Multiple Calcium Channel Types with Unique Expression Patterns Mediate Retinal Signaling at Bipolar Cell Ribbon Synapses.

Retinal bipolar cells (BCs) compose the canonical vertical excitatory pathway that conveys photoreceptor output to inner retinal neurons. Although synaptic transmission from BC terminals is thought to rely almost exclusively on Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels mediating L-type currents, the molecular identity of CaV channels in BCs is uncertain. Therefore, we combined molecular and functional analyses to determine the expression profiles of CaV α1, ß, and α2δ subunits in mouse rod bipolar (RB) cells, BCs from which the dynamics of synaptic transmission are relatively well-characterized. We found significant heterogeneity in CaV subunit expression within the RB population from mice of either sex, and significantly, we discovered that transmission from RB synapses was mediated by Ca2+ influx through P/Q-type (CaV2.1) and N-type (CaV2.2) conductances as well as the previously-described L-type (CaV1) and T-type (CaV3) conductances. Furthermore, we found both CaV1.3 and CaV1.4 proteins located near presynaptic ribbon-type active zones in RB axon terminals, indicating that the L-type conductance is mediated by multiple CaV1 subtypes. Similarly, CaV3 α1, ß, and α2δ subunits also appear to obey a "multisubtype" rule, i.e., we observed a combination of multiple subtypes, rather than a single subtype as previously thought, for each CaV subunit in individual cells.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Bipolar cells (BCs) transmit photoreceptor output to inner retinal neurons. Although synaptic transmission from BC terminals is thought to rely almost exclusively on Ca2+ influx through L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels, the molecular identity of CaV channels in BCs is uncertain. Here, we report unexpectedly high molecular diversity of CaV subunits in BCs. Transmission from rod bipolar (RB) cell synapses can be mediated by Ca2+ influx through P/Q-type (CaV2.1) and N-type (CaV2.2) conductances as well as the previously-described L-type (CaV1) and T-type (CaV3) conductances. Furthermore, CaV1, CaV3, ß, and α2δ subunits appear to obey a "multisubtype" rule, i.e., a combination of multiple subtypes for each subunit in individual cells, rather than a single subtype as previously thought.

Comprehensive characterization of a subfamily of Ca2+-binding proteins in mouse and human retinal neurons at single-cell resolution.

Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBPs; CaBP1-5) are a subfamily of neuronal Ca2+ sensors with high homology to calmodulin. Notably, CaBP4, which is exclusively expressed in rod and cone photoreceptors, is crucial for maintaining normal retinal functions. However, the functional roles of CaBP1, CaBP2, and CaBP5 in the retina remain elusive, primarily due to limited understanding of their expression patterns within inner retinal neurons. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive transcript analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing datasets to investigate the gene expression profiles of CaBPs in mouse and human retinal neurons. Our findings revealed notable similarities in the overall expression patterns of CaBPs across both species. Specifically, nearly all amacrine cell, ganglion cell, and horizontal cell types exclusively expressed CaBP1. In contrast, the majority of bipolar cell types, including rod bipolar (RB) cells, expressed distinct combinations of CaBP1, CaBP2, and CaBP5, rather than a single CaBP as previously hypothesized. Remarkably, mouse rods and human cones exclusively expressed CaBP4, whereas mouse cones and human rods co-expressed both CaBP4 and CaBP5. Our single-cell reverse transcription PCR analysis confirmed the co-expression CaBP1 and CaBP5 in individual RBs from mice of either sex. Additionally, all three splice variants of CaBP1, primarily L-CaBP1, were detected in mouse RBs. Taken together, our study offers a comprehensive overview of the distribution of CaBPs in mouse and human retinal neurons, providing valuable insights into their roles in visual functions.Significance statement Ca2+-binding proteins (CaBPs; CaBP1-5) are a subfamily of calmodulin-like Ca2+ sensors. We investigated the gene expression patterns of CaBPs in mouse and human retinal neurons and found notable similarities across these two species. Nearly all amacrine cell, ganglion cell, and horizontal cell types expressed CaBP1, while most bipolar cell types, including rod bipolar (RB) cells, expressed various combinations of CaBP1, CaBP2, and CaBP5. Mouse rods and human cones exclusively expressed CaBP4, whereas mouse cones and human rods co-expressed CaBP4 and CaBP5. Additionally, mouse RBs co-expressed CaBP1 and CaBP5, with all three splice variants of CaBP1 being detected. Collectively, our study provides a comprehensive overview of CaBP distribution in mouse and human retinal neurons, crucial for understanding their roles in vision.

Glutamate Transporters EAAT2 and EAAT5 Differentially Shape Synaptic Transmission from Rod Bipolar Cell Terminals.

Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) control visual signal transmission in the retina by rapidly removing glutamate released from photoreceptors and bipolar cells (BCs). Although it has been reported that EAAT2 and EAAT5 are expressed at presynaptic terminals of photoreceptors and some BCs in mammals, the distinct functions of these two glutamate transporters in retinal synaptic transmission, especially at a single synapse, remain elusive. In this study, we found that EAAT2 was expressed in all BC types while coexisting with EAAT5 in rod bipolar (RB) cells and several types of cone BCs from mice of either sex. Our immunohistochemical study, together with a recently published literature (Gehlen et al., 2021), showed that EAAT2 and EAAT5 were both located in RB axon terminals near release sites. Optogenetic, electrophysiological and pharmacological analyses, however, demonstrated that EAAT2 and EAAT5 regulated neurotransmission at RB→AII amacrine cell synapses in significantly different ways: EAAT5 dramatically affected both the peak amplitude and kinetics of postsynaptic responses in AIIs, whereas EAAT2 had either relatively small or opposite effects. By contrast, blockade of EAAT1/GLAST, which was exclusively expressed in Müller cells, showed no obvious effect on AII responses, indicating that glutamate uptake by Müller cells did not influence synaptic transmission from RB terminals. Furthermore, we found that temporal resolution at RB→AII synapses was reduced substantially by blockade of EAAT5 but not EAAT2. Taken together, our work reveals the distinct functions of EAAT2 and EAAT5 in signal transmission at RB ribbon synapses.