[The application study of Electrophysiological appropriate technology in perioperative nursing of patients undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction].

Obstract: To explore the application of electrophysiological appropriate technology in perioperative nursing of patients undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 108 patients who underwent testicular incision and sperm extraction under a microscope at our center from May 2022 to June 2023. Among them, 51 patients received routine care and 57 patients received electrophysiological treatment. Evaluate the perioperative nursing effects of appropriate electrophysiological techniques through VAS pain score, Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Score, and Kolcaba Comfort Scale. RESULT: Patients who received appropriate electrophysiological interventions had lower VAS pain scores (2.36 ± 1.37 vs 4.16 ± 1.38, P<0.001) than the control group, and higher KOLCABA comfort scale scores than the control group (70.73 ± 19.46 vs 52.06 ± 17.50, P<0.001); There was no statistically significant difference in the Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Score. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiological techniques can effectively improve postoperative pain and comfort in patients undergoing testicular incision and sperm extraction under a microscope, and have clinical application value.

[Nursing cooperation in surgical collection of testis tissues from prepubertal male patients for cryopreservation: A study of 4 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To explore nursing cooperation in surgical collection of the testis tissue from prepubertal male patients for cryopreservation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the methods and effects of perioperative nursing in surgical collection of the testis tissue from 4 prepubertal male patients for cryopreservation in our Center of Reproductive Medicine. Before, during and after operation, we took strict measures in making sterilized ice containers, intraoperative nursing cooperation, protection of the isolated testis tissues and transferring of the samples. RESULTS: Testis tissues were successfully collected from all the 4 prepubertal males, 31, 31, 20 and 34 samples from each case respectively, well protected and subjected to slow cryopreservation after standard processing in the embryo laboratory. CONCLUSION: In surgical collection of the testis tissue for cryopreservation, preparation of sterilized ice containers, intraoperative nursing cooperation and protection and transferring of the samples are essential for standard processing and cryopreservation of the testis tissue in the embryo laboratory.

[Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia patients with the history of secondary testicular injury].

Objective: To investigate the value of micro- dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in patients with the history of secondary testicular injury. METHODS: Totally, 121 NOA patients with the history of secondary testicular injury underwent micro-TESE in our hospital from September 2014 to December 2017. We analyzed the correlation of the sperm retrieval rate with the causes of testicular injury and compared the outcomes of the ICSI cycles with the sperm retrieved from the NOA males by micro-TESE (the micro-TESE group) and those with the sperm ejaculated from severe oligospermia patients (sperm concentration <1×106/ml, the ejaculate group). Comparisons were also made between the two groups in the female age, two-pronucleus (2PN) fertilization rate, transferrable embryos on day 3 (D3), D3 high- quality embryos, D14 blood HCG positive rate, embryo implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Testicular sperm were successfully retrieved by micro-TESE in 86.0% of the patients (104/121), of whom 98.4% had the history of orchitis, 75.5% had been treated surgically for cryptorchidism, and 63.6% had received chemo- or radiotherapy. No statistically significant differences were observed between the micro-TESE and ejaculate groups in the 2PN fertilization rate (59.4% vs 69.3%, P > 0.05), D14 blood HCG positive rate (44.6% vs 57.9%, P > 0.05), embryo implantation rate (31.8 %% vs 32.6%, P > 0.05) and clinical pregnancy rate (41.5% vs 48.7%, P > 0.05). However, the rate D3 transferrable embryos was significantly lower in the micro-TESE than in the ejaculate group (40.5% vs 52.2%,P < 0.05), and so was that of D3 high-quality embryos (32.5% vs 42.1%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Micro-TESE can be applied as the first choice for NOA patients with the history of secondary testicular injury, but more effective strategies are to be explored for the improvement of ICSI outcomes with the sperm retrieved by micro- TESE.