Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias.

OBJECTIVES: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in enhancing motor recovery after stroke, but nuances regarding its use, such as the impact of the type and site of stimulation, are not yet established. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias to investigate the effect of rTMS on motor recovery after both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases were searched systematically for all RCTs reporting comparisons between rTMS (including theta-burst stimulation) and either no stimulation or sham stimulation up to August 19, 2022. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcome measures comprised the Action Research Arm Test, Box and Block Test, Modified Ashworth Scale for the wrist, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: A total of 37 articles reporting 48 unique comparisons were included. Pooled mean FMA-UE scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than the control group after intervention (MD = 5.4 [MD = 10.7 after correction of potential publication bias], p < 0.001) and at the last follow-up (MD = 5.2, p = 0.031). On subgroup analysis, the improvements in FMA-UE scores, both after intervention and at the last follow-up, were significant in the acute/subacute stage of stroke (within six months) and for patients with more severe baseline motor impairment. Both contralesional and ipsilesional stimulation yielded significant improvements in FMA-UE at the first assessment after rTMS but not at the last follow-up, while the improvements from bilateral rTMS only achieved statistical significance at the last follow-up. Among the secondary outcome measures, only mRS was significantly improved in the rTMS group after intervention (MD = -0.5, p = 0.013) and at the last follow-up (MD = -0.9, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current literature supports the use of rTMS for motor recovery after stroke, especially when done within six months and for patients with more severe stroke at baseline. Future studies with larger sample sizes may be helpful in clarifying the potential of rTMS in poststroke rehabilitation.

Surgical revascularizations for pediatric moyamoya: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is no clear consensus regarding the technique of surgical revascularization for moyamoya disease and syndrome (MMD/MMS) in the pediatric population. Previous meta-analyses have attempted to address this gap in literature but with methodological limitations that affect the reliability of their pooled estimates. This meta-analysis aimed to report an accurate and transparent comparison between studies of indirect (IB), direct (DB), and combined bypasses (CB) in pediatric patients with MMD/MMS. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to 7 October 2022. Perioperative adverse events were the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were rates of long-term revascularization, stroke recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies reporting 2460 patients and 4432 hemispheres were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled mean age was 8.6 years (95% CI: 7.7; 9.5), and 45.0% were male. Pooled proportions of perioperative adverse events were similar between the DB/CB and IB groups except for wound complication which was higher in the former group (RR = 2.54 (95% CI: 1.82; 3.55)). Proportions of post-surgical Matsushima Grade A/B revascularization favored DB/CB over IB (RR = 1.12 (95% CI 1.02; 1.24)). There was no significant difference in stroke recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. After meta-regression analysis, year of publication and age were significant predictors of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: IB, DB/CB are relatively effective and safe revascularization options for pediatric MMD/MMS. Low-quality GRADE evidence suggests that DB/CB was associated with better long-term angiographic revascularization outcomes when compared with IB, although this did not translate to long-term stroke and mortality benefits.

Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Markov Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may improve clinical outcomes for patients who have end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. However, the costs of rTKA are high, and there is a paucity of data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of rTKA. We aimed to analyze the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of rTKA relative to manual TKA. METHODS: A Markov decision analysis was performed using known parameters for costs, outcomes, implant survivorships, and mortalities. The cost-effectiveness of rTKA relative to manual TKA was assessed for end-stage knee osteoarthritis patients who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 27 to 94 years). The rTKA costs were calculated for a pay-per-use contract robot. RESULTS: Using the Markov Model with an annual case volume of 500 patients and a mean age of 65 years, the overall health gain per patient was 13.34 QALYs after rTKA and 13.31 QALYs after manual TKA. This resulted in an overall gain in QALYs of 0.03 for each patient undergoing an rTKA compared with manual TKA and an incremental cost of $128,526 Singapore Dollars per QALY. CONCLUSION: Robotic TKA is not a cost-effective alternative to conventional TKA using a pay-per-use contract robot.

The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions.

