Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 24(5): 461-467, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32431167

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In this article, we present the Canadian Dermatology Association's (CDA) Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) list of top "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question in Dermatology" and the evidence in support of each recommendation. METHODS: Using a nominal technique, the CDA Working Group and Task Force generated an initial list based on literature review and expert consultation. After several rounds of list refinement via a modified Delphi process, a final list of recommendations was generated. These were approved by the CDA Board of Directors, presented at the CDA 93rd Annual Conference in 2018, and published by CWC in 2019. RESULTS: The top five recommendations are as follows: (1) Don't routinely prescribe antibiotics for bilateral lower leg redness and swelling; (2) Don't routinely prescribe topical combination corticosteroid/antifungal products; (3) Don't routinely use topical antibiotics on a surgical wound; (4) Don't prescribe systemic antifungals without mycological confirmation of dermatophyte infection; and (5) Don't use oral antibiotics for acne vulgaris for more than 3 months without assessing efficacy. DISCUSSION: This list of recommendations aims to encourage both physicians and patients to reevaluate ineffective, yet common, practices in treating dermatologic conditions. These recommendations represent actionable changes in practice, and therefore have considerable potential to enhance value-based care in dermatology. CONCLUSIONS: This list was developed to identify tangible changes in practice within dermatology that may reduce inefficiencies, prevent potential patient harm, and improve care. Future advocacy work may include updates, feedback obtainment, and patient care handouts, to continue to promote value-based healthcare and best practices.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Comitês Consultivos , Canadá , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
3.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 22(3): 273-279, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29357685

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: The instruction of dermatology can be challenging due to its large scope, heavy clinical nature, and limited curriculum space. Case-based learning (CBL) is an emerging education paradigm and has no current literature on its use in dermatology. OBJECTIVES: Assess CBL in undergraduate dermatology medical education. METHODS: Case-based learning was implemented in the preclerkship dermatology curriculum at the University of Toronto to 3 student cohorts (totaling 710 students and 93 tutors) between May 2016 and April 2017. We analyzed assignment performance, pre- and post-CBL knowledge test scores, and experience surveys on students and tutors. Surveys were evaluated using aggregate descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic data analysis for qualitative data. All assessments were anonymous and voluntary. RESULTS: We received strong positive feedback on the CBL experience, with no score less than 3.8 on a 5-point scale (where 5 indicated strongly agree with a positively phrased question). Thematic data analysis revealed several key themes, including positive comments for a specialist tutor, the use of visual media, and the "mini-cases" style of CBL, while challenges included a lack of motivation. Group assignments scored high, ranging from 88.9% to 99.3%. Tracked pre- and post-CBL knowledge test scores showed a 32% (from 42% to 74%) increase in scores after the CBL experience. Conclusion and Relevance: CBL in dermatology medical education was well received by students and tutors, with high scores in content evaluation and knowledge assessment. Future studies should examine optimal delivery methods and its long-term effects on knowledge retention.


Assuntos
Dermatologia/educação , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Avaliação Educacional , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Docentes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 22(6): 591-601, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29707979

RESUMO

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare but serious and difficult to treat cutaneous disease, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the numerous treatment regimens available, the overall quality of evidence-based research is limited with a lack of an algorithmic approach available. In this review, we aim to evaluate the current level of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety/tolerability of systemic monotherapies available in the treatment of GPP. A comprehensive MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed search of clinical studies examining systemic monotherapy treatment options for GPP was conducted. In total, 31 studies met eligibility criteria. Described treatment modalities included retinoids, cyclosporine, biologics, and dapsone. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence or a well-accepted treatment algorithm for GPP, systemic retinoids, cyclosporine, biologics, and dapsone are all possible first-line agents, with retinoids being one of the best-supported treatment options and biologics as an emerging therapeutic field with great potential requiring additional data. However, the final choice of treatment should be considered within the unique context of each patient.


