Screening for colorectal cancer by full colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: a multicentric study by the Italian League for the Fight against Cancer.

Background: Colorectal cancer currently presents the third-highest incidence of cancers worldwide, making secondary prevention through screening programs for colorectal cancer, usually by Fecal Occult Blood Testing, an essential preventive medicine intervention. First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients are a particularly at-risk group, with indications to consider direct screening by full colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing colorectal cancer, as it has high sensitivity and specificity, and is both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. However, it requires significant organizational and financial resources, and has a small but relatively higher risk of complications as opposed to fecal occult blood testing. The present study aimed to assess the appropriateness of a screening program without age restrictions of CRC by full colonoscopy in asymptomatic, first-degree adult relatives of patients with colorectal cancer, aiming both to actively increase screening coverage and to determine the detection rate of precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer in this population. Study Design: Uncontrolled interventional study - colorectal cancer screening by full colonoscopy for at-risk population. Methods: The Italian League for the Fight against Cancer started a colorectal cancer screening program by full colonoscopy for first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in 1998 in the province of Latina, Lazio Region, Italy. The program was expanded to the provinces of Rieti, Lazio Region, and Sassari, Sardinia Region, in 2014 and 2016 respectively, and was concluded in 2018. Subjects were actively and voluntarily recruited by the study's working group. Subjects that had already been subjected to a full colonoscopy in the preceding 5 years were excluded from this study. Identified neoplastic lesions were treated either directly or referred to the Day Hospital setting, and histologically diagnosed following World Health Organization guidelines. Results: In total, 2,288 subjects (age range 15-88, mean 52.3 yrs, M/F = 946/1,204) were screened by colonoscopy, of which 103 (4.5%) were incomplete and 2,173 (95.0%) complete, with data on colonoscopy performance missing for 12 participants. Out of 468 positive outcomes on colonoscopy, diagnosis for 422 (204M/173F), 19.4% of total subjects, was adenomatous polyps and 46 (20M/20F), 2.1% of total subjects, was colorectal cancer. Female sex was a protective factor against a positive test outcome, with a 35% reduction compared to male sex, with OR=0.64 95%CI (0.52-0.80). On the other hand, being over 50 years of age was found to be a risk factor, making a positive outcome more than twice as likely, with OR=2.3 95%CI (1.8-2.9). Subjects over 50 also had significantly more instances of multiple adenomas being found, however the size distribution of found adenomas was not significantly different between subjects under and over 50, despite size being a predictor of risk of neoplastic progression. Conclusions: Given the high detection rate of precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer in the studied population, it is our opinion that guidelines should continue to recommend earlier and more frequent screening in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer, and, barring the introduction of more cost-effective and/or lower risk procedures with a similar efficacy profile, maintain the use of colonoscopy as the main screening option.

Venous endotelin-1 (ET-1) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) plasma levels during 6-month bosentan treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Bosentan, an endothelin (ET) ETA-ETB receptors antagonist, is an effective therapy for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and for PAH related to connective tissue disease (CTD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the behaviour of ET-1 and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) venous plasma levels during a 6-month dual ET-1 receptor blockade and the potential influence of baseline ET-1 venous plasma levels on the clinical efficacy of bosentan. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients with PAH (idiopathic n=16, CTD n=9) in WHO functional class II-III were included in this study. After initial evaluation, patients' WHO class, 6-minute walking-test (6MWT), ET-1 and BNP venous plasma levels were assessed at baseline and after 6-month bosentan therapy. To evaluate whether the ET-1 levels could influence the clinical response to bosentan, data were analyzed for the whole population which was stratified according to high and low ET-1 plasma levels (on the basis of the baseline median value of ET-1 plasma: Gr.1<18.7 pg/ml, Gr.2>18.7 pg/ml). RESULTS: Study population included patients with moderate-severe PAH. After 6-month of treatment we observed a significant increase in 6MWT distance (from 435+/-85) m to 467+/-77 m, p>0.001) and an improvement in WHO class (from 2.4+/-0.5 to 2+/-0.6 p>0.01), with a significant decrease in BNP (from 87+/-33 pg/ml to 67+/-41 pg/ml, p=0.006) and a trend towards lower ET-1 plasma levels (from 17.7+/-5 pg/ml to 16+/-6 pg/ml, p=ns). Improvement in effort tolerance (Delta distance) was not correlated to modification in ET-1 (DeltaET-1) and BNP (DeltaBNP) plasma levels, while we found a significant correlation between DeltaET-1 and DeltaBNP (r=0.63, p=0.0006). Analyzing the subpopulation, Gr.2 patients were older (Gr.1: 41+/-10 years vs Gr.2: 50+/-9 years, p=0.04), had less effort capacity (6MWT distance, Gr.1: 469+/-76 m, vs Gr.2: 398+/-82 m, p=0.03), and showed a trend towards higher BNP values (Gr.1: 82+/-41 pg/ml vs Gr.2: 92+/-23 pg/ml, p=0.051), but no significant differences in pulmonary hemodynamics. After the 6-month treatment both groups showed a significant improvement in 6MWT (Gr.1: +32+/-24 m, Gr.2: +32+/-21 m p=0.05) without differences between groups. WHO class had a trend towards lower class (Gr.1: -0.5+/-0.5, Gr.2: -0.3+/-0.4 p=0.15) in both groups. BNP plasma levels showed a significant decrease only in Gr.2 (Gr.1: -6+/-41 pg/ml, Gr.2: -34+/-19 pg/ml p=0.02); similarly ET-1 plasma levels showed a trend towards a decrease only in Gr.2 (Gr.1: 0.2+/-4.6 pg/ml, Gr.2: -3.8+/-6.6 pg/ml p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that bosentan is an effective therapy for patients with PAH. Its clinical efficacy (effort tolerance and NYHA) seems to be independent from baseline venous ET1 plasma levels. Bosentan therapy seems to elicit different patterns in ET-1 and BNP plasma levels, with decrease of the peptides only in patients with higher activation of the systemic endothelin system. Further studies are warranted to explore the potential impact of baseline ET-1 levels on the long-term effects (clinical worsening) of bosentan therapy.