Treatment techniques and management guidelines for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) have been continually developing and this rapid development has altered treatment decision-making for clinicians. IAs are treated in one of two ways: surgical treatments such as microsurgical clipping with or without bypass techniques, and endovascular methods such as coiling, balloon- or stent-assisted coiling, or intravascular flow diversion and intrasaccular flow disruption. In certain cases, a single approach may be inadequate in completely resolving the IA and successful treatment requires a combination of microsurgical and endovascular techniques, such as in complex aneurysms. The treatment option should be considered based on factors such as age; past medical history; comorbidities; patient preference; aneurysm characteristics such as location, morphology, and size; and finally the operator's experience. The purpose of this review is to provide practicing neurosurgeons with a summary of the techniques available, and to aid decision-making by highlighting ideal or less ideal cases for a given technique. Next, we illustrate the evolution of techniques to overcome the shortfalls of preceding techniques. At the outset, we emphasize that this decision-making process is dynamic and will be directed by current best scientific evidence, and future technological advances.

Encephalitis as a neurological complication of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, outcomes, and predictors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although COVID-19 predominantly affects the respiratory system, recent studies have reported the occurrence of neurological disorders such as stroke in relation to COVID-19 infection. Encephalitis is an inflammatory condition of the brain that has been described as a severe neurological complication of COVID-19. Despite a growing number of reported cases, encephalitis related to COVID-19 infection has not been adequately characterised. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to describe the incidence, clinical course, and outcomes of patients who suffer from encephalitis as a complication of COVID-19. METHODS: All studies published between 1 November 2019 and 24 October 2020 that reported on patients who developed encephalitis as a complication of COVID-19 were included. Only cases with radiological and/or biochemical evidence of encephalitis were included. RESULTS: In this study, 610 studies were screened and 23 studies reporting findings from 129,008 patients, including 138 with encephalitis, were included. The average time from diagnosis of COVID-19 to onset of encephalitis was 14.5 days (range = 10.8-18.2 days). The average incidence of encephalitis as a complication of COVID-19 was 0.215% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.056%-0.441%). The average mortality rate of encephalitis in COVID-19 patients was 13.4% (95% CI = 3.8%-25.9%). These patients also had deranged clinical parameters, including raised serum inflammatory markers and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although encephalitis is an uncommon complication of COVID-19, when present, it results in significant morbidity and mortality. Severely ill COVID-19 patients are at higher risk of suffering from encephalitis as a complication of the infection.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently utilized as a salvage therapy for patients with cardiopulmonary failure, outcomes of its use in peripartum patients have not been clearly established. We aimed to review peer-reviewed publications on the use of ECMO in pregnant and postpartum patients, with analyses of maternal and fetal outcomes. METHODS: Data were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from 1972 up to November 2017 for publications on ECMO in peripartum patients. Search terms included "ECMO," "ECLS,", "pregnancy," "postpartum," and "peripartum." Publications with 3 or more patients were reviewed for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for prevalence studies and case series. RESULTS: After reviewing 143 publications, 9 observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence of maternal survival was 77.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.1%-88.4%). Pooled prevalence of fetal survival was 69.1% (95% CI: 44.7%-89.8%). The level of heterogeneity across studies was low for both outcomes. Meta-regression did not reveal any correlation between pregnant women with pulmonary or cardiac indications and maternal survival. Individual patient data meta-regression demonstrated higher odds of survival for patients on venovenous ECMO compared to those on venoarterial ECMO that was close to statistical significance (odds ratio = 3.016, 95% CI: 0.901-11.144; P = .081) after adjusting for pregnancy status. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be considered as an acceptable salvage therapy for pregnant and postpartum patients with critical cardiac or pulmonary illness.

Radiological surveillance of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 8428 aneurysms.

With the widespread use of imaging techniques, the possibility that an asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) is detected has increased significantly. There is no established consensus regarding follow-up, duration, and frequency of such imaging surveillance. The objectives of this study include assessing the growth rate and rupture risk of small (less than 7mm) UIAs, identifying associated risk factors and providing an aneurysm surveillance protocol in appropriately selected patients. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to March 2020 for published studies reporting the growth and rupture risks of small UIAs. Twenty-one studies reporting 8428 small UIAs were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled mean age was 61 years (95% CI: 55-67). The mean follow-up period for growth and rupture ranged from 11 to 108 months, with the pooled mean follow-up period across 14 studies being 42 months (95% CI: 33-51). Pooled overall growth rate was 6.0% (95% CI: 3.8-8.7). Pooled growth rates for aneurysms < 5mm and < 3 mm were 5.2% (95% CI: 3.0-7.9) and 0.8% (95% CI: 0.0-6.1), respectively. Pooled overall rupture rate was 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2-0.7). From the meta-regression analysis, having multiple aneurysms, smoking, hypertension, and personal history of SAH did not significantly predict growth, and a personal history of SAH, smoking, hypertension, and multiple aneurysms were not statistically significant predictors of rupture. Our findings suggest that small UIAs have low growth and rupture rates and very small UIAs have little or no risk for rupture. In the setting of incidental small UIAs, patients with multiple and/or posterior circulation aneurysms require more regular radiological monitoring.