Assuntos
Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
9.
Clin Teach ; 16(3): 220-225, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29893013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As health care costs rise, medical education must focus on high-value clinical decision making. To teach and assess efficient resource use in rheumatology, online virtual interactive cases (VICs) were developed to simulate real patient encounters to increase price transparency and reinforce cost consciousness. To teach and assess efficient resource use in rheumatology, online virtual interactive cases (VICs) were developed METHODS: The VIC modules were distributed to a sample of medical students and internal medicine residents, who were required to assess patients, order appropriate investigations, develop differential diagnoses and formulate management plans. Each action was associated with a time and price, with the totals compared against ideals. Trainees were evaluated not only on their diagnosis and patient management, but also on the total time, cost and value of their selected workup. Trainee responses were tracked anonymously, with opportunity to provide feedback at the end of each case. RESULTS: Seventeen medical trainees completed a total of 48 VIC modules. On average, trainees spent CAN $227.52 and 68 virtual minutes on each case, which was lower than expected. This may have been the result of a low management score of 52.4%, although on average 92.0% of participants in each case achieved the correct diagnosis. In addition, 85.7% felt more comfortable working up similar cases, and 57.1% believed that the modules increased their ability to appropriately order cost-conscious rheumatology investigations. DISCUSSION: Our initial assessment of the VIC rheumatology modules was positive, supporting their role as an effective tool in teaching an approach to rheumatology patients, with an emphasis on resource stewardship. Future directions include the expansion of cases, based on feedback, wider dissemination and an evaluation of learning retention.


Assuntos
Instrução por Computador/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Reumatologia/educação , Realidade Virtual , Instrução por Computador/economia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/economia , Humanos , Internato e Residência/economia , Simulação de Paciente , Fatores de Tempo
11.
J Neurosurg ; : 1-8, 2018 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882700

RESUMO

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to derive a clinically applicable decision rule using clinical, radiological, and laboratory data to predict the development of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients.METHODSPatients presenting over a consecutive 9-year period with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and at least 1 angiographically evident aneurysm were included. Variables significantly associated with DCI in univariate analysis underwent multivariable logistic regression. Using the beta coefficients, points were assigned to each predictor to establish a scoring system with estimated risks. DCI was defined as neurological deterioration attributable to arterial narrowing detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography, MR angiography, or catheter angiography, after exclusion of competing diagnoses.RESULTSOf 463 patients, 58% experienced angiographic vasospasm with an overall DCI incidence of 21%. Age, modified Fisher grade, and ruptured aneurysm location were significantly associated with DCI. This combination of predictors had a greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than the modified Fisher grade alone (0.73 [95% CI 0.67-0.78] vs 0.66 [95% CI 0.60-0.71]). Patients 70 years or older with modified Fisher grade 0 or 1 SAH and a posterior circulation aneurysm had the lowest risk of DCI at 1.2% (0 points). The highest estimated risk was 38% (17 points) in patients 40-59 years old with modified Fisher grade 4 SAH following rupture of an anterior circulation aneurysm.CONCLUSIONSAmong patients presenting with aSAH, this score-based clinical prediction tool exhibits increased accuracy over the modified Fisher grade alone and may serve as a useful tool to individualize DCI risk.

12.
Int J Dermatol ; 56(9): 902-908, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28239840

RESUMO

Currently available treatment options for melasma include prevention of UV radiation, topical lightening agents, chemical peels, and light-based and laser therapies. However, none have shown effective and sustained results, with incomplete clearance and frequent recurrences. There has been increasing interest recently in oral medications and dietary supplements in improving melasma. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of oral medications and dietary supplements for the treatment of melasma. Multiple databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of oral medication for treatment of melasma alone or in combination with other treatments. A total of eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Oral medications and dietary supplements evaluated include tranexamic acid, Polypodium leucotomos extract, beta-carotenoid, melatonin, and procyanidin. These agents appear to have a beneficial effect on melasma improvement. In conclusion, oral medications have a role in melasma treatment and have been shown to be efficacious and tolerable with a minimal number and severity of adverse events. Therefore, dermatologists should keep oral medications and dietary supplements in their armamentarium for the treatment of melasma.


