Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(1): e13-e21, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509437

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify populations of authors who post about cochlear implants (CIs) on Instagram and TikTok, to illustrate the content of these posts, and to elucidate factors that might help surgeons better educate CI patients. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Instagram and TikTok social media platforms. PATIENTS: All public social media posts identified with the search terms below. Posts were excluded if unrelated to CIs or if written in a non-English language. INTERVENTION: Instagram and TikTok were searched for posts from March 2021 through September 2021 with the search terms #cochlearimplant, #cochlearimplants, #cochlearimplantkids, #cochlearkids, and #cochlearfamily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Posts were subclassified and analyzed for content including topics of posts, authorship, timeframe of posts, depiction of CIs, and popularity. RESULTS: Of 1,942 posts included in the final analysis, 1,400 were found on Instagram and 542 on TikTok. Authors were mostly patients (n = 771, 39.7%), companies (n = 568, 29.2%), and patients' family members (n = 482, 24.8%). Only 21 posts were made by physicians (1.1%). Out of 379 total educational posts examined, patients themselves were the most common authors (n = 219, 57.8%) followed by patients' family members (n = 139, 36.7%). Physicians authored only a small fraction of all educational posts (n = 19, 5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed minimal physician involvement in the CI social media spheres of Instagram and TikTok. In addition, there were few educational posts on either platform, revealing ample opportunity for physicians to become more involved with CI social media.


Assuntos
Mídias Sociais , Cirurgiões , Humanos
2.
OTO Open ; 6(1): 2473974X221086964, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35387357

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the popular social media platforms Instagram and Facebook for public posts related to tympanostomy tubes in children, to discern attitudes and perceptions surrounding tympanostomy tubes, and to evaluate the content of social media posts related to tympanostomy tubes. Study Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Instagram and Facebook social media platforms. Methods: Instagram and Facebook were searched for public posts from 2018 and 2019 including the search terms "ear tubes,""ear tube surgery,""tympanostomy," and "myringotomy." Posts were excluded if they were unrelated to pediatric tympanostomy tubes or written in a non-English language. Relevant posts underwent subgroup analysis based on 6 domains: media type, perspective, topic, timeframe, popularity, and overall tone. Results: Of 1862 public social media posts, the majority (78.2%) were made by the patient's parents/caregivers and the rest by physicians (6.0%), hospitals (8.2%), and chiropractors (6.1%), with a few posts by the patients themselves (0.4%). The majority (79.3%) of posts portrayed tympanostomy tubes positively. Most negative posts were made by chiropractors (50.8%) and the patient's parents/caregivers (42.9%). The most common themes of posts were reassurance regarding surgery (74.9%), advertisements (12.5%), apprehension (12.4%), and education (10.3%). Conclusion: Most social media posts were made by parents/caregivers in the perioperative period, and there was a low percentage of educational posts. This information could be used by otolaryngologists to optimize their interactions with patients and parents and to potentially increase physician involvement and educational material related to tympanostomy tubes on social media.

3.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 60(4): 841-63, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23905823

RESUMO

Cochlear implantation is a revolutionary yet time-sensitive treatment for deaf children that must be performed within a critical window of time, in early life, for a congenitally deafened child to receive maximum benefit. Potential candidates should therefore be referred for evaluation early. Primary reasons for delay of cochlear implantation include slow referrals for care, parental delays, and payer delays. It is vital that all newborn children undergo hearing screening to identify deaf children at birth, and for parents, health care providers, and health care payers to be educated about the indications, important benefits, and reasonable risks of cochlear implantation for deaf children.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/congênito , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 29(8): 1115-9, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18833013

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. PATIENTS: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. INTERVENTION: Implantation with the Baha system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. RESULTS: : In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. CONCLUSION: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Auxiliares de Audição , Satisfação do Paciente , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Osso Temporal/cirurgia , Surdez/cirurgia , Auxiliares de Audição/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Perda Auditiva Condutiva/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Condutiva/cirurgia , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/cirurgia , Humanos , Otosclerose/complicações , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA