The role of flexible endotherapy for the treatment of recurrent Zenker's diverticula after surgery and endoscopic stapling.

BACKGROUND: Currently there are three main treatment options for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD): surgery, rigid endoscopy and flexible endoscopy. After primary success, recurrence can be as high as 19 % for surgery, 12.8 % for rigid endoscopy and 20 % for flexible endoscopy. Flexible endoscopy may represent an ideal treatment option for recurring ZD. The aims of this paper are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible endotherapy for recurring ZD after surgery and/or endoscopic stapling and to compare the treatment outcome between naive and recurring patients. METHODS: Data on patients that underwent flexible endotherapy for ZD between January 2010 and January 2015 were collected. Patients were divided into those with recurrences after surgery and/or endoscopic stapling and those who did not have previous treatments. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptom severity before the procedure were graded. The outcome parameters were: complications, symptom improvement after the first treatment, number of treatment sessions, rate of complete remission and relapses. These parameters were then compared between patients groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five recurring patients were included. Treatment was carried out successfully in all patients. Two adverse events occurred; they were successfully managed conservatively. After the first treatment, there was a significant reduction in dysphagia, regurgitation and respiratory symptoms scores. The median number of treatments was 1 (IQR 0.25, range 1-3): symptom remission was achieved in 84 % patients and partial improvement in 16 %. Relapsing symptoms occurred in 20 % patients; they were successfully managed with an additional treatment session. Results were compared with data on 34 consecutive naive patients treated within the same time span; no differences of the outcome parameters were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endotherapy for ZD recurrences after surgery and endoscopic stapling appears to be safe and effective, and its efficacy and safety profile seems to be comparable between recurring and naive patients.

Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker's diverticulum with the SB Knife. Preliminary results from a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Flexible endoscopic septum division is becoming a prominent treatment option for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Over the years, various techniques have been developed and many cutting tools have been tested with varying results. We report our experience with a recently designed, monopolar, rotating, scissor-shaped device (SB Knife). METHODS: Data on 31 consecutive patients that underwent flexible endoscopic treatment for ZD with the use of the SB Knife were retrieved. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and respiratory symptom severity before the procedure were graded. Procedure duration, rate of complications, symptom changes after the procedure and rate of relapsing patients during follow up were recorded. RESULTS: The procedure was carried out successfully in all patients. Median procedure time was 14 min. One case of late-onset bleeding developed 1 week after the procedure, and was managed endoscopically. A significant symptom improvement was achieved (dysphagia: median score <3, median score >0, P < 0.001; regurgitation: median score <2, median score >0, P < 0.001; respiratory symptoms: median score <2, median score >0, P = 0.009). Two patients had mild relapsing symptoms, respectively, after 4 and 9 months from the procedure but refused further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of ZD using this new device is safe and efficient at short term follow up. No perforations were observed and there was a substantial reduction of symptoms after the treatment. Larger studies are needed to fully assess advantages of this new device for endoscopic treatment of ZD.

Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma risk: the experience of the North-Eastern Italian Registry (EBRA).

OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence and risk factors for progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-IEN) or Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BAc) in a prospective cohort of patients with esophageal intestinal metaplasia [(BE)]. BACKGROUND: BE is associated with an increased risk of BAc unless cases are detected early by surveillance. No consistent data are available on the prevalence of BE-related cancer, the ideal surveillance schedule, or the risk factors for cancer. METHODS: In 2003, a regional registry of BE patients was created in north-east Italy, establishing the related diagnostic criteria (endoscopic landmarks, biopsy protocol, histological classification) and timing of follow-up (tailored to histology) and recording patient outcomes. Thirteen centers were involved and audited yearly. The probability of progression to HG-IEN/BAc was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; the Cox regression model was used to calculate the risk of progression. RESULTS: HG-IEN (10 cases) and EAc (7 cases) detected at the index endoscopy or in the first year of follow-up were considered to be cases of preexisting disease and excluded; 841 patients with at least 2 endoscopies {median, 3 [interquartile range (IQR): 2-4); median follow-up = 44.6 [IQR: 24.7-60.5] months; total 3083 patient-years} formed the study group [male/female = 646/195; median age, 60 (IQR: 51-68) years]. Twenty-two patients progressed to HG-IEN or BAc (incidence: 0.72 per 100 patient-years) after a median of 40.2 (26.9-50.4) months. At multivariate analysis, endoscopic abnormalities, that is, ulceration or nodularity (P = 0.0002; relative risk [RR] = 7.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.63-21.9), LG-IEN (P = 0.02, RR = 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-11.43), and BE length (P = 0.01; RR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.30) were associated with BE progression. Among the LG-IEN patients, the incidence of HG-IEN/EAc was 3.17 patient-years, that is, 6 times higher than in BE patients without LG-IEN. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in the absence of intraepithelial neoplastic changes, BE carries a low risk of progression to HG-IEN/BAc, and strict surveillance (or ablative therapy) is advisable in cases with endoscopic abnormalities, LG-IEN or long BE segments.

Comparison of preoperative and surgical measurements of Zenker's diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) may be treated with a variety of endoscopic or open surgical techniques; the choice of treatment depends partly on the size of the diverticulum. The purpose of this study was to correlate ZD measurements obtained preoperatively and during surgery. METHODS: From March 2006 to November 2008, 20 consecutive patients (19 males; median age 64.5 (range 37-88) years) with dysphagia secondary to ZD were enrolled for this study. All patients had preoperative barium radiography of the pharynx and esophagus, and diagnostic endoscopy. Ten patients underwent transoral stapling diverticulostomy and ten had open surgery. The depth of the ZD was measured on radiographic views, at endoscopy and during surgery, focusing on the distance from the top of the septum to the bottom of the pouch. The ZD dimensions obtained radiologically and endoscopically were compared with those found during surgery. Correlations and agreements between measurements were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients and method-comparison analysis, respectively. RESULTS: The median depth of the ZD was 2.9 cm (mean 2.95 ± 1.12 cm; range 1.5-6 cm), 3.0 cm (mean 3.24 ± 1.27 cm; range 1.7-6.8 cm), and 3.0 cm (mean 2.99 ± 1.01 cm; range 1.5-6 cm) when measured during surgery, radiology, and endoscopy, respectively. The correlation and agreement between the radiographic and surgical ZD measurements were good, whereas those between the endoscopic and surgical measurements were poor. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that preoperative barium radiography is mandatory in order to choose the most appropriate surgical treatment for ZD.

Therapeutic strategies for epiphrenic diverticula: systematic review.

Most patients with epiphrenic diverticula are asymptomatic. When dysphagia or regurgitation is limited and respiratory complaints are absent, these patients usually can live with the diverticulum left in place. Fewer than one-third of the diverticula produce symptoms severe enough to seek medical attention or to warrant surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the therapeutic strategies for epiphrenic diverticula-from a nonsurgical alternative such as endoscopic dilatation for symptomatic patients unfit for surgery, to the traditional approach of surgical resection (left thoracotomy), and finally to the minimally invasive techniques (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy) used more recently. Whatever treatment and approach are used for the patient with epiphrenic diverticula, a tailored protocol always involves detailed study of the esophageal morphology and function.

Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic myotomy is the currently preferred treatment for achalasia. Our objectives were to assess the long-term outcome of this operation and preoperative factors influencing said outcome. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics and data on long-term outcome were prospectively collected on patients undergoing laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia at our institution from 1992 to 2007. Treatment failure was defined as a postoperative symptom score higher than the 10th percentile of the preoperative score (>9). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative factors associated with successful myotomy. RESULTS: Four hundred seven consecutive patients (220 men, 187 women) underwent the laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure during the study period; 89 (22%) of them had previously had endoscopic treatment(s). The mortality rate was 0; the conversion and morbidity rates were 1.5% and 1.9%, respectively. The operation failed in 10% of patients (39/407) and the 5-year actuarial probability of being asymptomatic was 87%. Most failures (25/39, 64%) occurred within 12 months of the operation and can be considered as technical failures (incomplete myotomy). Pneumatic dilation overcome the dysphagia in 75% of patients whose surgery was unsuccessful. Considering both the primary surgery and this ancillary treatment, the operation was effective in 97% of achalasia patients. The frequency of sigmoid esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressures, and chest pain scores differed statistically between patients with and without recurrences. At multivariate analysis, high preoperative LES pressures (>30 mm Hg) was an independent predictor of a good response. The presence of chest pain and of sigmoid esophagus independently predicted the failure of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myotomy can durably relieve dysphagia symptoms. High preoperative LES pressures represent the strongest predictor of a positive outcome, probably reflecting a less severely damaged esophageal muscle.

A modification of Nissen fundoplication improves patients' outcome and may reduce procedure-related failure rate.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery has a failure rate of 10-20%. We aimed to investigate whether a modification of Nissen fundoplication (MNF) may improve patients' outcome and reduce failure rate. MATERIALS & METHODS: We prospectively compared 40 consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent anti-reflux surgery: 20 Nissen fundoplication (NF) and 20 the MNF approach. Eight cases in the MNF group needed redo surgery. The MNF consisted in suturing the esophagus to the diaphragmatic crura on each side by means of 4 non-absorbable stitches and in fixing the upper stitch of the valve to diaphragm. In case of clearly weak crura, a reinforcement with Ultrapro mesh was used. All patients were assessed before and after surgery using validated symptoms and quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaires, manometry and 24-h impedance-pH monitoring, endoscopy and barium-swallow. RESULTS: Mortality and postoperative complications were nil. At a median follow-up of 36 months, no significant differences emerged between the MNF and NF group in terms of symptoms, GERD-HRQL scores, manometric findings, and impedance-pH features. Dysphagia was not reported by the MNF group, while it was quite common (20% vs.0%, p = ns) in the NF group. Anti-reflux surgery was successful in all patients in the MNF group, whereas two patients in the NF group presented a slipped wrap and one recurrent reflux; two of these cases required redo-surgery (10% vs. 0%, p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data demonstrated that the MNF is a safe and effective procedure. Further, it seems to reduce the failure rate associated to the surgical procedure.

