[Clinical effect of exogenous pulmonary surfactant in the treatment of severe neonatal infectious pneumonia: a multicenter prospective clinical trial].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effect of calsurf, a domestic exogenous pulmonary surfactant, in the treatment of severe neonatal infectious pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 208 neonates with severe infectious pneumonia who hospitalized in 5 hospitals of China were enrolled. According to their parents' wishes on admission, these neonates were administered with conventional treatment (control group; n=81) and calsurf treatment + conventional treatment (calsurf treatment group, n=127). The two groups were compared in terms of the degree of oxygen dependence on admission, blood gas parameters before and after treatment, lung ultrasound results, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, complications and prognosis. RESULTS: Compared with the control group on admission, the calsurf treatment group had significantly higher inhaled oxygen concentration and partial pressure of carbon dioxide and significantly lower arterial partial pressure of oxygen and oxygenation index (P<0.01). After 1 hour of treatment, both groups had significant improvements in the above indices (P<0.05), and the improvements were more significant in the calsurf treatment group (P<0.05). After 4-6 hours of calsurf administration, there was a significant reduction in the degree of pulmonary consolidation. The calsurf treatment group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay than the control group, while there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of complications between the two groups. The neonates of both groups had a good prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: In neonates with severe infectious pneumonia, calsurf treatment can significantly improve oxygenation, reduce the degree of pulmonary consolidation, and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay. Therefore, it should be considered in neonates with severe infectious pneumonia.

The Utility of Peripheral Blood Leucocyte Ratios as Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Early stage diagnosis of neonatal sepsis (NS) remains a major roadblock due to non-specific symptoms and the absence of precise laboratory index tests. The full blood count is a relatively cheap, universal, and rapid diagnostic test. Method: This study assessed the diagnostic accuracies of immature-to-total neutrophil ratio (ITR), immature-to-mature neutrophil ratio (IMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) used in the diagnosis of NS. Included studies were retrieved by searching four major databases and relevant references, and reviewed based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated, I 2 was utilized to test for heterogeneity, and the source was investigated via meta-regression analysis. Results: Finally, 38 studies passed the eligibility criteria. A total of thirty-one studies (6,221 neonates) included data on the ITR, eight studies (1,230 neonates) included data on the IMR, seven studies (751 neonates) included data on the NLR, and two studies (283 neonates) included data on the PLR. The summary sensitivity estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were, respectively, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.78), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.55-1.00). The summary specificity values for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.79), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the ITR, IMR, and NLR tests were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79). The PLR could not be evaluated because only two studies included pertinent data. Conclusion: The NLR test might not be sufficiently accurate in precisely diagnosing NS. The ITR and IMR tests alone can improve the accuracy of NS diagnosis, but the marked heterogeneity and the limited number of studies prevented us from reaching any definitive conclusions. Thus, further studies are warranted to validate these findings. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021247850].