Stroke as a Neurological Complication of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence, Outcomes and Predictors.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is a multi-system infection which predominantly affects the respiratory system, but also causes systemic inflammation, endothelialitis and thrombosis. The consequences of this include renal dysfunction, hepatitis and stroke. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of patients who suffer from stroke as a complication of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of all studies published between November 1, 2019 and July 8, 2020 which reported on patients who suffered from stroke as a complication of COVID-19. RESULTS: 326 studies were screened, and 30 studies reporting findings from 55,176 patients including 899 with stroke were included. The average age of patients who suffered from stroke as a complication of COVID-19 was 65.5 (Range: 40.4-76.4 years). The average incidence of stroke as a complication of COVID-19 was 1.74% (95% CI: 1.09% to 2.51%). The average mortality of stroke in COVID-19 patients was 31.76% (95% CI: 17.77% to 47.31%). These patients also had deranged clinical parameters including deranged coagulation profiles, liver function tests, and full blood counts. CONCLUSION: Although stroke is an uncommon complication of COVID-19, when present, it often results in significant morbidity and mortality. In COVID-19 patients, stroke was associated with older age, comorbidities, and severe illness.

Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Efficacy of Treatment in Patients Infected With COVID-19: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread globally in the beginning of 2020. At present, predictors of severe disease and the efficacy of different treatments are not well understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies up to 15 March 2020, which reported COVID-19 clinical features and/or treatment outcomes. Forty-five studies reporting 4203 patients were included. Pooled rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were 10.9%, 4.3%, and 18.4%, respectively. On meta-regression, ICU admission was predicted by increased leukocyte count (P < .0001), alanine aminotransferase (P = .024), and aspartate transaminase (P = .0040); elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P < .0001); and increased procalcitonin (P < .0001). ARDS was predicted by elevated LDH (P < .0001), while mortality was predicted by increased leukocyte count (P = .0005) and elevated LDH (P < .0001). Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir showed no significant benefit in mortality and ARDS rates. Corticosteroids were associated with a higher rate of ARDS (P = .0003).

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnancy: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

OBJECTIVES: We examined data from the International Registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization to identify risk factors for mortality in pregnant and peripartum patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: International Registry of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. PATIENTS: We collected de-identified data on all peripartum patients who needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between 1997 and 2017 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Edition criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Our primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. We also collected data on demographics, preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation ventilator, hemodynamic and biochemical parameters, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mode, duration, and complications. Initial bivariate analysis assessed potential associations between survival and various preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related factors. Variables with p values of less than 0.1 were considered for logistic regression analysis which identified predictors of mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 280 peripartum patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall maternal survival was 70%, with observed mortality for these patients decreasing over the 21-year time period. Multivariate regression identified extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio, 3.674; 95% CI, 1.425-9.473; overall p = 0.025), duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (< 66 hr: odds ratio, 1; 66-128 hr: odds ratio, 0.281; 95% CI, 0.101-0.777; p = 0.014; 128-232 hr: odds ratio, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.191-1.174; p = 0.107; and > 232 hr: odds ratio, 1.084; 95% CI, 0.429-2.737; p = 0.864; overall p = 0.017), and renal complications on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 2.346; 95% CI, 1.203-4.572; p = 0.012) as significant risk factors for mortality. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between venovenous versus venoarterial versus mixed group extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (23.9 vs 34.4 vs 29.4%; p = 0.2) or between pulmonary versus cardiac indications (1.634; 95% CI, 0.797-3.352; p = 0.18) for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: On analysis of this multicenter database, pregnant and peripartum patients with refractory cardiac or respiratory failure supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had survival rates of 70%. We identified preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related factors that are associated with mortality.

Clinical Application of a Stereotactic Frame-Specific 3D-Printed Attachment for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Mispositioning of microelectrodes during deep brain stimulation surgery can incur serious complications for patients. Current practice of creating a burr hole for introduction of the microelectrode is done freehand and can cause trajectory misalignment. We aimed to create a sterilizable surgical adjunct to minimize error from burr hole placement. METHODS: We designed and demonstrated clinical use of a 3D-printed surgical jig that can be mounted to the current Cosman-Roberts-Wells stereotactic frame. The jig allowed accurate placement of the perforating burr for creation of the burr hole. RESULTS: Intraoperative usage of the jig in 11 patients who underwent bilateral deep brain stimulation microelectrode placement for Parkinson disease demonstrated high accuracy of microelectrode placement, with an average 1.18 mm deviation (range, 0-2.7 mm) from intended trajectories. No intraoperative complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study highlights the utility of 3D-printed surgical adjuncts that are fully customizable and rapidly produced to improve current surgical practice. The jig reduced surgery duration, need for multiple trajectories, and risk of potentially devastating neurological complications. As demonstrated, 3D-printed devices are useful as surgical adjuncts to optimize safety and efficacy in deep brain stimulation surgeries.

Seizure outcome after resection of insular glioma: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: Gliomas arising from the insular cortex can be epileptogenic, with a significant proportion of patients having medically refractory epilepsy. The impact of surgery on seizure control for such tumors is not well established. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate seizure outcomes after resection of insular gliomas using a meta-analysis and institutional experience. METHODS: Three databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched for published studies of seizure outcomes after insular glioma resection from database inception to March 27, 2021. In addition, data were retrospectively collected on all adults (age > 17 years) who had undergone insular glioma resection between June 1997 and June 2015 at the authors' institution. Primary outcome measures were seizure freedom rates at 1 year and the last follow-up. Secondary outcome measures consisted of persistent postoperative neurological deficit beyond 90 days, mortality, and tumor progression or recurrence. RESULTS: Eight studies reporting on 453 patients who had undergone 460 operations were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean age of the patients was 42 years. The pooled percentages of patients with extents of resection (EORs) ≥ 90%, 70%-89%, and < 70% were 55%, 33%, and 11%, respectively. The pooled seizure freedom rate at 1 year was 73% for Engel class IA and 78% for Engel class I. The pooled seizure freedom rate at the last follow-up was 60% for Engel class IA and 79% for Engel class I. The pooled percentage of persistent neurological deficit beyond 90 days was 3%. At the authors' institution, 109 patients had undergone resection of insular glioma. A greater EOR was the only significant independent predictor of seizure freedom after surgery (HR 0.290, p = 0.017). The optimal threshold for seizure freedom corresponded to an EOR of 81%. Patients with an EOR > 81% had a significantly higher seizure freedom rate (OR 2.16, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal safe resection can be performed with minimal surgical morbidity to achieve favorable seizure freedom rates in both the short and long term. When gross-total resection is not possible, an EOR > 81% confers the greatest sensitivity and specificity for achieving seizure freedom. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42021249404 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Impact of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes After Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) allows for greater tumor visualization and extent of resection. It is increasingly used in transsphenoidal surgeries but its role is not yet established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the usefulness of iMRI in transsphenoidal surgery using direct statistical comparisons, with additional subgroup and regression analyses to investigate which patients benefit the most from iMRI use. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to May 2020 for published studies reporting the outcomes of iMRI use in transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies reporting 2106 transsphenoidal surgeries in 2099 patients were included. Of these surgeries, 1487 (70.6%) were for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, whereas 619 (29.4%) were for functioning adenomas. Pooled gross total resection (GTR) was 47.6% without iMRI and 66.8% with iMRI (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; P < 0.001). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses demonstrated comparable increases in GTR between microscopic (RR, 1.35; P < 0.001) and endoscopic (RR, 1.31; P < 0.001) approaches as well as functioning and nonfunctioning adenomas (P = 0.584). The pooled rate of hypersecretion normalization was 73.0% within 3 months and 51.7% beyond 3 months postoperatively. The pooled rate of short-term and long-term improvement in visual symptoms was 96.5% and 84.9%, respectively. The incidence of postoperative surgical complications was low. The pooled reoperation rate was 3.8% across 1106 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of iMRI as an adjunct significantly increases GTR for both microscopic and endoscopic resection of pituitary adenomas, with comparable benefits for both functioning and nonfunctioning adenomas. Satisfactory endocrinologic and visual outcomes were achieved.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between cyproterone acetate and intracranial meningiomas.