Clinical, endoscopic, histological and radiological characteristics of Italian patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on eosinophilic oesophagitis in Italy. AIM: To evaluate typical features of eosinophilic oesophagitis patients in a tertiary centre. METHODS: 973 consecutive patients with dysphagia and/or bolus impaction were prospectively enrolled and underwent upper endoscopy for eosinophilic oesophagitis (≥15 eosinophils in at least one high-power field [hpf] and no response to acid suppressants). Demographic and multiple clinical factors were collected. RESULTS: 45 patients (80% males, mean age 35±16) with incident eosinophilic oesophagitis (mean eosinophil peak count 57.2±40.6/hpf) were enrolled. 32 patients complained of solids dysphagia (71%), and 29 of bolus impaction (64%). Endoscopy found rings in 20 (44%), furrows in 9 (20%), whitish exudates/plaques in 12 (27%), crêpe paper in 7 (13%) and normal findings in 14 patients (31%). Endoscopic and radiologic stenosis occurred in 20 (44%) and 23 (51%), respectively. Ten patients had proton pump inhibitor-oesophageal eosinophilia (22%). Topic fluticasone was effective in 28 of the remaining cases (62%), while 7 required additional treatments (16%). CONCLUSION: Eosinophilic oesophagitis prevalence was 12% in patients with dysphagia and/or bolus impaction, emphasizing the importance of this disease in Italy. Despite different environmental factors and dietary habits, Italian patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis present similar characteristics to those of other Western counties.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy can be used as primary therapy for esophageal achalasia regardless of age.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery is the current treatment of choice for patients with esophageal achalasia, but elderly patients are generally referred for less invasive treatments (pneumatic dilations or botulinum toxin injections). AIM: To assess the effect of age on the surgical outcome of patients receiving laparoscopic Heller-Dor as primary treatment. METHODS: Demographic and clinical findings were prospectively collected on patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller-Dor from 1992 to 2012. Patients were classified in three age brackets: group A (≤45 years), group B (45-70), and group C (≥70). Treatment was defined as a failure if the postoperative symptom score was >10th percentile of the preoperative score (i.e., >8). We consecutively performed the Heller-Dor in 571 achalasia patients, 305 (53.4 %) in group A, 226 (39.6 %) in group B, and 40 (7 %) in group C. RESULTS: The mortality was nil; the conversion and morbidity rates were both 1.1 %. Group C patients had higher preoperative symptom scores (p = 0.02), while the symptom duration was similar in all three groups. Mucosal tears occurred in 17 patients (3 %): 6 (2 %) in group A, 8 (3.5 %) in group B, and 3 (7.5 %) in group C (p = 0.09). The postoperative hospital stay was slightly longer for group C (p = 0.06). DISCUSSION: The treatment failure rate was quite similar: 31 failures in group A (10.1 %), 19 in group B (8.4 %), and 3 in group C (7.5 %; p = 0.80). These failures were seen more in manometric pattern III (22.2 %, p = 0.002). Laparoscopic Heller-Dor can be used as the first therapeutic approach to achalasia even in elderly patients with an acceptable surgical risk.

Laparoscopic repair of epiphrenic diverticulum.

Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) are a rare clinical entity characterized by out-pouchings of the esophageal mucosa originating in the distal third of the esophagus, close to the diaphragm. The proportion of diverticula reported symptomatic enough to warrant surgery is extremely variable, ranging from 0% to 40%. The natural history of ED is still almost unknown and the most intriguing question concerns whether or not they all need surgical treatment. From 1993 to 2010 35 patients underwent surgery at our institution. Eleven patients were treated via a thoracotomic approach alone and were excluded from present study. The remaining 24 patients formed our study population. Seventeen patients (48.6%) underwent surgery via a purely laparoscopic approach, and received a diverticulectomy + myotomy + antireflux procedure. Seven patients (23%), with ED positioned well above inferior pulmonary vein, were treated via a combined laparoscopic-thoracotomic approach: they all underwent diverticulectomy + myotomy + an antireflux procedure. Mortality was nil. The overall morbidity rate was 25%. A suture leakage occurred in 4 patients (16.6%) and they were all conservatively treated. Patients' symptom scores decreased from a median of 15 to 0 (P = 0.0005). Laparoscopic surgery for ED is effective, but given the not negligible incidence of complications such suture-line leakage, should be considered only in symptomatic patients or in event of huge diverticula. A tailored combined laparoscopic-thoracotomic approach may be useful in case of ED located high in mediastinum or with large neck.

Long-term follow-up of Barrett's epithelium: medical versus antireflux surgical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the most serious complication of GERD. In BE patients, this observational study compares the effects of antireflux surgery versus antisecretory medical therapy. METHODS: Overall, 89 BE patients (long BE = 45; short BE = 44) were considered: 45 patients underwent antireflux surgery and 44 underwent medical therapy. At both initial and follow-up endoscopy, symptoms were assessed using a detailed questionnaire; BE phenotypic changes [intestinal metaplasia (IM) presence/type, Cdx2 expression] were assessed by histology (H&E), histochemistry (HID), and immunohistochemistry. Surgical failures were defined as follows: (1) abnormal 24-h pH monitoring results after surgery, (2) endoscopically evident recurrent esophagitis, and (3) recurrent hiatal hernia or slipped fundoplication on endoscopy or barium swallow. RESULTS: Reversion of IM was observed in 12/44 SSBE and 0/45 LSBE patients (p < 0.01). Reversion was more frequently observed after effective antireflux surgery than after medical treatment (p = 0.04). In patients with no further evidence of IM after therapy, Cdx2 expression was also absent (p = 0.02). The extent of IM was reduced, and the IM phenotype improved in SSBE patients after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with short BE (but not those with long BE) may benefit from surgically reducing the esophagus' exposure to GE reflux; among these patients, successful surgery carries a higher IM reversion rate than medical treatment.

