonin versus clonazepam for isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.

PURPOSE: Clonazepam and melatonin are recommended as first-line treatments for isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). This study aimed to compare their efficacy and safety in REM sleep without atonia (RWA) and RBD-related symptoms. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized trial included patients with video-polysomnography-confirmed iRBD. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either clonazepam 0.5 mg or prolonged-release (PR) melatonin 2 mg 30 min before bedtime for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in RWA on follow-up polysomnography (PSG). Secondary endpoints were changes in other PSG parameters, clinical global improvement-impression scale (CGI-I) scores, and sleep questionnaire scores. The safety endpoint was adverse events. RESULTS: Of 40 patients with probable RBD considered, 34 were enrolled in the study and randomized. Visual scoring parameters of RWA indices were reduced, and automatic scoring parameters tended to be improved after clonazepam treatment but not after PR melatonin treatment. The proportion of N2 sleep was increased, and N3 and REM sleep were decreased only in the clonazepam group. The clonazepam group tended to answer "much or very much improvement" on the CGI-I more frequently than the PR melatonin group (p = 0.068). Daytime sleepiness and insomnia symptoms were reduced after PR melatonin but not after clonazepam. Depressive symptoms increased after clonazepam. Four of the patients (13.3%) reported mild to moderate adverse events, which were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Four weeks of clonazepam, but not PR melatonin, improved RWA. RBD symptom improvement tended to be better after clonazepam than PR melatonin in exchange for increased depressive symptoms and daytime sleepiness. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT03255642 (first submitted August 21, 2017).

Chronic Hypoxemia Triggers a Neuropathic Process in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Insight From In Vivo Neurophysiological Assessments.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Peripheral neuropathies (PNs) are a common but poorly understood complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To clarify the initial trigger of a PN in COPD, we investigated the excitability of peripheral nerves in patients with COPD. METHODS: The automated nerve excitability test (NET) using the threshold-tracking paradigm was applied to 20 COPD patients. The recording protocol calculated the strength-duration time constant, threshold electrotonus (TE), current-threshold relationship, and recovery cycle (RC). Each NET parameter was compared with two control groups: normal controls group (NC group) and smokers without COPD group (smoker group). RESULTS: In the motor NETs, the change in the threshold in the mid-depolarizing phase of TE (40-60 ms) was smaller in the COPD group (50.7%±1.2%, mean±SEM; n=20) than in the NC group (54.5%±0.7%, n=25; p<0.01), as was the prominence of superexcitability in the RC (-22.6%±1.5% and -26.4%±1.1%, respectively; p=0.04). There were no significant differences in the sensory NETs. Comparisons between the COPD and smoker groups (n=25) also showed no differences in either the motor or sensory NETs. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of excitability in COPD revealed a membrane depolarization attributable to Na+-K+-ATPase failure in the axolemma of distal motor nerves. This finding suggests that chronic hypoxemia and adaptative process can alter axonal excitability and trigger a resultant neuropathic process that is antecedent to PN in COPD.