The influence of exposure to hormonal treatments, particularly cyproterone acetate (CPA), has been posited to contribute to the growth of meningiomas. Given the widespread use of CPA, this systematic review and meta-analysis attempted to assess real-world evidence of the association between CPA and the occurrence of intracranial meningiomas. Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Controlled Trials, were performed from database inception to 18th December 2021. Four retrospective observational studies reporting 8,132,348 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was a total of 165,988 subjects with usage of CPA. The age of patients at meningioma diagnosis was generally above 45 years in all studies. The dosage of CPA taken by the exposed group (n = 165,988) was specified in three of the four included studies. All studies that analyzed high versus low dose CPA found a significant association between high dose CPA usage and increased risk of meningioma. When high and low dose patients were grouped together, there was no statistically significant increase in risk of meningioma associated with use of CPA (RR = 3.78 [95% CI 0.31-46.39], p = 0.190). Usage of CPA is associated with increased risk of meningioma at high doses but not when low doses are also included. Routine screening and meningioma surveillance by brain MRI offered to patients prescribed with CPA is likely a reasonable clinical consideration if given at high doses for long periods of time. Our findings highlight the need for further research on this topic.

Tenets for the Proper Conduct and Use of Meta-Analyses: A Practical Guide for Neurosurgeons.

Neurosurgeons today are inundated with rapidly amassing neurosurgical research publications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consequently surged in popularity because, when executed properly, they constitute a high level of evidence and may save busy neurosurgeons many hours of combing and reviewing the literature for relevant articles. Meta-analysis refers to the quantitative (and discretionary) component of systematic reviews. It involves applying statistical techniques to combine effect sizes from multiple studies, which might offer more actionable insights than a systematic review without meta-analysis. Well-executed meta-analyses may prove instructive for clinical practice, but poorly conducted ones sow confusion and have the potential to cause harm. Unfortunately, recent audits have found the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses in neurosurgery (but also other surgical disciplines) to be relatively lackluster in methodologic rigor and compliance to established guidelines. Some of these deficiencies can be easily remedied through better awareness and adherence to prescribed standards-which will be reviewed in this article-but others stem from inherent problems with the source data (e.g., poor reporting of original research) as well as unique constraints faced by surgery as a field (e.g., lack of equipoise for randomized trials, or existence of learning curves for novel surgical procedures, which can lead to temporal heterogeneity), which may require unconventional tools (e.g., cumulative meta-analysis) to address. Therefore, it is also our goal to take stock of the unique issues encountered by surgeons who do meta-analysis and to highlight various techniques-some of which less well-known-to address such challenges.

Clinical Outcomes of 3D-Printed Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Pilot Study on 126 Patients for Burrhole Covers in Subdural Hematoma.

Burrhole craniostomy is commonly performed for subdural hematoma (SDH) evacuation, but residual scalp depressions are often cosmetically suboptimal for patients. OsteoplugTM, a bioresorbable polycaprolactone burrhole cover, was introduced by the National University Hospital, Singapore, in 2006 to cover these defects, allowing osseous integration and vascular ingrowth. However, the cosmetic and safety outcomes of OsteoplugTM-C-the latest (2017) iteration, with a chamfered hole for subdural drains-remain unexplored. Data were collected from a single institution from April 2017 to March 2021. Patient-reported aesthetic outcomes (Aesthetic Numeric Analog (ANA)) and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L including Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) were assessed via telephone interviews. Clinical outcomes included SDH recurrence, postoperative infections, and drain complications. OsteoplugTM-C patients had significantly higher satisfaction and quality of life compared to those without a burrhole cover (ANA: 9 [7, 9] vs. 7 [5, 8], p = 0.019; VAS: 85 [75, 90] vs. 70 [50, 80], p = 0.021), and the absence of a burrhole cover was associated with poorer aesthetic outcomes after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR: 4.55, 95% CI: 1.09-22.68, p = 0.047). No significant differences in other clinical outcomes were observed between OsteoplugTM-C, OsteoplugTM, or no burrhole cover. Our pilot study supports OsteoplugTM-C and its material polycaprolactone as suitable adjuncts to burrhole craniostomy, improving cosmetic outcomes while achieving comparable safety outcomes.