RESUMO
Comprehensive genomic sequencing is becoming a critical component in the assessment of hematologic malignancies, with broad implications for patient management. In this context, unequivocally discriminating somatic from germline events is challenging but greatly facilitated by matched analysis of tumor:normal pairs. In contrast to solid tumors, conventional sources of normal control (peripheral blood, buccal swabs, saliva) could be highly involved by the neoplastic process, rendering them unsuitable. In this work we describe our real-world experience using cell free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from nail clippings as an alternate source of normal control, through the dedicated review of 2,610 tumor:nail pairs comprehensively sequenced by MSK-IMPACT-heme. Overall, we find nail cfDNA is a robust source of germline control for paired genomic studies. In a subset of patients, nail DNA may have tumor DNA contamination, reflecting unique attributes of the hematologic disease and transplant history. Contamination is generally low level, but significantly more common among patients with myeloid neoplasms (20.5%; 304/1482) compared to lymphoid diseases (5.4%; 61/1128) and particularly enriched in myeloproliferative neoplasms with marked myelofibrosis. When identified in patients with lymphoid and plasma-cell neoplasms, mutations commonly reflected a myeloid profile and correlated with a concurrent/evolving clonal myeloid neoplasm. For nails collected after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, donor DNA was identified in 22% (11/50). In this cohort, an association with recent history of graft-vs-host disease was identified. These findings should be considered as a potential limitation for the use of nail as normal control but could also provide important diagnostic information regarding the disease process.
RESUMO
Comprehensive molecular profiling by next generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized tumor classification and biomarker evaluation. However, routine implementation is challenged by the scant nature of diagnostic material obtained through minimally invasive procedures. Here, we describe our long-term experience in profiling cytology samples with an in-depth assessment of the performance, quality metrics, biomarker identification capabilities, and potential pitfalls. We highlight the impact of several optimization strategies to maximize performance with 4,871 prospectively sequenced clinical cytology samples tested by MSK-IMPACT™. Special emphasis is given to the use of residual supernatant cell free DNA (ScfDNA) as a valuable source of tumor DNA. Overall, cytology samples were similar in performance to surgical samples in identifying clinically relevant genomic alterations, achieving success rates up to 93% with full optimization. While cell block (CB) samples had excellent performance overall, low-level cross-contamination was identified in a small proportion of cases (4.7%), a common pitfall intrinsic to the processing of paraffin blocks, suggesting that more stringent precautions and processing modifications should be considered in quality control initiatives. By contrast ScfDNA samples had negligible contamination. Finally, ScfDNA testing exclusively used as a rescue strategy delivered successful results in 71% of cases where tumor tissue from CB was depleted.