Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample.

OBJECTIVES: Poor prognosis and lack of effective therapeutic options have made palliative care an integral part of the management of severe COVID-19. However, clinical studies on the role of palliative care in severe COVID-19 patients are lacking. The objective of our study was to evaluate the utility of palliative care in intubated COVID-19 patients and its impact on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Rate of palliative care consult, patient-level variables (age, sex, race, income, insurance type), hospital-level variables (region, type, size) and in-hospital outcome variables (mortality, cost, disposition, complications) were recorded. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 263 855 intubated COVID-19 patients using National Inpatient Sample database from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. 65 325 (24.8%) patients received palliative care consult. Factors associated with an increased rate of palliative care consults included: female gender (p<0.001), older age (p<0.001), Caucasian race (p<0.001), high household income (p<0.001), Medicare insurance (p<0.001), admission to large-teaching hospitals (p<0.001), patients with underlying comorbidities, development of in-hospital complications and the need for intensive care procedures. Patients receiving palliative consults had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.001) and no difference in hospitalisation cost (p=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care utilisation rate in intubated COVID-19 patients was reflective of disease severity and disparities in healthcare access. Palliative care may help reduce hospital LOS. Our findings also highlight importance of improving access to palliative care services and its integration into the multidisciplinary management of severe COVID-19 patients.

Comparative Outcomes of Peritoneal and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients with STEMI: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis (2016-2020).

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are at increased risk of mortality, particularly due to cardiovascular events such as acute myocardial infarction. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are the two main treatment modalities for ESRD patients. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we conducted a retrospective study involving 25,435 ESRD patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2016 and 2020, categorized by their dialysis regimen. Our analysis revealed comparable mortality rates between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients, but lower hospitalization costs and fewer complications among PD recipients. Over five years, we observed a notable decrease in STEMI mortality despite increased STEMI cases among HD patients. Conversely, HD patients experienced increased hospital stays and associated costs over the study period than PD patients, who demonstrated stable trends. This study highlights the implications of dialysis modality selection in managing costs and reducing morbidity among STEMI patients with ESRD.