The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: A new manometric classification of esophageal achalasia has recently been proposed that also suggests a correlation with the final outcome of treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate this hypothesis in a large group of achalasia patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy. METHODS: We evaluated 246 consecutive achalasia patients who underwent surgery as their first treatment from 2001 to 2009. Patients with sigmoid-shaped esophagus were excluded. Symptoms were scored and barium swallow X-ray, endoscopy, and esophageal manometry were performed before and again at 6 months after surgery. Patients were divided into three groups: (I) no distal esophageal pressurization (contraction wave amplitude <30 mmHg); (II) rapidly propagating compartmentalized pressurization (panesophageal pressurization >30 mmHg); and (III) rapidly propagating pressurization attributable to spastic contractions. Treatment failure was defined as a postoperative symptom score greater than the 10th percentile of the preoperative score (i.e., >7). RESULTS: Type III achalasia coincided with a longer overall lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, a lower symptom score, and a smaller esophageal diameter. Treatment failure rates differed significantly in the three groups: I = 14.6% (14/96), II = 4.7% (6/127), and III = 30.4% (7/23; p = 0.0007). At univariate analysis, the manometric pattern, a low LES resting pressure, and a high chest pain score were the only factors predicting treatment failure. At multivariate analysis, the manometric pattern and a LES resting pressure <30 mmHg predicted a negative outcome. CONCLUSION: This is the first study by a surgical group to assess the outcome of surgery in 3 manometric achalasia subtypes: patients with panesophageal pressurization have the best outcome after laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy.

Zenker's diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size.

BACKGROUND: Zenker's diverticula (ZD) can be treated by transoral diverticulostomy or open surgery (upper esophageal sphincter myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a minimally invasive (group A) versus a traditional open surgical approach (group B) in the treatment of ZD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1993 and September 2007, 128 ZD patients underwent transoral diverticulostomy (n = 51) or cricopharyngeal myotomy and diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy (n = 77). All patients were evaluated for symptoms using a detailed questionnaire. Manometry recorded upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, relaxations, and intrabolus pharyngeal pressure. The size of the pouch was measured on the barium swallow. The choice of treatment was based on the size of the diverticulum and the patients' preference. Long-term follow-up data were available for 121/128 (94.5%) patients with a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range, 17-83). RESULTS: Mortality was nil. Three patients in group A (5.8%) and ten in group B (13%) had postoperative complications (p = n.s.). Hospital stays were markedly shorter for patients after diverticulostomy (p < 0.01). Postoperative manometry showed a reduction in UES pressure, improved UES relaxation, and lower intrabolus pressure in both groups (p < 0.05). Four patients in the open surgery group (5.2%) complained of severe dysphagia after surgery (three of them required endoscopic dilations). In the transoral diverticulostomy group, 11 patients (21.5%) required additional septal reduction (n = 8) or a surgical myotomy (n = 3) for persistent symptoms (p < 0.01); nine of these 11 patients had a ZD < or = 3 cm in size. After primary and complementary treatments, symptoms disappeared or improved significantly at long-term follow-up in 93.5% of patients in group A and 96% of those in group B. CONCLUSION: Diverticulostomy is safe, quick, and effective for most patients with medium-sized ZD, but open surgery offers better long-term results as a primary treatment and should be recommended for younger, healthy patients, especially those with small diverticula. Small ZD may represent a formal contraindication to the transoral approach because an excessively short septum prevents a complete division of the sphincter fibers.