Concurrent fatty liver increases risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Concurrent fatty liver in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients without significant alcohol intake is a frequent and increasingly alarming problem because of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pandemic. The risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development was increased by concomitant obesity and diabetes. Direct evidence of the hepatocarcinogenic effect of fatty liver in chronic HBV remains elusive. We aimed to evaluate the risk of concurrent histologically proven fatty liver in HBV hepatocarcinogenesis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on a liver biopsy cohort of HBV-infected patients without significant alcohol intake to evaluate the prevalence of concurrent histologically proven fatty liver and its association with subsequent HCC development. We also examined nine polymorphisms on six non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related candidate genes (ADIPOQ, APOC3, GCKR, LEPR, PNPLA3, and PPARG). RESULTS: Among 270 HBV-infected patients, concurrent fatty liver was found in 107 patients (39.6%) and was associated with metabolic risks, cirrhosis (P = 0.016) and PNPLA3 rs738409 CG/GG genotype (P = 0.002). At a median follow-up of 79.9 months, 11 patients (4.1%) developed HCC, and nine of them had concurrent fatty liver. By multivariable Cox analysis, concurrent fatty liver (HR 7.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-34.76; P = 0.013), age, cirrhosis, and APOC3 rs2854116 TC/CC genotype (HR 3.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-11.84; P = 0.013) were independent factors predicting HCC development. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent fatty liver is common in HBV-infected patients and an independent risk factor potentiating HBV-associated HCC development by 7.3-fold. The risk of HBV-related HCC is increased by APOC3 gene polymorphism, and further characterization is required by its role.

Steatotic hepatocellular carcinoma: a variant associated with metabolic factors and late tumour relapse.

AIMS: Steatosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been recognized for decades and found most commonly in small, well-differentiated HCC. However, the clinicopathological features and pathogenesis of HCC with steatosis is not well characterized. There are few data concerning whether HCC with steatosis should be regarded a distinct histological variant, steatotic HCC. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort of 516 patients undergoing curative surgery for primary HCC was recruited. The median follow-up was 45.5 (range: 0.2-166.0) months. Steatotic HCC was defined as HCC with significant steatosis (≥5% of tumour cells). Associations with immunohistochemical expression of fatty acid binding protein-1 (FABP1), sonic hedgehog (SHH) and gene polymorphism of patatin-like phospholipase 3 (PNPLA3) were analysed. Steatotic HCC was found in 21.1% of patients and was associated with higher metabolic risks [diabetes mellitus (36.7% versus 18.2%) and hypertension (44.0% versus 28.7%)], underlying fatty liver (60.6% versus 37.8%), steatohepatitis (30.3% versus 13.0%), smaller tumour size, lower frequency of major vessel (1.8% versus 11.3%) and microvascular invasion (20.2% versus 32.4%), earlier tumour stages and lower serum alpha-fetoprotein. It was associated with developing late tumour relapse (hazard ratio 2.15, P = 0.002) independently of underlying cirrhosis and non-anatomical excision. Steatotic HCC did not differ from HCC without significant steatosis in immunohistochemical expression of FABP1 and SHH and PNPLA3 gene polymorphism. CONCLUSION: Steatotic HCC is a common histological variant of HCC with distinct association with underlying fatty liver, steatohepatitis and metabolic risks. Despite more favourable baseline tumour features, it was associated with late tumour relapse.