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Melanose/tratamento farmacológico , Fitoterapia , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Antifibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Biflavonoides/uso terapêutico , Carotenoides/uso terapêutico , Catequina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Melatonina/uso terapêutico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Polypodium , Proantocianidinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ácido Tranexâmico/administração & dosagem
13.
Transl Pediatr ; 6(1): 18-26, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28164026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Completing large systematic reviews and maintaining them up to date poses significant challenges. This is mainly due to the toll required of a small group of experts to screen and extract potentially eligible citations. Automated approaches have failed so far in providing an accessible and adaptable tool to the research community. Over the past decade, crowdsourcing has become attractive in the scientific field, and implementing it in citation screening could save the investigative team significant work and decrease the time to publication. METHODS: Citations from the 2015 update of a pediatrics vitamin D systematic review were uploaded to an online platform designed for crowdsourcing the screening process (http://www.CHEORI.org/en/CrowdScreenOverview). Three sets of exclusion criteria were used for screening, with a review of abstracts at level one, and full-text eligibility determined through two screening stages. Two trained reviewers, who participated in the initial systematic review, established citation eligibility. In parallel, each citation received four independent assessments from an untrained crowd with a medical background. Citations were retained or excluded if they received three congruent assessments. Otherwise, they were reviewed by the principal investigator. Measured outcomes included sensitivity of the crowd to retain eligible studies, and potential work saved defined as citations sorted by the crowd (excluded or retained) without involvement of the principal investigator. RESULTS: A total of 148 citations for screening were identified, of which 20 met eligibility criteria (true positives). The four reviewers from the crowd agreed completely on 63% (95% CI: 57-69%) of assessments, and achieved a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 88-100%) and a specificity of 99% (95% CI: 96-100%). Potential work saved to the research team was 84% (95% CI: 77-89%) at the abstract screening stage, and 73% (95% CI: 67-79%) through all three levels. In addition, different thresholds for citation retention and exclusion were assessed. With an algorithm favoring sensitivity (citation excluded only if all four reviewers agree), sensitivity was maintained at 100%, with a decrease of potential work saved to 66% (95% CI: 59-71%). In contrast, increasing the threshold required for retention (exclude all citations not obtaining 3/4 retain assessments) decreased sensitivity to 85% (95% CI: 65-96%), while improving potential workload saved to 92% (95% CI: 88-95%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the accuracy of crowdsourcing for systematic review citations screening, with retention of all eligible articles and a significant reduction in the work required from the investigative team. Together, these two findings suggest that crowdsourcing could represent a significant advancement in the area of systematic review. Future directions include further study to assess validity across medical fields and determination of the capacity of a non-medical crowd.

14.
PeerJ ; 4: e1701, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26966655

RESUMO

Background. Due to inadequate UV exposure, intake of small quantities of vitamin D is recommended to prevent musculoskeletal disease. Both basic science and observational literature strongly suggest that higher doses may benefit specific populations and have non-musculoskeletal roles. Evaluating the evidence surrounding high dose supplementation can be challenging given a relatively large and growing body of clinical trial evidence spanning time, geography, populations and dosing regimens. Study objectives were to identify and summarize the clinical trial literature, recognize areas with high quality evidence, and develop a resource database that makes the literature more immediately accessible to end users. Methods. Medline (1946 to January 2015), Embase (1974 to January 2015), and Cochrane databases (January 2015), were searched for trials. All pediatric (0-18 years) trials administering doses higher than 400 IU (<1 year) or 600 IU (≥1 year) were included. Data was extracted independently by two of the authors. An online searchable database of trials was developed containing relevant extracted information (http://www.cheori.org/en/pedvitaminddatabaseOverview). Sensitivity and utility were assessed by comparing the trials in the database with those from systematic reviews of vitamin D supplementation including children. Results. A total of 2,579 candidate papers were identified, yielding 169 trials having one or more arms meeting eligibility criteria. The publication rate has increased significantly from 1 per year (1970-1979) to 14 per year (2010-2015). Although 84% of the total trials focused on healthy children or known high risk populations (e.g., renal, prematurity), this proportion has declined in recent years due to the rise in trials evaluating populations and outcomes not directly related to the musculoskeletal actions of vitamin D (27% in 2010s). Beyond healthy children, the only pediatric populations with more than 50 participants from low risk of bias trials evaluating a clinically relevant outcome were prematurity and respiratory illness. Finally, we created and validated the online searchable database using 13 recent systematic reviews. Of the 38 high dose trials identified by the systematic review, 36 (94.7%) could be found within the database. When compared with the search strategy reported in each systematic review, use of the database reduced the number of full papers to assess for eligibility by 85.2% (±13.4%). Conclusion. The pediatric vitamin D field is highly active, with a significant increase in trials evaluating non-classical diseases and outcomes. Despite the large overall number there are few high quality trials of sufficient size to provide answers on clinical efficacy of high-dose vitamin D. An open access online searchable data should assist end users in the rapid and comprehensive identification and evaluation of trials relevant to their population or question of interest.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA